Why Does Empathy Matter for Morality?
In this paper we discuss Prinz’s Kantian arguments in “Is Empathy Necessary for Morality?” (2011). They purport to show that empathy is not necessary for morality because it is not part of the capacities required for moral competence and it can bias moral judgment. First, we show that even conceding...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Spanish |
Published: |
Sociedad Argentina de Análisis Filosófico (SADAF)
2019-05-01
|
Series: | Análisis Filosófico |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://analisisfilosofico.org/index.php/af/article/view/310 |
id |
doaj-3fc0373872374350a2320ee45260b792 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-3fc0373872374350a2320ee45260b7922020-11-25T03:48:48ZspaSociedad Argentina de Análisis Filosófico (SADAF)Análisis Filosófico0326-13011851-96362019-05-0139152610.36446/af.2019.310Why Does Empathy Matter for Morality?Carme Isern-Mas0Antoni Gomila1University of the Balearic IslandsUniversity of the Balearic IslandsIn this paper we discuss Prinz’s Kantian arguments in “Is Empathy Necessary for Morality?” (2011). They purport to show that empathy is not necessary for morality because it is not part of the capacities required for moral competence and it can bias moral judgment. First, we show that even conceding Prinz his notions of empathy and moral competence, empathy still plays a role in moral competence. Second, we argue that moral competence is not limited to moral judgment. Third, we reject Prinz’s notion of empathy because it is too restrictive, in requiring emotional matching. We conclude that once morality and empathy are properly understood, empathy’s role in morality is vindicated. Morality is not reduced to a form of rational judgment, but it necessarily presupposes pro-social preferences and motivation and sensitivity to inter-subjective demands.http://analisisfilosofico.org/index.php/af/article/view/310moral competencemoralityempathysympathymoral judgment |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
Spanish |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Carme Isern-Mas Antoni Gomila |
spellingShingle |
Carme Isern-Mas Antoni Gomila Why Does Empathy Matter for Morality? Análisis Filosófico moral competence morality empathy sympathy moral judgment |
author_facet |
Carme Isern-Mas Antoni Gomila |
author_sort |
Carme Isern-Mas |
title |
Why Does Empathy Matter for Morality? |
title_short |
Why Does Empathy Matter for Morality? |
title_full |
Why Does Empathy Matter for Morality? |
title_fullStr |
Why Does Empathy Matter for Morality? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Why Does Empathy Matter for Morality? |
title_sort |
why does empathy matter for morality? |
publisher |
Sociedad Argentina de Análisis Filosófico (SADAF) |
series |
Análisis Filosófico |
issn |
0326-1301 1851-9636 |
publishDate |
2019-05-01 |
description |
In this paper we discuss Prinz’s Kantian arguments in “Is Empathy Necessary for Morality?” (2011). They purport to show that empathy is not necessary for morality because it is not part of the capacities required for moral competence and it can bias moral judgment. First, we show that even conceding Prinz his notions of empathy and moral competence, empathy still plays a role in moral competence. Second, we argue that moral competence is not limited to moral judgment. Third, we reject Prinz’s notion of empathy because it is too restrictive, in requiring emotional matching. We conclude that once morality and empathy are properly understood, empathy’s role in morality is vindicated. Morality is not reduced to a form of rational judgment, but it necessarily presupposes pro-social preferences and motivation and sensitivity to inter-subjective demands. |
topic |
moral competence morality empathy sympathy moral judgment |
url |
http://analisisfilosofico.org/index.php/af/article/view/310 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT carmeisernmas whydoesempathymatterformorality AT antonigomila whydoesempathymatterformorality |
_version_ |
1724497068088623104 |