Assessing the Feasibility of Managed Aquifer Recharge for Irrigation under Uncertainty

Additional storage of water is a potential option to meet future water supply goals. Financial comparisons are needed to improve decision making about whether to store water in surface reservoirs or below ground, using managed aquifer recharge (MAR). In some places, the results of cost-benefit analy...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Muhammad Arshad, Joseph H.A. Guillaume, Andrew Ross
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2014-09-01
Series:Water
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/6/9/2748
id doaj-3fcd587626c445b3b99dd6955233b875
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3fcd587626c445b3b99dd6955233b8752020-11-24T23:17:52ZengMDPI AGWater2073-44412014-09-01692748276910.3390/w6092748w6092748Assessing the Feasibility of Managed Aquifer Recharge for Irrigation under UncertaintyMuhammad Arshad0Joseph H.A. Guillaume1Andrew Ross2National Centre for Groundwater Research and Training and The Fenner School of Environment and Society, Integrated Catchment Assessment and Management Centre (iCAM), building 48a, Linnaeus Way, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, AustraliaNational Centre for Groundwater Research and Training and The Fenner School of Environment and Society, Integrated Catchment Assessment and Management Centre (iCAM), building 48a, Linnaeus Way, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, AustraliaNational Centre for Groundwater Research and Training and The Fenner School of Environment and Society, Integrated Catchment Assessment and Management Centre (iCAM), building 48a, Linnaeus Way, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, AustraliaAdditional storage of water is a potential option to meet future water supply goals. Financial comparisons are needed to improve decision making about whether to store water in surface reservoirs or below ground, using managed aquifer recharge (MAR). In some places, the results of cost-benefit analysis show that MAR is financially superior to surface storage. However, uncertainty often exists as to whether MAR systems will remain operationally effective and profitable in the future, because the profitability of MAR is dependent on many uncertain technical and financial variables. This paper introduces a method to assess the financial feasibility of MAR under uncertainty. We assess such uncertainties by identification of cross-over points in break-even analysis. Cross-over points are the thresholds where MAR and surface storage have equal financial returns. Such thresholds can be interpreted as a set of minimum requirements beyond which an investment in MAR may no longer be worthwhile. Checking that these thresholds are satisfied can improve confidence in decision making. Our suggested approach can also be used to identify areas that may not be suitable for MAR, thereby avoiding expensive hydrogeological and geophysical investigations. http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/6/9/2748managed aquifer rechargefeasibilitycost-benefit analysisbreak-even analysisuncertainty
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Muhammad Arshad
Joseph H.A. Guillaume
Andrew Ross
spellingShingle Muhammad Arshad
Joseph H.A. Guillaume
Andrew Ross
Assessing the Feasibility of Managed Aquifer Recharge for Irrigation under Uncertainty
Water
managed aquifer recharge
feasibility
cost-benefit analysis
break-even analysis
uncertainty
author_facet Muhammad Arshad
Joseph H.A. Guillaume
Andrew Ross
author_sort Muhammad Arshad
title Assessing the Feasibility of Managed Aquifer Recharge for Irrigation under Uncertainty
title_short Assessing the Feasibility of Managed Aquifer Recharge for Irrigation under Uncertainty
title_full Assessing the Feasibility of Managed Aquifer Recharge for Irrigation under Uncertainty
title_fullStr Assessing the Feasibility of Managed Aquifer Recharge for Irrigation under Uncertainty
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the Feasibility of Managed Aquifer Recharge for Irrigation under Uncertainty
title_sort assessing the feasibility of managed aquifer recharge for irrigation under uncertainty
publisher MDPI AG
series Water
issn 2073-4441
publishDate 2014-09-01
description Additional storage of water is a potential option to meet future water supply goals. Financial comparisons are needed to improve decision making about whether to store water in surface reservoirs or below ground, using managed aquifer recharge (MAR). In some places, the results of cost-benefit analysis show that MAR is financially superior to surface storage. However, uncertainty often exists as to whether MAR systems will remain operationally effective and profitable in the future, because the profitability of MAR is dependent on many uncertain technical and financial variables. This paper introduces a method to assess the financial feasibility of MAR under uncertainty. We assess such uncertainties by identification of cross-over points in break-even analysis. Cross-over points are the thresholds where MAR and surface storage have equal financial returns. Such thresholds can be interpreted as a set of minimum requirements beyond which an investment in MAR may no longer be worthwhile. Checking that these thresholds are satisfied can improve confidence in decision making. Our suggested approach can also be used to identify areas that may not be suitable for MAR, thereby avoiding expensive hydrogeological and geophysical investigations.
topic managed aquifer recharge
feasibility
cost-benefit analysis
break-even analysis
uncertainty
url http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/6/9/2748
work_keys_str_mv AT muhammadarshad assessingthefeasibilityofmanagedaquiferrechargeforirrigationunderuncertainty
AT josephhaguillaume assessingthefeasibilityofmanagedaquiferrechargeforirrigationunderuncertainty
AT andrewross assessingthefeasibilityofmanagedaquiferrechargeforirrigationunderuncertainty
_version_ 1725582883179986944