Comparison between radiofrequency ablation combined with mifepristone and radiofrequency ablation for large uterine fibroids

Objective To evaluate the clinical outcomes of transvaginal ultrasound-guided (US-guided) radiofrequency ablation (RFA) combined with mifepristone for the treatment of large uterine fibroids. Methods Between June 2016 and December 2018, a total of 30 patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids (≥5cm)...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ning Hai, Qingxiang Hou, Xiangping Dong, Ruijun Guo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2021-01-01
Series:International Journal of Hyperthermia
Subjects:
rfa
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02656736.2021.1922763
id doaj-3f77d8e17ebe48998d5cb8643cf16831
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3f77d8e17ebe48998d5cb8643cf168312021-06-02T08:05:28ZengTaylor & Francis GroupInternational Journal of Hyperthermia0265-67361464-51572021-01-0138177778010.1080/02656736.2021.19227631922763Comparison between radiofrequency ablation combined with mifepristone and radiofrequency ablation for large uterine fibroidsNing Hai0Qingxiang Hou1Xiangping Dong2Ruijun Guo3Department of Ultrasound, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital Capital Medical UniversityDepartment of Gynecology, the PLA Rocket Force General HospitalDepartment of Gynecology, the PLA Rocket Force General HospitalDepartment of Ultrasound, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital Capital Medical UniversityObjective To evaluate the clinical outcomes of transvaginal ultrasound-guided (US-guided) radiofrequency ablation (RFA) combined with mifepristone for the treatment of large uterine fibroids. Methods Between June 2016 and December 2018, a total of 30 patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids (≥5cm) who underwent transvaginal US-guided RFA combined with mifepristone were included in this retrospective study. A matching cohort of 30 patients underwent transvaginal US-guided RFA without mifepristone as controls. The technical efficacy, complications and mid-term treatment effectiveness were assessed and compared with the controls. Results The mean volume of uterine fibroid was 168.3 ± 40.1 cm3. The mean ablation time was 23.5 ± 11.3 min in the combined treatment group, which was demonstrably less than that of the RFA group, which was 45.7 ± 6.8 min. The mean number of punctures was 2.2 ± 0.6 in the combined treatment group, which was significantly less than that of the RFA group. No major complications occurred. The mean percentages of regression of fibroid at 3 and 12 months after the course of the combined treatment were 73.3% and 90.1%, respectively, which were significantly more than those of the RFA group. Quality of life and symptom scores improved in both groups but to a greater extent in the combined treatment group. Conclusions US-guided RFA combined with mifepristone might be a simple, safe and effective alternative for the treatment of large uterine fibroids.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02656736.2021.1922763ultrasound-guidedrfauterine fibroidsmifepristonemid-term effect
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ning Hai
Qingxiang Hou
Xiangping Dong
Ruijun Guo
spellingShingle Ning Hai
Qingxiang Hou
Xiangping Dong
Ruijun Guo
Comparison between radiofrequency ablation combined with mifepristone and radiofrequency ablation for large uterine fibroids
International Journal of Hyperthermia
ultrasound-guided
rfa
uterine fibroids
mifepristone
mid-term effect
author_facet Ning Hai
Qingxiang Hou
Xiangping Dong
Ruijun Guo
author_sort Ning Hai
title Comparison between radiofrequency ablation combined with mifepristone and radiofrequency ablation for large uterine fibroids
title_short Comparison between radiofrequency ablation combined with mifepristone and radiofrequency ablation for large uterine fibroids
title_full Comparison between radiofrequency ablation combined with mifepristone and radiofrequency ablation for large uterine fibroids
title_fullStr Comparison between radiofrequency ablation combined with mifepristone and radiofrequency ablation for large uterine fibroids
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between radiofrequency ablation combined with mifepristone and radiofrequency ablation for large uterine fibroids
title_sort comparison between radiofrequency ablation combined with mifepristone and radiofrequency ablation for large uterine fibroids
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series International Journal of Hyperthermia
issn 0265-6736
1464-5157
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Objective To evaluate the clinical outcomes of transvaginal ultrasound-guided (US-guided) radiofrequency ablation (RFA) combined with mifepristone for the treatment of large uterine fibroids. Methods Between June 2016 and December 2018, a total of 30 patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids (≥5cm) who underwent transvaginal US-guided RFA combined with mifepristone were included in this retrospective study. A matching cohort of 30 patients underwent transvaginal US-guided RFA without mifepristone as controls. The technical efficacy, complications and mid-term treatment effectiveness were assessed and compared with the controls. Results The mean volume of uterine fibroid was 168.3 ± 40.1 cm3. The mean ablation time was 23.5 ± 11.3 min in the combined treatment group, which was demonstrably less than that of the RFA group, which was 45.7 ± 6.8 min. The mean number of punctures was 2.2 ± 0.6 in the combined treatment group, which was significantly less than that of the RFA group. No major complications occurred. The mean percentages of regression of fibroid at 3 and 12 months after the course of the combined treatment were 73.3% and 90.1%, respectively, which were significantly more than those of the RFA group. Quality of life and symptom scores improved in both groups but to a greater extent in the combined treatment group. Conclusions US-guided RFA combined with mifepristone might be a simple, safe and effective alternative for the treatment of large uterine fibroids.
topic ultrasound-guided
rfa
uterine fibroids
mifepristone
mid-term effect
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02656736.2021.1922763
work_keys_str_mv AT ninghai comparisonbetweenradiofrequencyablationcombinedwithmifepristoneandradiofrequencyablationforlargeuterinefibroids
AT qingxianghou comparisonbetweenradiofrequencyablationcombinedwithmifepristoneandradiofrequencyablationforlargeuterinefibroids
AT xiangpingdong comparisonbetweenradiofrequencyablationcombinedwithmifepristoneandradiofrequencyablationforlargeuterinefibroids
AT ruijunguo comparisonbetweenradiofrequencyablationcombinedwithmifepristoneandradiofrequencyablationforlargeuterinefibroids
_version_ 1721406686529323008