Corporate social responsibility and accountability: a new theoretical foundation for regulating CSR
Abstract The absence of consensus on what should constitute Corporate Social Responsibility has inhibited consistent CSR legislation around the world. This paper poses a fundamental question on what should constitute CSR and what should be the nature of CSR regulation? By constructing the boundaries...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SpringerOpen
2020-04-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40991-019-0045-8 |
id |
doaj-4005039a22c64f70a93dbbb3c466ec37 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-4005039a22c64f70a93dbbb3c466ec372020-11-25T02:28:22ZengSpringerOpenInternational Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility2366-00662366-00742020-04-015111410.1186/s40991-019-0045-8Corporate social responsibility and accountability: a new theoretical foundation for regulating CSRMallika Tamvada0School of Law, University of EssexAbstract The absence of consensus on what should constitute Corporate Social Responsibility has inhibited consistent CSR legislation around the world. This paper poses a fundamental question on what should constitute CSR and what should be the nature of CSR regulation? By constructing the boundaries of CSR, the paper offers scope for consistently developing CSR regulation around the world. It construes CSR as consisting of business relation and impact relation, and demonstrates that these are intertwined with legal responsibilities of business and, consequentially, with accountability. It accomplishes this by establishing the obligatory nature of responsibilities using the lens of ethical and legal jurisprudence. This new approach towards CSR recasts it as an obligatory responsibility that is linked to accountability. Furthermore, the framework provides a foundation for consistent development of CSR regulation across different countries that can lead to effective discharge of corporates’ social responsibilities.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40991-019-0045-8ResponsibilityAccountabilityCSRCorporate accountabilityBusiness relationImpact relation |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Mallika Tamvada |
spellingShingle |
Mallika Tamvada Corporate social responsibility and accountability: a new theoretical foundation for regulating CSR International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility Responsibility Accountability CSR Corporate accountability Business relation Impact relation |
author_facet |
Mallika Tamvada |
author_sort |
Mallika Tamvada |
title |
Corporate social responsibility and accountability: a new theoretical foundation for regulating CSR |
title_short |
Corporate social responsibility and accountability: a new theoretical foundation for regulating CSR |
title_full |
Corporate social responsibility and accountability: a new theoretical foundation for regulating CSR |
title_fullStr |
Corporate social responsibility and accountability: a new theoretical foundation for regulating CSR |
title_full_unstemmed |
Corporate social responsibility and accountability: a new theoretical foundation for regulating CSR |
title_sort |
corporate social responsibility and accountability: a new theoretical foundation for regulating csr |
publisher |
SpringerOpen |
series |
International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility |
issn |
2366-0066 2366-0074 |
publishDate |
2020-04-01 |
description |
Abstract The absence of consensus on what should constitute Corporate Social Responsibility has inhibited consistent CSR legislation around the world. This paper poses a fundamental question on what should constitute CSR and what should be the nature of CSR regulation? By constructing the boundaries of CSR, the paper offers scope for consistently developing CSR regulation around the world. It construes CSR as consisting of business relation and impact relation, and demonstrates that these are intertwined with legal responsibilities of business and, consequentially, with accountability. It accomplishes this by establishing the obligatory nature of responsibilities using the lens of ethical and legal jurisprudence. This new approach towards CSR recasts it as an obligatory responsibility that is linked to accountability. Furthermore, the framework provides a foundation for consistent development of CSR regulation across different countries that can lead to effective discharge of corporates’ social responsibilities. |
topic |
Responsibility Accountability CSR Corporate accountability Business relation Impact relation |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40991-019-0045-8 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mallikatamvada corporatesocialresponsibilityandaccountabilityanewtheoreticalfoundationforregulatingcsr |
_version_ |
1724838582527459328 |