Anthropocene in Friction. Dis-Encounters Between Geology and History

This article brings attention to the need to introduce social sciences to the Global Environmental Change conversation in order to discuss the notion of the “Anthropocene” postulated by prominent natural scientists (Crutzen & Stoermer 2000; Crutzen 2002). The focus of analysis concentrates on an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: German Alfonso Palacio Castañeda, Alberto Vargas, Elizabeth Hennessy
Format: Article
Language:Portuguese
Published: Centro Universitário de Anápolis 2019-02-01
Series:Fronteiras: Journal of Social, Technological and Environmental Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://periodicos.unievangelica.edu.br/index.php/fronteiras/article/view/3425
id doaj-3f20afe06632466090f9cac1d3d8349f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3f20afe06632466090f9cac1d3d8349f2020-11-25T00:00:28ZporCentro Universitário de AnápolisFronteiras: Journal of Social, Technological and Environmental Science2238-88692019-02-018115116810.21664/2238-8869.2019v8i1.p151-1683425Anthropocene in Friction. Dis-Encounters Between Geology and HistoryGerman Alfonso Palacio CastañedaAlberto VargasElizabeth HennessyThis article brings attention to the need to introduce social sciences to the Global Environmental Change conversation in order to discuss the notion of the “Anthropocene” postulated by prominent natural scientists (Crutzen & Stoermer 2000; Crutzen 2002). The focus of analysis concentrates on and the way the local and the global are put into friction (Tsing 2005). If natural scientists have achieved to show the dangers Earth currently confronts, what is not yet clear is if they understand how human societies, the main driver of this geological era, work. They tend to consider humans as a specie, so they make a reductionist idea of humans as a compact unity, taking away our knowledge that teaches that they are “social” (Moore 2015). This article starts with a discussion about the apparent common understanding on the “global,” by natural and social sciences. This article poses important challenges to social scientists, is critical toward the Anthropocene concept, and aspires to suggest critical thinking contributions on the global and its friction with the local. This article illustrates how, through the idea of the Anthropocene, Geology meets History in ways that are not easy to accept for social scientists because, they are right when they argue that the “anthropos” of the Anthropocene cannot be reduced to a “specie” because he/she is a socio-ecological entity.http://periodicos.unievangelica.edu.br/index.php/fronteiras/article/view/3425AnthropoceneGlobalizationGlobal Environmental ChangeWorldEarthEnvironmental History
collection DOAJ
language Portuguese
format Article
sources DOAJ
author German Alfonso Palacio Castañeda
Alberto Vargas
Elizabeth Hennessy
spellingShingle German Alfonso Palacio Castañeda
Alberto Vargas
Elizabeth Hennessy
Anthropocene in Friction. Dis-Encounters Between Geology and History
Fronteiras: Journal of Social, Technological and Environmental Science
Anthropocene
Globalization
Global Environmental Change
World
Earth
Environmental History
author_facet German Alfonso Palacio Castañeda
Alberto Vargas
Elizabeth Hennessy
author_sort German Alfonso Palacio Castañeda
title Anthropocene in Friction. Dis-Encounters Between Geology and History
title_short Anthropocene in Friction. Dis-Encounters Between Geology and History
title_full Anthropocene in Friction. Dis-Encounters Between Geology and History
title_fullStr Anthropocene in Friction. Dis-Encounters Between Geology and History
title_full_unstemmed Anthropocene in Friction. Dis-Encounters Between Geology and History
title_sort anthropocene in friction. dis-encounters between geology and history
publisher Centro Universitário de Anápolis
series Fronteiras: Journal of Social, Technological and Environmental Science
issn 2238-8869
publishDate 2019-02-01
description This article brings attention to the need to introduce social sciences to the Global Environmental Change conversation in order to discuss the notion of the “Anthropocene” postulated by prominent natural scientists (Crutzen & Stoermer 2000; Crutzen 2002). The focus of analysis concentrates on and the way the local and the global are put into friction (Tsing 2005). If natural scientists have achieved to show the dangers Earth currently confronts, what is not yet clear is if they understand how human societies, the main driver of this geological era, work. They tend to consider humans as a specie, so they make a reductionist idea of humans as a compact unity, taking away our knowledge that teaches that they are “social” (Moore 2015). This article starts with a discussion about the apparent common understanding on the “global,” by natural and social sciences. This article poses important challenges to social scientists, is critical toward the Anthropocene concept, and aspires to suggest critical thinking contributions on the global and its friction with the local. This article illustrates how, through the idea of the Anthropocene, Geology meets History in ways that are not easy to accept for social scientists because, they are right when they argue that the “anthropos” of the Anthropocene cannot be reduced to a “specie” because he/she is a socio-ecological entity.
topic Anthropocene
Globalization
Global Environmental Change
World
Earth
Environmental History
url http://periodicos.unievangelica.edu.br/index.php/fronteiras/article/view/3425
work_keys_str_mv AT germanalfonsopalaciocastaneda anthropoceneinfrictiondisencountersbetweengeologyandhistory
AT albertovargas anthropoceneinfrictiondisencountersbetweengeologyandhistory
AT elizabethhennessy anthropoceneinfrictiondisencountersbetweengeologyandhistory
_version_ 1725444939744018432