Recognizing Associative Values in World Heritage

With the increased interest in the commemoration of sites of memory, including battlefields and sites of genocide, UNESCO’s World Heritage Centre commissioned an expert study in 2018 to clarify the way criterion (vi) is applied to recognize the associative values at nominated properties. The study w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Christina Cameron
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Editura ARC 2020-06-01
Series:Plural: History, Culture, Society
Online Access:https://plural.upsc.md/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Christina-Cameron.pdf
id doaj-3f831b46ab0248d49a55efcbe7499a04
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3f831b46ab0248d49a55efcbe7499a042020-11-25T03:29:27ZdeuEditura ARCPlural: History, Culture, Society2345-12622345-184X2020-06-0181173610.37710/plural.v8i1_3Recognizing Associative Values in World HeritageChristina Cameron0CanadaWith the increased interest in the commemoration of sites of memory, including battlefields and sites of genocide, UNESCO’s World Heritage Centre commissioned an expert study in 2018 to clarify the way criterion (vi) is applied to recognize the associative values at nominated properties. The study was intended to facilitate knowledge-based decision-making for properties with strong associative values. This paper outlines the lack of clarity and the World Heritage Committee’s concerns about the definition and application of criterion (vi). After documenting the evolution in the wording of criterion (vi), the article explains the important contribution of the 2018 report, in particular its analysis of 240 statements of Outstanding Universal Value that have used criterion (vi). It concludes that further studies should focus on the analysis of the 240 World Heritage sites using precedents from previous inscriptions and case studies to theorize the six associations of criterion (vi), namely events, living traditions, ideas, beliefs, artistic works and literary works. Such research should also address methodologies for protecting and managing the attributes of associative values. These additional studies would support more consistent and knowledgeable use of criterion (vi) and thereby enhance the recognition and protection of associative values at World Heritage sites.https://plural.upsc.md/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Christina-Cameron.pdf
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Christina Cameron
spellingShingle Christina Cameron
Recognizing Associative Values in World Heritage
Plural: History, Culture, Society
author_facet Christina Cameron
author_sort Christina Cameron
title Recognizing Associative Values in World Heritage
title_short Recognizing Associative Values in World Heritage
title_full Recognizing Associative Values in World Heritage
title_fullStr Recognizing Associative Values in World Heritage
title_full_unstemmed Recognizing Associative Values in World Heritage
title_sort recognizing associative values in world heritage
publisher Editura ARC
series Plural: History, Culture, Society
issn 2345-1262
2345-184X
publishDate 2020-06-01
description With the increased interest in the commemoration of sites of memory, including battlefields and sites of genocide, UNESCO’s World Heritage Centre commissioned an expert study in 2018 to clarify the way criterion (vi) is applied to recognize the associative values at nominated properties. The study was intended to facilitate knowledge-based decision-making for properties with strong associative values. This paper outlines the lack of clarity and the World Heritage Committee’s concerns about the definition and application of criterion (vi). After documenting the evolution in the wording of criterion (vi), the article explains the important contribution of the 2018 report, in particular its analysis of 240 statements of Outstanding Universal Value that have used criterion (vi). It concludes that further studies should focus on the analysis of the 240 World Heritage sites using precedents from previous inscriptions and case studies to theorize the six associations of criterion (vi), namely events, living traditions, ideas, beliefs, artistic works and literary works. Such research should also address methodologies for protecting and managing the attributes of associative values. These additional studies would support more consistent and knowledgeable use of criterion (vi) and thereby enhance the recognition and protection of associative values at World Heritage sites.
url https://plural.upsc.md/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Christina-Cameron.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT christinacameron recognizingassociativevaluesinworldheritage
_version_ 1724579088539058176