Use of a Machine Learning Method in Predicting Refraction after Cataract Surgery

The present study aims to describe the use of machine learning (ML) in predicting the occurrence of postoperative refraction after cataract surgery and compares the accuracy of this method to conventional intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas. In total, 3331 eyes from 2010 patients were...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tomofusa Yamauchi, Hitoshi Tabuchi, Kosuke Takase, Hiroki Masumoto
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-03-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/5/1103
id doaj-3fcbc78cf0894797a82b560091e8b854
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3fcbc78cf0894797a82b560091e8b8542021-03-07T00:02:03ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832021-03-01101103110310.3390/jcm10051103Use of a Machine Learning Method in Predicting Refraction after Cataract SurgeryTomofusa Yamauchi0Hitoshi Tabuchi1Kosuke Takase2Hiroki Masumoto3Department of Ophthalmology, Tsukazaki Hospital, Himeji 671-1227, JapanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tsukazaki Hospital, Himeji 671-1227, JapanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tsukazaki Hospital, Himeji 671-1227, JapanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tsukazaki Hospital, Himeji 671-1227, JapanThe present study aims to describe the use of machine learning (ML) in predicting the occurrence of postoperative refraction after cataract surgery and compares the accuracy of this method to conventional intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas. In total, 3331 eyes from 2010 patients were assessed. The objects were divided into training data and test data. The constants for the IOL power calculation formulas and model training for ML were optimized using training data. Then, the occurrence of postoperative refraction was predicted using conventional formulas, or ML models were calculated using the test data. We evaluated the SRK/T formula, Haigis formula, Holladay 1 formula, Hoffer Q formula, and Barrett Universal II formula (BU-II); similar to ML methods, we assessed support vector regression (SVR), random forest regression (RFR), gradient boosting regression (GBR), and neural network (NN). Among the conventional formulas, BU-II had the lowest mean and median absolute error of prediction. Therefore, we compared the accuracy of our method with that of BU-II. The absolute errors of some ML methods were lower than those of BU-II. However, no statistically significant difference was observed. Thus, the accuracy of our method was not inferior to that of BU-II.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/5/1103IOL power calculationmachine learninggradient booting regression (GBR)neural networksupport vector regression (SVR)random forest regression (RFR)
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tomofusa Yamauchi
Hitoshi Tabuchi
Kosuke Takase
Hiroki Masumoto
spellingShingle Tomofusa Yamauchi
Hitoshi Tabuchi
Kosuke Takase
Hiroki Masumoto
Use of a Machine Learning Method in Predicting Refraction after Cataract Surgery
Journal of Clinical Medicine
IOL power calculation
machine learning
gradient booting regression (GBR)
neural network
support vector regression (SVR)
random forest regression (RFR)
author_facet Tomofusa Yamauchi
Hitoshi Tabuchi
Kosuke Takase
Hiroki Masumoto
author_sort Tomofusa Yamauchi
title Use of a Machine Learning Method in Predicting Refraction after Cataract Surgery
title_short Use of a Machine Learning Method in Predicting Refraction after Cataract Surgery
title_full Use of a Machine Learning Method in Predicting Refraction after Cataract Surgery
title_fullStr Use of a Machine Learning Method in Predicting Refraction after Cataract Surgery
title_full_unstemmed Use of a Machine Learning Method in Predicting Refraction after Cataract Surgery
title_sort use of a machine learning method in predicting refraction after cataract surgery
publisher MDPI AG
series Journal of Clinical Medicine
issn 2077-0383
publishDate 2021-03-01
description The present study aims to describe the use of machine learning (ML) in predicting the occurrence of postoperative refraction after cataract surgery and compares the accuracy of this method to conventional intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas. In total, 3331 eyes from 2010 patients were assessed. The objects were divided into training data and test data. The constants for the IOL power calculation formulas and model training for ML were optimized using training data. Then, the occurrence of postoperative refraction was predicted using conventional formulas, or ML models were calculated using the test data. We evaluated the SRK/T formula, Haigis formula, Holladay 1 formula, Hoffer Q formula, and Barrett Universal II formula (BU-II); similar to ML methods, we assessed support vector regression (SVR), random forest regression (RFR), gradient boosting regression (GBR), and neural network (NN). Among the conventional formulas, BU-II had the lowest mean and median absolute error of prediction. Therefore, we compared the accuracy of our method with that of BU-II. The absolute errors of some ML methods were lower than those of BU-II. However, no statistically significant difference was observed. Thus, the accuracy of our method was not inferior to that of BU-II.
topic IOL power calculation
machine learning
gradient booting regression (GBR)
neural network
support vector regression (SVR)
random forest regression (RFR)
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/5/1103
work_keys_str_mv AT tomofusayamauchi useofamachinelearningmethodinpredictingrefractionaftercataractsurgery
AT hitoshitabuchi useofamachinelearningmethodinpredictingrefractionaftercataractsurgery
AT kosuketakase useofamachinelearningmethodinpredictingrefractionaftercataractsurgery
AT hirokimasumoto useofamachinelearningmethodinpredictingrefractionaftercataractsurgery
_version_ 1724229608952299520