Measuring Maternal Mortality: Three Case Studies Using Verbal Autopsy with Different Platforms.

Accurate measurement of maternal mortality is needed to develop a greater understanding of the scale of the problem, to increase effectiveness of program planning and targeting, and to track progress. In the absence of good quality vital statistics, interim methods are used to measure maternal morta...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Siân L Curtis, Robert G Mswia, Emily H Weaver
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2015-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4546606?pdf=render
id doaj-3f52c53c333c4499ab2b8563bbdb03f0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3f52c53c333c4499ab2b8563bbdb03f02020-11-25T01:52:50ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-01108e013506210.1371/journal.pone.0135062Measuring Maternal Mortality: Three Case Studies Using Verbal Autopsy with Different Platforms.Siân L CurtisRobert G MswiaEmily H WeaverAccurate measurement of maternal mortality is needed to develop a greater understanding of the scale of the problem, to increase effectiveness of program planning and targeting, and to track progress. In the absence of good quality vital statistics, interim methods are used to measure maternal mortality. The purpose of this study is to document experience with three community-based interim methods that measure maternal mortality using verbal autopsy.This study uses a post-census mortality survey, a sample vital registration with verbal autopsy, and a large-scale household survey to summarize the measures of maternal mortality obtained from these three platforms, compares and contrasts the different methodologies employed, and evaluates strengths and weaknesses of each approach. Included is also a discussion of issues related to death identification and classification, estimating maternal mortality ratios and rates, sample sizes and periodicity of estimates, data quality, and cost.The sample sizes vary considerably between the three data sources and the number of maternal deaths identified through each platform was small. The proportion of deaths to women of reproductive age that are maternal deaths ranged from 8.8% to 17.3%. The maternal mortality rate was estimable using two of the platforms while obtaining an estimate of the maternal mortality ratio was only possible using one of the platforms. The percentage of maternal deaths due to direct obstetric causes ranged from 45.2% to 80.4%.This study documents experiences applying standard verbal autopsy methods to estimate maternal mortality and confirms that verbal autopsy is a feasible method for collecting maternal mortality data. None of these interim methods are likely to be suitable for detecting short term changes in mortality due to prohibitive sample size requirements, and thus, comprehensive and continuous civil registration systems to provide high quality vital statistics are essential in the long-term.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4546606?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Siân L Curtis
Robert G Mswia
Emily H Weaver
spellingShingle Siân L Curtis
Robert G Mswia
Emily H Weaver
Measuring Maternal Mortality: Three Case Studies Using Verbal Autopsy with Different Platforms.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Siân L Curtis
Robert G Mswia
Emily H Weaver
author_sort Siân L Curtis
title Measuring Maternal Mortality: Three Case Studies Using Verbal Autopsy with Different Platforms.
title_short Measuring Maternal Mortality: Three Case Studies Using Verbal Autopsy with Different Platforms.
title_full Measuring Maternal Mortality: Three Case Studies Using Verbal Autopsy with Different Platforms.
title_fullStr Measuring Maternal Mortality: Three Case Studies Using Verbal Autopsy with Different Platforms.
title_full_unstemmed Measuring Maternal Mortality: Three Case Studies Using Verbal Autopsy with Different Platforms.
title_sort measuring maternal mortality: three case studies using verbal autopsy with different platforms.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Accurate measurement of maternal mortality is needed to develop a greater understanding of the scale of the problem, to increase effectiveness of program planning and targeting, and to track progress. In the absence of good quality vital statistics, interim methods are used to measure maternal mortality. The purpose of this study is to document experience with three community-based interim methods that measure maternal mortality using verbal autopsy.This study uses a post-census mortality survey, a sample vital registration with verbal autopsy, and a large-scale household survey to summarize the measures of maternal mortality obtained from these three platforms, compares and contrasts the different methodologies employed, and evaluates strengths and weaknesses of each approach. Included is also a discussion of issues related to death identification and classification, estimating maternal mortality ratios and rates, sample sizes and periodicity of estimates, data quality, and cost.The sample sizes vary considerably between the three data sources and the number of maternal deaths identified through each platform was small. The proportion of deaths to women of reproductive age that are maternal deaths ranged from 8.8% to 17.3%. The maternal mortality rate was estimable using two of the platforms while obtaining an estimate of the maternal mortality ratio was only possible using one of the platforms. The percentage of maternal deaths due to direct obstetric causes ranged from 45.2% to 80.4%.This study documents experiences applying standard verbal autopsy methods to estimate maternal mortality and confirms that verbal autopsy is a feasible method for collecting maternal mortality data. None of these interim methods are likely to be suitable for detecting short term changes in mortality due to prohibitive sample size requirements, and thus, comprehensive and continuous civil registration systems to provide high quality vital statistics are essential in the long-term.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4546606?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT sianlcurtis measuringmaternalmortalitythreecasestudiesusingverbalautopsywithdifferentplatforms
AT robertgmswia measuringmaternalmortalitythreecasestudiesusingverbalautopsywithdifferentplatforms
AT emilyhweaver measuringmaternalmortalitythreecasestudiesusingverbalautopsywithdifferentplatforms
_version_ 1724992654063697920