Use of a Machine Learning Method in Predicting Refraction after Cataract Surgery
The present study aims to describe the use of machine learning (ML) in predicting the occurrence of postoperative refraction after cataract surgery and compares the accuracy of this method to conventional intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas. In total, 3331 eyes from 2010 patients were...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-03-01
|
Series: | Journal of Clinical Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/5/1103 |
id |
doaj-3fcbc78cf0894797a82b560091e8b854 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-3fcbc78cf0894797a82b560091e8b8542021-03-07T00:02:03ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832021-03-01101103110310.3390/jcm10051103Use of a Machine Learning Method in Predicting Refraction after Cataract SurgeryTomofusa Yamauchi0Hitoshi Tabuchi1Kosuke Takase2Hiroki Masumoto3Department of Ophthalmology, Tsukazaki Hospital, Himeji 671-1227, JapanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tsukazaki Hospital, Himeji 671-1227, JapanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tsukazaki Hospital, Himeji 671-1227, JapanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tsukazaki Hospital, Himeji 671-1227, JapanThe present study aims to describe the use of machine learning (ML) in predicting the occurrence of postoperative refraction after cataract surgery and compares the accuracy of this method to conventional intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas. In total, 3331 eyes from 2010 patients were assessed. The objects were divided into training data and test data. The constants for the IOL power calculation formulas and model training for ML were optimized using training data. Then, the occurrence of postoperative refraction was predicted using conventional formulas, or ML models were calculated using the test data. We evaluated the SRK/T formula, Haigis formula, Holladay 1 formula, Hoffer Q formula, and Barrett Universal II formula (BU-II); similar to ML methods, we assessed support vector regression (SVR), random forest regression (RFR), gradient boosting regression (GBR), and neural network (NN). Among the conventional formulas, BU-II had the lowest mean and median absolute error of prediction. Therefore, we compared the accuracy of our method with that of BU-II. The absolute errors of some ML methods were lower than those of BU-II. However, no statistically significant difference was observed. Thus, the accuracy of our method was not inferior to that of BU-II.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/5/1103IOL power calculationmachine learninggradient booting regression (GBR)neural networksupport vector regression (SVR)random forest regression (RFR) |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Tomofusa Yamauchi Hitoshi Tabuchi Kosuke Takase Hiroki Masumoto |
spellingShingle |
Tomofusa Yamauchi Hitoshi Tabuchi Kosuke Takase Hiroki Masumoto Use of a Machine Learning Method in Predicting Refraction after Cataract Surgery Journal of Clinical Medicine IOL power calculation machine learning gradient booting regression (GBR) neural network support vector regression (SVR) random forest regression (RFR) |
author_facet |
Tomofusa Yamauchi Hitoshi Tabuchi Kosuke Takase Hiroki Masumoto |
author_sort |
Tomofusa Yamauchi |
title |
Use of a Machine Learning Method in Predicting Refraction after Cataract Surgery |
title_short |
Use of a Machine Learning Method in Predicting Refraction after Cataract Surgery |
title_full |
Use of a Machine Learning Method in Predicting Refraction after Cataract Surgery |
title_fullStr |
Use of a Machine Learning Method in Predicting Refraction after Cataract Surgery |
title_full_unstemmed |
Use of a Machine Learning Method in Predicting Refraction after Cataract Surgery |
title_sort |
use of a machine learning method in predicting refraction after cataract surgery |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Journal of Clinical Medicine |
issn |
2077-0383 |
publishDate |
2021-03-01 |
description |
The present study aims to describe the use of machine learning (ML) in predicting the occurrence of postoperative refraction after cataract surgery and compares the accuracy of this method to conventional intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas. In total, 3331 eyes from 2010 patients were assessed. The objects were divided into training data and test data. The constants for the IOL power calculation formulas and model training for ML were optimized using training data. Then, the occurrence of postoperative refraction was predicted using conventional formulas, or ML models were calculated using the test data. We evaluated the SRK/T formula, Haigis formula, Holladay 1 formula, Hoffer Q formula, and Barrett Universal II formula (BU-II); similar to ML methods, we assessed support vector regression (SVR), random forest regression (RFR), gradient boosting regression (GBR), and neural network (NN). Among the conventional formulas, BU-II had the lowest mean and median absolute error of prediction. Therefore, we compared the accuracy of our method with that of BU-II. The absolute errors of some ML methods were lower than those of BU-II. However, no statistically significant difference was observed. Thus, the accuracy of our method was not inferior to that of BU-II. |
topic |
IOL power calculation machine learning gradient booting regression (GBR) neural network support vector regression (SVR) random forest regression (RFR) |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/5/1103 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT tomofusayamauchi useofamachinelearningmethodinpredictingrefractionaftercataractsurgery AT hitoshitabuchi useofamachinelearningmethodinpredictingrefractionaftercataractsurgery AT kosuketakase useofamachinelearningmethodinpredictingrefractionaftercataractsurgery AT hirokimasumoto useofamachinelearningmethodinpredictingrefractionaftercataractsurgery |
_version_ |
1724229608952299520 |