Comparison between radiofrequency ablation combined with mifepristone and radiofrequency ablation for large uterine fibroids
Objective To evaluate the clinical outcomes of transvaginal ultrasound-guided (US-guided) radiofrequency ablation (RFA) combined with mifepristone for the treatment of large uterine fibroids. Methods Between June 2016 and December 2018, a total of 30 patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids (≥5cm)...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2021-01-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Hyperthermia |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02656736.2021.1922763 |
id |
doaj-3f77d8e17ebe48998d5cb8643cf16831 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-3f77d8e17ebe48998d5cb8643cf168312021-06-02T08:05:28ZengTaylor & Francis GroupInternational Journal of Hyperthermia0265-67361464-51572021-01-0138177778010.1080/02656736.2021.19227631922763Comparison between radiofrequency ablation combined with mifepristone and radiofrequency ablation for large uterine fibroidsNing Hai0Qingxiang Hou1Xiangping Dong2Ruijun Guo3Department of Ultrasound, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital Capital Medical UniversityDepartment of Gynecology, the PLA Rocket Force General HospitalDepartment of Gynecology, the PLA Rocket Force General HospitalDepartment of Ultrasound, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital Capital Medical UniversityObjective To evaluate the clinical outcomes of transvaginal ultrasound-guided (US-guided) radiofrequency ablation (RFA) combined with mifepristone for the treatment of large uterine fibroids. Methods Between June 2016 and December 2018, a total of 30 patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids (≥5cm) who underwent transvaginal US-guided RFA combined with mifepristone were included in this retrospective study. A matching cohort of 30 patients underwent transvaginal US-guided RFA without mifepristone as controls. The technical efficacy, complications and mid-term treatment effectiveness were assessed and compared with the controls. Results The mean volume of uterine fibroid was 168.3 ± 40.1 cm3. The mean ablation time was 23.5 ± 11.3 min in the combined treatment group, which was demonstrably less than that of the RFA group, which was 45.7 ± 6.8 min. The mean number of punctures was 2.2 ± 0.6 in the combined treatment group, which was significantly less than that of the RFA group. No major complications occurred. The mean percentages of regression of fibroid at 3 and 12 months after the course of the combined treatment were 73.3% and 90.1%, respectively, which were significantly more than those of the RFA group. Quality of life and symptom scores improved in both groups but to a greater extent in the combined treatment group. Conclusions US-guided RFA combined with mifepristone might be a simple, safe and effective alternative for the treatment of large uterine fibroids.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02656736.2021.1922763ultrasound-guidedrfauterine fibroidsmifepristonemid-term effect |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Ning Hai Qingxiang Hou Xiangping Dong Ruijun Guo |
spellingShingle |
Ning Hai Qingxiang Hou Xiangping Dong Ruijun Guo Comparison between radiofrequency ablation combined with mifepristone and radiofrequency ablation for large uterine fibroids International Journal of Hyperthermia ultrasound-guided rfa uterine fibroids mifepristone mid-term effect |
author_facet |
Ning Hai Qingxiang Hou Xiangping Dong Ruijun Guo |
author_sort |
Ning Hai |
title |
Comparison between radiofrequency ablation combined with mifepristone and radiofrequency ablation for large uterine fibroids |
title_short |
Comparison between radiofrequency ablation combined with mifepristone and radiofrequency ablation for large uterine fibroids |
title_full |
Comparison between radiofrequency ablation combined with mifepristone and radiofrequency ablation for large uterine fibroids |
title_fullStr |
Comparison between radiofrequency ablation combined with mifepristone and radiofrequency ablation for large uterine fibroids |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison between radiofrequency ablation combined with mifepristone and radiofrequency ablation for large uterine fibroids |
title_sort |
comparison between radiofrequency ablation combined with mifepristone and radiofrequency ablation for large uterine fibroids |
publisher |
Taylor & Francis Group |
series |
International Journal of Hyperthermia |
issn |
0265-6736 1464-5157 |
publishDate |
2021-01-01 |
description |
Objective To evaluate the clinical outcomes of transvaginal ultrasound-guided (US-guided) radiofrequency ablation (RFA) combined with mifepristone for the treatment of large uterine fibroids. Methods Between June 2016 and December 2018, a total of 30 patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids (≥5cm) who underwent transvaginal US-guided RFA combined with mifepristone were included in this retrospective study. A matching cohort of 30 patients underwent transvaginal US-guided RFA without mifepristone as controls. The technical efficacy, complications and mid-term treatment effectiveness were assessed and compared with the controls. Results The mean volume of uterine fibroid was 168.3 ± 40.1 cm3. The mean ablation time was 23.5 ± 11.3 min in the combined treatment group, which was demonstrably less than that of the RFA group, which was 45.7 ± 6.8 min. The mean number of punctures was 2.2 ± 0.6 in the combined treatment group, which was significantly less than that of the RFA group. No major complications occurred. The mean percentages of regression of fibroid at 3 and 12 months after the course of the combined treatment were 73.3% and 90.1%, respectively, which were significantly more than those of the RFA group. Quality of life and symptom scores improved in both groups but to a greater extent in the combined treatment group. Conclusions US-guided RFA combined with mifepristone might be a simple, safe and effective alternative for the treatment of large uterine fibroids. |
topic |
ultrasound-guided rfa uterine fibroids mifepristone mid-term effect |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02656736.2021.1922763 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT ninghai comparisonbetweenradiofrequencyablationcombinedwithmifepristoneandradiofrequencyablationforlargeuterinefibroids AT qingxianghou comparisonbetweenradiofrequencyablationcombinedwithmifepristoneandradiofrequencyablationforlargeuterinefibroids AT xiangpingdong comparisonbetweenradiofrequencyablationcombinedwithmifepristoneandradiofrequencyablationforlargeuterinefibroids AT ruijunguo comparisonbetweenradiofrequencyablationcombinedwithmifepristoneandradiofrequencyablationforlargeuterinefibroids |
_version_ |
1721406686529323008 |