THE INTERPRETATION OF THE AMENDED RAF ACT 56 OF 1996 AND THE REGULATIONS THERETO BY THE COURTS WITH REGARD TO “SERIOUS INJURY” CLAIMS
The RAF Amendment Act 19 of 2005 came into effect on 1 August 2008 and sections 17(1) and 17(1A) introduced the concept of “serious injury”. This entails that a third-party claimant who wishes to claim compensation for non-patrimonial loss suffered after a motor-vehicle accident has to prove that hi...
Main Authors: | Loma Steynberg, Raheel Ahmed |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Afrikaans |
Published: |
North-West University
2012-08-01
|
Series: | Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.nwu.ac.za/af/webfm_send/58124 |
Similar Items
-
THE ROAD ACCIDENT FUND AND SERIOUS INJURIES: THE NARRATIVE TEST
by: Magda Slabbert, et al.
Published: (2012-08-01) -
Raf V Sweatman (162/2014) [2015] ZASCA 22 (20 March 2015) A Simple Illustration of the SCA'S Statutory Misinterpretation of Section 17(4)(C) of the Road Accident Fund Act 56 of 1998
by: Sarah Fick, et al.
Published: (2015-12-01) -
Risk factors associated with serious and fatal road traffic accidents in Manzini City, Swaziland
by: Demissie, Motuma
Published: (2017) -
Costs related to serious road injuries: a European perspective
by: Annelies Schoeters, et al.
Published: (2020-10-01) -
Protection Measures of Water Resources in the Serious Accident of Inland Nuclear Power Plant
by: ZHOU Yousheng, et al.
Published: (2019-03-01)