Mitochondrial DNA Fitness Depends on Nuclear Genetic Background in Drosophila

Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) has been one of the most extensively studied molecules in ecological, evolutionary and clinical genetics. In its early application in evolutionary genetics, mtDNA was assumed to be a selectively neutral marker conferring negligible fitness consequences for its host. However...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jim A. Mossman, Jennifer Y. Ge, Freddy Navarro, David M. Rand
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford University Press 2019-04-01
Series:G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://g3journal.org/lookup/doi/10.1534/g3.119.400067
id doaj-3f72ff389da04527abd842fa695a81e1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3f72ff389da04527abd842fa695a81e12021-07-02T05:22:18ZengOxford University PressG3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics2160-18362019-04-01941175118810.1534/g3.119.40006719Mitochondrial DNA Fitness Depends on Nuclear Genetic Background in DrosophilaJim A. MossmanJennifer Y. GeFreddy NavarroDavid M. RandMitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) has been one of the most extensively studied molecules in ecological, evolutionary and clinical genetics. In its early application in evolutionary genetics, mtDNA was assumed to be a selectively neutral marker conferring negligible fitness consequences for its host. However, this dogma has been overturned in recent years due to now extensive evidence for non-neutral evolutionary dynamics. Since mtDNA proteins physically interact with nuclear proteins to provide the mitochondrial machinery for aerobic ATP production, among other cell functions, co-variation of the respective genes is predicted to affect organismal fitness. To test this hypothesis we used an mtDNA-nuclear DNA introgression model in Drosophila melanogaster to test the fitness of genotypes in perturbation-reperturbation population cages and in a non-competitive assay for female fecundity. Genotypes consisted of both conspecific and heterospecific mtDNA-nDNA constructs, with either D. melanogaster or D. simulans mtDNAs on two alternative D. melanogaster nuclear backgrounds, to investigate mitonuclear genetic interactions (G x G effects). We found considerable variation between nuclear genetic backgrounds on the selection of mtDNA haplotypes. In addition, there was variation in the selection on mtDNAs pre- and post- reperturbation, demonstrating overall poor repeatability of selection. There was a strong influence of nuclear background on non-competitive fecundity across all the mtDNA species types. In only one of the four cage types did we see a significant fecundity effect between genotypes that could help explain the respective change in genotype frequency over generational time. We discuss these results in the context of G x G interactions and the possible influence of stochastic environments on mtDNA-nDNA selection.http://g3journal.org/lookup/doi/10.1534/g3.119.400067mitochondrial DNAepistasisfitnessDrosophilaintrogressionhaplotypereperturbation cages
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jim A. Mossman
Jennifer Y. Ge
Freddy Navarro
David M. Rand
spellingShingle Jim A. Mossman
Jennifer Y. Ge
Freddy Navarro
David M. Rand
Mitochondrial DNA Fitness Depends on Nuclear Genetic Background in Drosophila
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
mitochondrial DNA
epistasis
fitness
Drosophila
introgression
haplotype
reperturbation cages
author_facet Jim A. Mossman
Jennifer Y. Ge
Freddy Navarro
David M. Rand
author_sort Jim A. Mossman
title Mitochondrial DNA Fitness Depends on Nuclear Genetic Background in Drosophila
title_short Mitochondrial DNA Fitness Depends on Nuclear Genetic Background in Drosophila
title_full Mitochondrial DNA Fitness Depends on Nuclear Genetic Background in Drosophila
title_fullStr Mitochondrial DNA Fitness Depends on Nuclear Genetic Background in Drosophila
title_full_unstemmed Mitochondrial DNA Fitness Depends on Nuclear Genetic Background in Drosophila
title_sort mitochondrial dna fitness depends on nuclear genetic background in drosophila
publisher Oxford University Press
series G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
issn 2160-1836
publishDate 2019-04-01
description Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) has been one of the most extensively studied molecules in ecological, evolutionary and clinical genetics. In its early application in evolutionary genetics, mtDNA was assumed to be a selectively neutral marker conferring negligible fitness consequences for its host. However, this dogma has been overturned in recent years due to now extensive evidence for non-neutral evolutionary dynamics. Since mtDNA proteins physically interact with nuclear proteins to provide the mitochondrial machinery for aerobic ATP production, among other cell functions, co-variation of the respective genes is predicted to affect organismal fitness. To test this hypothesis we used an mtDNA-nuclear DNA introgression model in Drosophila melanogaster to test the fitness of genotypes in perturbation-reperturbation population cages and in a non-competitive assay for female fecundity. Genotypes consisted of both conspecific and heterospecific mtDNA-nDNA constructs, with either D. melanogaster or D. simulans mtDNAs on two alternative D. melanogaster nuclear backgrounds, to investigate mitonuclear genetic interactions (G x G effects). We found considerable variation between nuclear genetic backgrounds on the selection of mtDNA haplotypes. In addition, there was variation in the selection on mtDNAs pre- and post- reperturbation, demonstrating overall poor repeatability of selection. There was a strong influence of nuclear background on non-competitive fecundity across all the mtDNA species types. In only one of the four cage types did we see a significant fecundity effect between genotypes that could help explain the respective change in genotype frequency over generational time. We discuss these results in the context of G x G interactions and the possible influence of stochastic environments on mtDNA-nDNA selection.
topic mitochondrial DNA
epistasis
fitness
Drosophila
introgression
haplotype
reperturbation cages
url http://g3journal.org/lookup/doi/10.1534/g3.119.400067
work_keys_str_mv AT jimamossman mitochondrialdnafitnessdependsonnucleargeneticbackgroundindrosophila
AT jenniferyge mitochondrialdnafitnessdependsonnucleargeneticbackgroundindrosophila
AT freddynavarro mitochondrialdnafitnessdependsonnucleargeneticbackgroundindrosophila
AT davidmrand mitochondrialdnafitnessdependsonnucleargeneticbackgroundindrosophila
_version_ 1721338769160798208