The Construct Validity of Vallerand’s Academic Motivation Scale (AMS)

It seems that the academic motivation structure is affected by cultural factors. Many studies have examined the factorial structure of the academic motivation scale (AMS), and the results showed different factorial structures of AMS (e.g., Taghipour Ali Hosein et al. (EL-yazidi and Louzani, 2017) co...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Salem Ali Salem Algharaibeh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2021-01-01
Series:Education Research International
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5546794
id doaj-3fb46fdd4c4f40f9ae56c08638654f17
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3fb46fdd4c4f40f9ae56c08638654f172021-04-19T00:04:55ZengHindawi LimitedEducation Research International2090-40102021-01-01202110.1155/2021/5546794The Construct Validity of Vallerand’s Academic Motivation Scale (AMS)Salem Ali Salem Algharaibeh0Department of Educational SciencesIt seems that the academic motivation structure is affected by cultural factors. Many studies have examined the factorial structure of the academic motivation scale (AMS), and the results showed different factorial structures of AMS (e.g., Taghipour Ali Hosein et al. (EL-yazidi and Louzani, 2017) concluded that the scale consists of two dimensions; Natalya and Purwanto (2018) concluded that it consists of three dimensions; Alruaili (2020) concluded that it consists of four dimensions; Abu Awad (2009) concluded that the scale consists of six dimensions). The AMS is one of the most widely used academic motivation measures across the world. It was built on the basis of the self-determination theory. The current study aimed at investigating the factorial structure of the AMS using the exploratory factor analysis (PCA) and the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The AMS was applied to a sample of 401 university students. The results of PCA suggested a three-factor solution (intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, and Amotivation), and CFA was conducted for three competing structures (three factors, five factors, and seven factors); the results confirmed the three-factor solution for the AMS. The results also showed that the AMS dimensions had good alpha coefficient values which were greater than the acceptable cut-off value of 0.7. In conclusion, the Jordanian version of the AMS is a valid scale that consists of 24 items loaded on three factors (intrinsic, extrinsic, and Amotivation) for measuring academic motivation.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5546794
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Salem Ali Salem Algharaibeh
spellingShingle Salem Ali Salem Algharaibeh
The Construct Validity of Vallerand’s Academic Motivation Scale (AMS)
Education Research International
author_facet Salem Ali Salem Algharaibeh
author_sort Salem Ali Salem Algharaibeh
title The Construct Validity of Vallerand’s Academic Motivation Scale (AMS)
title_short The Construct Validity of Vallerand’s Academic Motivation Scale (AMS)
title_full The Construct Validity of Vallerand’s Academic Motivation Scale (AMS)
title_fullStr The Construct Validity of Vallerand’s Academic Motivation Scale (AMS)
title_full_unstemmed The Construct Validity of Vallerand’s Academic Motivation Scale (AMS)
title_sort construct validity of vallerand’s academic motivation scale (ams)
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Education Research International
issn 2090-4010
publishDate 2021-01-01
description It seems that the academic motivation structure is affected by cultural factors. Many studies have examined the factorial structure of the academic motivation scale (AMS), and the results showed different factorial structures of AMS (e.g., Taghipour Ali Hosein et al. (EL-yazidi and Louzani, 2017) concluded that the scale consists of two dimensions; Natalya and Purwanto (2018) concluded that it consists of three dimensions; Alruaili (2020) concluded that it consists of four dimensions; Abu Awad (2009) concluded that the scale consists of six dimensions). The AMS is one of the most widely used academic motivation measures across the world. It was built on the basis of the self-determination theory. The current study aimed at investigating the factorial structure of the AMS using the exploratory factor analysis (PCA) and the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The AMS was applied to a sample of 401 university students. The results of PCA suggested a three-factor solution (intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, and Amotivation), and CFA was conducted for three competing structures (three factors, five factors, and seven factors); the results confirmed the three-factor solution for the AMS. The results also showed that the AMS dimensions had good alpha coefficient values which were greater than the acceptable cut-off value of 0.7. In conclusion, the Jordanian version of the AMS is a valid scale that consists of 24 items loaded on three factors (intrinsic, extrinsic, and Amotivation) for measuring academic motivation.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5546794
work_keys_str_mv AT salemalisalemalgharaibeh theconstructvalidityofvallerandsacademicmotivationscaleams
AT salemalisalemalgharaibeh constructvalidityofvallerandsacademicmotivationscaleams
_version_ 1714674198993960960