Cultural Differences in Strength of Conformity Explained Through Pathogen Stress: A Statistical Test Using Hierarchical Bayesian Estimation

The severity of the environment has been found to have played a selective pressure in the development of human behavior and psychology, and the historical prevalence of pathogens relate to cultural differences in group-oriented psychological mechanisms, such as collectivism and conformity to the in-...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yutaka Horita, Masanori Takezawa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-10-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01921/full
id doaj-3f98b14e1674471cbd2f7a051bd1dda4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3f98b14e1674471cbd2f7a051bd1dda42020-11-24T22:07:55ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782018-10-01910.3389/fpsyg.2018.01921399830Cultural Differences in Strength of Conformity Explained Through Pathogen Stress: A Statistical Test Using Hierarchical Bayesian EstimationYutaka Horita0Masanori Takezawa1Department of Psychology, Teikyo University, Tokyo, JapanDepartment of Behavioral Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, JapanThe severity of the environment has been found to have played a selective pressure in the development of human behavior and psychology, and the historical prevalence of pathogens relate to cultural differences in group-oriented psychological mechanisms, such as collectivism and conformity to the in-group. However, previous studies have also proposed that the effectiveness of institutions, rather than pathogen stress, can account for regional variation in group-oriented psychological mechanisms. Moreover, previous studies using nations as units of analysis may have suffered from a problem of statistical non-independence, namely, Galton’s problem. The present study tested whether or not regional variation in pathogen stress, rather than government effectiveness, affected collectivism and conformity to social norms by adjusting the effect of global regions using hierarchical Bayesian estimation. We found that the overall effect of pathogen stress remained significant in only one out of the four indices of the regional variability of conformity, and the effects of the government effectiveness also disappeared. Instead, we found that significant effects of both pathogen stress and government effectiveness in specific regions of the world, but these effects were not stable across the measurements. These results indicate that both the effects of pathogen stress and government effectiveness need further reevaluation.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01921/fullcollectivismconformitypathogen stressinstitutionGalton’s problemhierarchical model
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yutaka Horita
Masanori Takezawa
spellingShingle Yutaka Horita
Masanori Takezawa
Cultural Differences in Strength of Conformity Explained Through Pathogen Stress: A Statistical Test Using Hierarchical Bayesian Estimation
Frontiers in Psychology
collectivism
conformity
pathogen stress
institution
Galton’s problem
hierarchical model
author_facet Yutaka Horita
Masanori Takezawa
author_sort Yutaka Horita
title Cultural Differences in Strength of Conformity Explained Through Pathogen Stress: A Statistical Test Using Hierarchical Bayesian Estimation
title_short Cultural Differences in Strength of Conformity Explained Through Pathogen Stress: A Statistical Test Using Hierarchical Bayesian Estimation
title_full Cultural Differences in Strength of Conformity Explained Through Pathogen Stress: A Statistical Test Using Hierarchical Bayesian Estimation
title_fullStr Cultural Differences in Strength of Conformity Explained Through Pathogen Stress: A Statistical Test Using Hierarchical Bayesian Estimation
title_full_unstemmed Cultural Differences in Strength of Conformity Explained Through Pathogen Stress: A Statistical Test Using Hierarchical Bayesian Estimation
title_sort cultural differences in strength of conformity explained through pathogen stress: a statistical test using hierarchical bayesian estimation
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2018-10-01
description The severity of the environment has been found to have played a selective pressure in the development of human behavior and psychology, and the historical prevalence of pathogens relate to cultural differences in group-oriented psychological mechanisms, such as collectivism and conformity to the in-group. However, previous studies have also proposed that the effectiveness of institutions, rather than pathogen stress, can account for regional variation in group-oriented psychological mechanisms. Moreover, previous studies using nations as units of analysis may have suffered from a problem of statistical non-independence, namely, Galton’s problem. The present study tested whether or not regional variation in pathogen stress, rather than government effectiveness, affected collectivism and conformity to social norms by adjusting the effect of global regions using hierarchical Bayesian estimation. We found that the overall effect of pathogen stress remained significant in only one out of the four indices of the regional variability of conformity, and the effects of the government effectiveness also disappeared. Instead, we found that significant effects of both pathogen stress and government effectiveness in specific regions of the world, but these effects were not stable across the measurements. These results indicate that both the effects of pathogen stress and government effectiveness need further reevaluation.
topic collectivism
conformity
pathogen stress
institution
Galton’s problem
hierarchical model
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01921/full
work_keys_str_mv AT yutakahorita culturaldifferencesinstrengthofconformityexplainedthroughpathogenstressastatisticaltestusinghierarchicalbayesianestimation
AT masanoritakezawa culturaldifferencesinstrengthofconformityexplainedthroughpathogenstressastatisticaltestusinghierarchicalbayesianestimation
_version_ 1725818613266382848