MINIMIZING FLOORING STRIP WEIGHT: A SHAPE OPTIMIZATION APPROACH

In North America, flooring strips are manufactured with grooves at the back. There are various reasons for these grooves but, historically, they were considered a strategy to reduce weight and transportation costs as well as improving dimensional stability. As no data are available to assess best pr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jean Deteix, George Djoumna, Pierre Blanchet, André Fortin, Alain Cloutier
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: North Carolina State University 2012-02-01
Series:BioResources
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ojs.cnr.ncsu.edu/index.php/BioRes/article/view/BioRes_07_2_1931_Deteix_DBFC_Minimiz_Flooring_Strip_Weight_Shape_Optimization/1489
id doaj-3f35d6ca94fa460db387027362f2971f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3f35d6ca94fa460db387027362f2971f2020-11-24T21:01:24ZengNorth Carolina State UniversityBioResources1930-21262012-02-017219311947MINIMIZING FLOORING STRIP WEIGHT: A SHAPE OPTIMIZATION APPROACHJean Deteix,George Djoumna,Pierre Blanchet,André Fortin,Alain CloutierIn North America, flooring strips are manufactured with grooves at the back. There are various reasons for these grooves but, historically, they were considered a strategy to reduce weight and transportation costs as well as improving dimensional stability. As no data are available to assess best practices in terms of performance, we have investigated methods to reduce flooring strip weight. One way to achieve this is to adjust the number and shape of grooves. Using warp as a comparison tool, we were able to analyze the merits of a finite number of designs. With this approach, however, we could not guarantee that the result was the most favourable. The search for a solution led to design optimization, i.e.: minimizing weight by acting upon a part of the strip’s shape, taking into account its warp resistance or stiffness. This paper describes an optimization strategy adapted to the calculation of the optimal design subjected to arbitrary mechanical and geometrical conditions (including the thickness of the wear layer). This approach is not limited to flooring strips, and it can be used in any situation where a linear hygromechanical model is relevant. This strategy involves two steps: global optimization with respect to admissible variations of the shape (or design) followed by a post-processing phase that takes into account various other mechanical and possibly geometrical conditions imposed on the strip. This paper describes an optimization strategy adapted to the calculation of the optimal design subjected to arbitrary mechanical and geometrical conditions (including the thickness of the wear layer). This approach is not limited to flooring strips, and it can be used in any situation where a linear hygromechanical model is relevant. This strategy involves two steps: global optimization with respect to admissible variations of the shape (or design) followed by a post-processing phase that takes into account various other mechanical and possibly geometrical conditions imposed on the strip.http://ojs.cnr.ncsu.edu/index.php/BioRes/article/view/BioRes_07_2_1931_Deteix_DBFC_Minimiz_Flooring_Strip_Weight_Shape_Optimization/1489Wood flooringDesign optimizationFinite element methodWeightstiffnessMoisture contentLinear elasticity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jean Deteix,
George Djoumna,
Pierre Blanchet,
André Fortin,
Alain Cloutier
spellingShingle Jean Deteix,
George Djoumna,
Pierre Blanchet,
André Fortin,
Alain Cloutier
MINIMIZING FLOORING STRIP WEIGHT: A SHAPE OPTIMIZATION APPROACH
BioResources
Wood flooring
Design optimization
Finite element method
Weight
stiffness
Moisture content
Linear elasticity
author_facet Jean Deteix,
George Djoumna,
Pierre Blanchet,
André Fortin,
Alain Cloutier
author_sort Jean Deteix,
title MINIMIZING FLOORING STRIP WEIGHT: A SHAPE OPTIMIZATION APPROACH
title_short MINIMIZING FLOORING STRIP WEIGHT: A SHAPE OPTIMIZATION APPROACH
title_full MINIMIZING FLOORING STRIP WEIGHT: A SHAPE OPTIMIZATION APPROACH
title_fullStr MINIMIZING FLOORING STRIP WEIGHT: A SHAPE OPTIMIZATION APPROACH
title_full_unstemmed MINIMIZING FLOORING STRIP WEIGHT: A SHAPE OPTIMIZATION APPROACH
title_sort minimizing flooring strip weight: a shape optimization approach
publisher North Carolina State University
series BioResources
issn 1930-2126
publishDate 2012-02-01
description In North America, flooring strips are manufactured with grooves at the back. There are various reasons for these grooves but, historically, they were considered a strategy to reduce weight and transportation costs as well as improving dimensional stability. As no data are available to assess best practices in terms of performance, we have investigated methods to reduce flooring strip weight. One way to achieve this is to adjust the number and shape of grooves. Using warp as a comparison tool, we were able to analyze the merits of a finite number of designs. With this approach, however, we could not guarantee that the result was the most favourable. The search for a solution led to design optimization, i.e.: minimizing weight by acting upon a part of the strip’s shape, taking into account its warp resistance or stiffness. This paper describes an optimization strategy adapted to the calculation of the optimal design subjected to arbitrary mechanical and geometrical conditions (including the thickness of the wear layer). This approach is not limited to flooring strips, and it can be used in any situation where a linear hygromechanical model is relevant. This strategy involves two steps: global optimization with respect to admissible variations of the shape (or design) followed by a post-processing phase that takes into account various other mechanical and possibly geometrical conditions imposed on the strip. This paper describes an optimization strategy adapted to the calculation of the optimal design subjected to arbitrary mechanical and geometrical conditions (including the thickness of the wear layer). This approach is not limited to flooring strips, and it can be used in any situation where a linear hygromechanical model is relevant. This strategy involves two steps: global optimization with respect to admissible variations of the shape (or design) followed by a post-processing phase that takes into account various other mechanical and possibly geometrical conditions imposed on the strip.
topic Wood flooring
Design optimization
Finite element method
Weight
stiffness
Moisture content
Linear elasticity
url http://ojs.cnr.ncsu.edu/index.php/BioRes/article/view/BioRes_07_2_1931_Deteix_DBFC_Minimiz_Flooring_Strip_Weight_Shape_Optimization/1489
work_keys_str_mv AT jeandeteix minimizingflooringstripweightashapeoptimizationapproach
AT georgedjoumna minimizingflooringstripweightashapeoptimizationapproach
AT pierreblanchet minimizingflooringstripweightashapeoptimizationapproach
AT andrefortin minimizingflooringstripweightashapeoptimizationapproach
AT alaincloutier minimizingflooringstripweightashapeoptimizationapproach
_version_ 1716778111274582016