A painful matter: the sandal as a hitting implement in Athenian iconography

Abstract The article examines a series of images on Athenian ceramic vases in which sandals are depicted as a hitting implement. This iconographic motif appears mainly in two contexts: educational scenes, where an adult hits a subordinate, and erotic scenes, where the hitting action is almost always...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Yael Young
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer Nature 2020-08-01
Series:Humanities & Social Sciences Communications
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00558-z
id doaj-3f5b1fb761274c78ab3c33f7cdf89ed8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3f5b1fb761274c78ab3c33f7cdf89ed82021-08-15T11:34:05ZengSpringer NatureHumanities & Social Sciences Communications2662-99922020-08-017111110.1057/s41599-020-00558-zA painful matter: the sandal as a hitting implement in Athenian iconographyYael Young0The Open UniversityAbstract The article examines a series of images on Athenian ceramic vases in which sandals are depicted as a hitting implement. This iconographic motif appears mainly in two contexts: educational scenes, where an adult hits a subordinate, and erotic scenes, where the hitting action is almost always performed by males upon female prostitutes. The utilisation of this specific mundane object, rather than equally available others, for these violent acts is explored in light of psychologist James J. Gibson’s term “affordance”, which refers to the potentialities held by an object for a particular set of actions, stemming from its material properties. I suggest that the choice of the sandal is not arbitrary: it supports these aggressors’ desire to cause pain to those of lower status, thereby controlling and humiliating them. The affordances of the sandal, stemming from its shape and material and the inherent potentialities for action, are perceived and exploited by the hitters. Though not designed as a hitting implement, in the hands of these privileged figures in these specific situations, the mundane, ordinary sandal becomes the medium, a social agent, by which their control attains physical embodiment. Thanks to the Athenian vase painters, we are able to register and visualise latent affordances of the sandal that previously lay out of sight. It seems that in the context of Athenian society, the supposed dichotomy between the ordinary usage and the extraordinary violent usage of the sandal collapses. In this particular case, hitting with a sandal seems as ordinary as donning it in everyday use.https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00558-z
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yael Young
spellingShingle Yael Young
A painful matter: the sandal as a hitting implement in Athenian iconography
Humanities & Social Sciences Communications
author_facet Yael Young
author_sort Yael Young
title A painful matter: the sandal as a hitting implement in Athenian iconography
title_short A painful matter: the sandal as a hitting implement in Athenian iconography
title_full A painful matter: the sandal as a hitting implement in Athenian iconography
title_fullStr A painful matter: the sandal as a hitting implement in Athenian iconography
title_full_unstemmed A painful matter: the sandal as a hitting implement in Athenian iconography
title_sort painful matter: the sandal as a hitting implement in athenian iconography
publisher Springer Nature
series Humanities & Social Sciences Communications
issn 2662-9992
publishDate 2020-08-01
description Abstract The article examines a series of images on Athenian ceramic vases in which sandals are depicted as a hitting implement. This iconographic motif appears mainly in two contexts: educational scenes, where an adult hits a subordinate, and erotic scenes, where the hitting action is almost always performed by males upon female prostitutes. The utilisation of this specific mundane object, rather than equally available others, for these violent acts is explored in light of psychologist James J. Gibson’s term “affordance”, which refers to the potentialities held by an object for a particular set of actions, stemming from its material properties. I suggest that the choice of the sandal is not arbitrary: it supports these aggressors’ desire to cause pain to those of lower status, thereby controlling and humiliating them. The affordances of the sandal, stemming from its shape and material and the inherent potentialities for action, are perceived and exploited by the hitters. Though not designed as a hitting implement, in the hands of these privileged figures in these specific situations, the mundane, ordinary sandal becomes the medium, a social agent, by which their control attains physical embodiment. Thanks to the Athenian vase painters, we are able to register and visualise latent affordances of the sandal that previously lay out of sight. It seems that in the context of Athenian society, the supposed dichotomy between the ordinary usage and the extraordinary violent usage of the sandal collapses. In this particular case, hitting with a sandal seems as ordinary as donning it in everyday use.
url https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00558-z
work_keys_str_mv AT yaelyoung apainfulmatterthesandalasahittingimplementinathenianiconography
AT yaelyoung painfulmatterthesandalasahittingimplementinathenianiconography
_version_ 1721206621854498816