Plato's Sophist 259E4-6
There are at least seven different well-known interpretations of Sophist 259E4-6. In this paper Ishow them to be either misleading, in conflict with the context, or at odds with Plato’s project inthe dialogue. I argue that 259E4-6 tells us that in view of the fact that statements consist in theweavi...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
2012-12-01
|
Series: | Revista de Filosofia Antiga |
Online Access: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/filosofiaantiga/article/view/46734 |
id |
doaj-3fdc6ef3dbea4f879d79744d2a1756d6 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-3fdc6ef3dbea4f879d79744d2a1756d62021-06-24T15:37:47ZdeuUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)Revista de Filosofia Antiga1981-94712012-12-016210.11606/issn.1981-9471.v6i2p1-35Plato's Sophist 259E4-6Simon Noriega-Olmos0Universidade de São PauloThere are at least seven different well-known interpretations of Sophist 259E4-6. In this paper Ishow them to be either misleading, in conflict with the context, or at odds with Plato’s project inthe dialogue. I argue that 259E4-6 tells us that in view of the fact that statements consist in theweaving of different linguistic terms that stand for different extra-linguistic items, if there is to bestatements, then reality must consist in a plurality of items some of which mix with some andsome of which do not mix with some according to certain ontological rules. My argument for thisconstrual of Sophist 259E4-6 involves an analysis of the passage as well as an assessment of howthat text fits into its context.https://www.revistas.usp.br/filosofiaantiga/article/view/46734 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
deu |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Simon Noriega-Olmos |
spellingShingle |
Simon Noriega-Olmos Plato's Sophist 259E4-6 Revista de Filosofia Antiga |
author_facet |
Simon Noriega-Olmos |
author_sort |
Simon Noriega-Olmos |
title |
Plato's Sophist 259E4-6 |
title_short |
Plato's Sophist 259E4-6 |
title_full |
Plato's Sophist 259E4-6 |
title_fullStr |
Plato's Sophist 259E4-6 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Plato's Sophist 259E4-6 |
title_sort |
plato's sophist 259e4-6 |
publisher |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
series |
Revista de Filosofia Antiga |
issn |
1981-9471 |
publishDate |
2012-12-01 |
description |
There are at least seven different well-known interpretations of Sophist 259E4-6. In this paper Ishow them to be either misleading, in conflict with the context, or at odds with Plato’s project inthe dialogue. I argue that 259E4-6 tells us that in view of the fact that statements consist in theweaving of different linguistic terms that stand for different extra-linguistic items, if there is to bestatements, then reality must consist in a plurality of items some of which mix with some andsome of which do not mix with some according to certain ontological rules. My argument for thisconstrual of Sophist 259E4-6 involves an analysis of the passage as well as an assessment of howthat text fits into its context. |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/filosofiaantiga/article/view/46734 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT simonnoriegaolmos platossophist259e46 |
_version_ |
1721361173947875328 |