The Appearance of The Infraorbital Canal and Infraorbital Ethmoid (Haller’s) Cells on Panoramic Radiography of Edentulous Patients

Objectives. The aim of the study is to detect the prevalence and the characteristics of infraorbital canal and Haller’s cells on panoramic radiography of edentulous patients. Methods. The study group comprised 291 panoramic radiographs of edentulous patients. Radiographs were interpreted for the vis...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Esra Yesilova, Ibrahim Sevki Bayrakdar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2018-01-01
Series:BioMed Research International
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/1293124
id doaj-3f4adba4c07647158fabab0646c7fe79
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3f4adba4c07647158fabab0646c7fe792020-11-25T00:45:26ZengHindawi LimitedBioMed Research International2314-61332314-61412018-01-01201810.1155/2018/12931241293124The Appearance of The Infraorbital Canal and Infraorbital Ethmoid (Haller’s) Cells on Panoramic Radiography of Edentulous PatientsEsra Yesilova0Ibrahim Sevki Bayrakdar1Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Eskişehir Osmangazi University, Eskişehir, TurkeyOral and Maxillofacial Radiology Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Eskişehir Osmangazi University, Eskişehir, TurkeyObjectives. The aim of the study is to detect the prevalence and the characteristics of infraorbital canal and Haller’s cells on panoramic radiography of edentulous patients. Methods. The study group comprised 291 panoramic radiographs of edentulous patients. Radiographs were interpreted for the visibility and characteristics of infraorbital canal and Haller’s cells. For classification of infraorbital canal, a method based on the image characteristics of the border of the canal (Types I, II, and III) was used. Haller’s cells were grouped according to the number and the shape of loculations. Results. Infraorbital canal was observed in 246 (84.6%) radiographs. The most prevalent of the observed canals were Type III for both sides (39.9 % for right and 32.3% for left side). The visibility of Haller’s cells was 23.7%. The frequencies of Haller’s cells’ visibility were approximately equal for both genders. There is no significant difference between genders for the visibility of infraorbital canal and Haller’s cells. Conclusions. The surgeons, implantologists, and radiologists should take into consideration infraorbital canal and Haller’s cell for planning implant surgery of maxillary anterior region and undefined orofacial pain for edentulous patients.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/1293124
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Esra Yesilova
Ibrahim Sevki Bayrakdar
spellingShingle Esra Yesilova
Ibrahim Sevki Bayrakdar
The Appearance of The Infraorbital Canal and Infraorbital Ethmoid (Haller’s) Cells on Panoramic Radiography of Edentulous Patients
BioMed Research International
author_facet Esra Yesilova
Ibrahim Sevki Bayrakdar
author_sort Esra Yesilova
title The Appearance of The Infraorbital Canal and Infraorbital Ethmoid (Haller’s) Cells on Panoramic Radiography of Edentulous Patients
title_short The Appearance of The Infraorbital Canal and Infraorbital Ethmoid (Haller’s) Cells on Panoramic Radiography of Edentulous Patients
title_full The Appearance of The Infraorbital Canal and Infraorbital Ethmoid (Haller’s) Cells on Panoramic Radiography of Edentulous Patients
title_fullStr The Appearance of The Infraorbital Canal and Infraorbital Ethmoid (Haller’s) Cells on Panoramic Radiography of Edentulous Patients
title_full_unstemmed The Appearance of The Infraorbital Canal and Infraorbital Ethmoid (Haller’s) Cells on Panoramic Radiography of Edentulous Patients
title_sort appearance of the infraorbital canal and infraorbital ethmoid (haller’s) cells on panoramic radiography of edentulous patients
publisher Hindawi Limited
series BioMed Research International
issn 2314-6133
2314-6141
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Objectives. The aim of the study is to detect the prevalence and the characteristics of infraorbital canal and Haller’s cells on panoramic radiography of edentulous patients. Methods. The study group comprised 291 panoramic radiographs of edentulous patients. Radiographs were interpreted for the visibility and characteristics of infraorbital canal and Haller’s cells. For classification of infraorbital canal, a method based on the image characteristics of the border of the canal (Types I, II, and III) was used. Haller’s cells were grouped according to the number and the shape of loculations. Results. Infraorbital canal was observed in 246 (84.6%) radiographs. The most prevalent of the observed canals were Type III for both sides (39.9 % for right and 32.3% for left side). The visibility of Haller’s cells was 23.7%. The frequencies of Haller’s cells’ visibility were approximately equal for both genders. There is no significant difference between genders for the visibility of infraorbital canal and Haller’s cells. Conclusions. The surgeons, implantologists, and radiologists should take into consideration infraorbital canal and Haller’s cell for planning implant surgery of maxillary anterior region and undefined orofacial pain for edentulous patients.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/1293124
work_keys_str_mv AT esrayesilova theappearanceoftheinfraorbitalcanalandinfraorbitalethmoidhallerscellsonpanoramicradiographyofedentulouspatients
AT ibrahimsevkibayrakdar theappearanceoftheinfraorbitalcanalandinfraorbitalethmoidhallerscellsonpanoramicradiographyofedentulouspatients
AT esrayesilova appearanceoftheinfraorbitalcanalandinfraorbitalethmoidhallerscellsonpanoramicradiographyofedentulouspatients
AT ibrahimsevkibayrakdar appearanceoftheinfraorbitalcanalandinfraorbitalethmoidhallerscellsonpanoramicradiographyofedentulouspatients
_version_ 1725270188709904384