Comparison of single-port and conventional laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection

• Main Authors: Nikolaj Nerup, Steffen Rosenstock, Orhan Bulut
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2018-01-01
• Series: Journal of Minimal Access Surgery
• Subjects: Colorectal surgery; minimal invasive surgery; rectal neoplasms; retrospective study; safety
• Online Access: http://www.journalofmas.com/article.asp?issn=0972-9941;year=2018;volume=14;issue=1;spage=27;epage=32;aulast=Nerup
• ISSN: 0972-9941; 1998-3921

Background: Within the last two decades, surgical treatment of colorectal cancer has changed dramatically from large abdominal incisions to minimal access surgery. In the recent years, single port (SP) surgery has spawned from conventional laparoscopic surgery. The purpose of this study was to compare conventional with SP laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection (LAPR) for rectal cancer. Patients and Methods: This was a single-center non-randomised retrospective comparative study of prospectively collected data on 53 patients who underwent abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer; 41 with conventional laparoscopy and 12 with SP surgery. Results: Patients' characteristics were in general comparable, but patients in the conventional laparoscopy-group had a significantly higher American Society of Anesthesiologists-score. The operative time was slightly shorter in the conventional laparoscopy-group, but no differences were found in oncological margins of the resected specimen, in length of stay or readmission rate. Conclusions: SP LAPR appeared to be safe and feasible in selected patients. Adequate oncologic resections can be performed with acceptable morbidity and mortality. Larger randomised controlled trials with longer follow-up are needed to determine the beneficial role of this new procedure.