Evidence–Based Practice for Psychologists in Education: A Comparative Study from the Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Slovenia
Background. In recent decades, discussion has been increasing about the guidelines for psychological interventions, evidence-based interventions (EBI), and evidence–based practice (EBP). Tese eforts have a longer tradition in medicine and psychiatry, but are increasingly present in the practice of...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University
2019-12-01
|
Series: | Psychology in Russia: State of Art |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://psychologyinrussia.com/volumes/pdf/2019_4/Psychology_4_2019_79-100_Juri%C5%A1evi%C4%8D.pdf |
id |
doaj-3ff28ddce80647fbb70d4f4db2d43638 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-3ff28ddce80647fbb70d4f4db2d436382020-11-25T02:02:48ZengM.V. Lomonosov Moscow State UniversityPsychology in Russia: State of Art2074-68572307-22022019-12-011247910010.11621/pir.2019.0405Evidence–Based Practice for Psychologists in Education: A Comparative Study from the Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Slovenia Mojca Juriševič0Bohumíra Lazarová1Eva Gajdošová2University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education, Ljubljana, SloveniaMasaryk University, Faculty of Arts, Brno, Czech RepublicPan–European University, Faculty of Psychology, Bratislava, SlovakiaBackground. In recent decades, discussion has been increasing about the guidelines for psychological interventions, evidence-based interventions (EBI), and evidence–based practice (EBP). Tese eforts have a longer tradition in medicine and psychiatry, but are increasingly present in the practice of school psychology. Te creation, use, and implementation of EBP procedures protects psychologists from intuitive and non–scientifc procedures that can harm clients, psychology, and its development. Objective. Te focus of this article is the EBP of school psychologists in the Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Slovenia. We researched to what degree psychologists implement EBP in their work in educational institutions, in which domains they most efectively apply EBP, and what the obstacles and needs are regarding EBP in school psychology. Design. Two hundred and two school psychologists answered a questionnaire about their application of EBP. Te questionnaire contains categories about the sources of EBP, its availability, and the extent to which respondents apply EBP in specifc domains of their work. Results. Te data show a low practical signifcance of diferences among respondents from the three countries. Respondents reported the highest values for the reliance of their work on professional cooperation, use of EBP principles in specifc domains, and use of professional guidelines. Te Pearson correlation indicates positive association among all substantial categories. Conclusion. Te preliminary results show that school psychologists are aware of the importance of applying EBP in practice, and highlight some of the obstacles that prevent them from cultivating psychological science in the interest of education.http://psychologyinrussia.com/volumes/pdf/2019_4/Psychology_4_2019_79-100_Juri%C5%A1evi%C4%8D.pdfschool psychologyapplied psychologyevidence-based practicequality assurancepsychological science |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Mojca Juriševič Bohumíra Lazarová Eva Gajdošová |
spellingShingle |
Mojca Juriševič Bohumíra Lazarová Eva Gajdošová Evidence–Based Practice for Psychologists in Education: A Comparative Study from the Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Slovenia Psychology in Russia: State of Art school psychology applied psychology evidence-based practice quality assurance psychological science |
author_facet |
Mojca Juriševič Bohumíra Lazarová Eva Gajdošová |
author_sort |
Mojca Juriševič |
title |
Evidence–Based Practice for Psychologists in Education: A Comparative Study from the Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Slovenia |
title_short |
Evidence–Based Practice for Psychologists in Education: A Comparative Study from the Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Slovenia |
title_full |
Evidence–Based Practice for Psychologists in Education: A Comparative Study from the Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Slovenia |
title_fullStr |
Evidence–Based Practice for Psychologists in Education: A Comparative Study from the Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Slovenia |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evidence–Based Practice for Psychologists in Education: A Comparative Study from the Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Slovenia |
title_sort |
evidence–based practice for psychologists in education: a comparative study from the czech republic, slovakia, and slovenia |
publisher |
M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University |
series |
Psychology in Russia: State of Art |
issn |
2074-6857 2307-2202 |
publishDate |
2019-12-01 |
description |
Background. In recent decades, discussion has been increasing about the guidelines for psychological interventions, evidence-based interventions
(EBI), and evidence–based practice (EBP). Tese eforts have a longer tradition in medicine and psychiatry, but are increasingly present in the practice of school psychology. Te creation, use, and implementation of EBP procedures protects psychologists from intuitive and non–scientifc procedures that can harm clients, psychology, and its development.
Objective. Te focus of this article is the EBP of school psychologists in the Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Slovenia. We researched to what degree
psychologists implement EBP in their work in educational institutions, in which domains they most efectively apply EBP, and what the obstacles and needs are regarding EBP in school psychology.
Design. Two hundred and two school psychologists answered a questionnaire about their application of EBP. Te questionnaire contains categories about the sources of EBP, its availability, and the extent to which
respondents apply EBP in specifc domains of their work.
Results. Te data show a low practical signifcance of diferences among respondents from the three countries. Respondents reported the highest values for the reliance of their work on professional cooperation, use
of EBP principles in specifc domains, and use of professional guidelines. Te Pearson correlation indicates positive association among all substantial
categories.
Conclusion. Te preliminary results show that school psychologists are aware of the importance of applying EBP in practice, and highlight some of
the obstacles that prevent them from cultivating psychological science in the interest of education. |
topic |
school psychology applied psychology evidence-based practice quality assurance psychological science |
url |
http://psychologyinrussia.com/volumes/pdf/2019_4/Psychology_4_2019_79-100_Juri%C5%A1evi%C4%8D.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mojcajurisevic evidencebasedpracticeforpsychologistsineducationacomparativestudyfromtheczechrepublicslovakiaandslovenia AT bohumiralazarova evidencebasedpracticeforpsychologistsineducationacomparativestudyfromtheczechrepublicslovakiaandslovenia AT evagajdosova evidencebasedpracticeforpsychologistsineducationacomparativestudyfromtheczechrepublicslovakiaandslovenia |
_version_ |
1724951549102260224 |