Facies recognition using wavelet based fractal analysis and waveform classifier at the Oritupano-A Field, Venezuela

We have used a Wavelet Based Fractal Analysis (WBFA) and a Waveform Classifier (WC) to recognize lithofacies at the Oritupano A field (Oritupano-Leona Block, Venezuela). The WBFA was applied first to Sonic, Density, Gamma Ray and Porosity well logs in the area. The logs that give the best response t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M. López, M. Aldana
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2007-07-01
Series:Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics
Online Access:http://www.nonlin-processes-geophys.net/14/325/2007/npg-14-325-2007.pdf
id doaj-3f0e15735e274d568d8246f36f4c5f4c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3f0e15735e274d568d8246f36f4c5f4c2020-11-24T23:22:32ZengCopernicus PublicationsNonlinear Processes in Geophysics1023-58091607-79462007-07-01144325335Facies recognition using wavelet based fractal analysis and waveform classifier at the Oritupano-A Field, VenezuelaM. LópezM. AldanaWe have used a Wavelet Based Fractal Analysis (WBFA) and a Waveform Classifier (WC) to recognize lithofacies at the Oritupano A field (Oritupano-Leona Block, Venezuela). The WBFA was applied first to Sonic, Density, Gamma Ray and Porosity well logs in the area. The logs that give the best response to the WBFA are the Gamma Ray and NPHI (porosity) logs. In the case of the logs, the lithological content could be associated to the fractal parameters: slope, intercept and fractal dimension. The map obtained using the fractal dimension shows tendencies that generally agree with the depositional patterns previously observed in conventional geological maps. According to the results obtained in this study, zones with fractal dimension values lower than 0.9 correspond to sandstone channels. Values between 0.9 and 1.2 coincide with the interdistributary deltaic shelf and values greater than 1.2 might be associated with zones of greater shale content. The WBFA and WC results obtained for the seismic data show no relation with the lithofacies. The lost of low and high frequencies in these seismic data, as well as phase problems, could be the reasons for this behavior. http://www.nonlin-processes-geophys.net/14/325/2007/npg-14-325-2007.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author M. López
M. Aldana
spellingShingle M. López
M. Aldana
Facies recognition using wavelet based fractal analysis and waveform classifier at the Oritupano-A Field, Venezuela
Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics
author_facet M. López
M. Aldana
author_sort M. López
title Facies recognition using wavelet based fractal analysis and waveform classifier at the Oritupano-A Field, Venezuela
title_short Facies recognition using wavelet based fractal analysis and waveform classifier at the Oritupano-A Field, Venezuela
title_full Facies recognition using wavelet based fractal analysis and waveform classifier at the Oritupano-A Field, Venezuela
title_fullStr Facies recognition using wavelet based fractal analysis and waveform classifier at the Oritupano-A Field, Venezuela
title_full_unstemmed Facies recognition using wavelet based fractal analysis and waveform classifier at the Oritupano-A Field, Venezuela
title_sort facies recognition using wavelet based fractal analysis and waveform classifier at the oritupano-a field, venezuela
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics
issn 1023-5809
1607-7946
publishDate 2007-07-01
description We have used a Wavelet Based Fractal Analysis (WBFA) and a Waveform Classifier (WC) to recognize lithofacies at the Oritupano A field (Oritupano-Leona Block, Venezuela). The WBFA was applied first to Sonic, Density, Gamma Ray and Porosity well logs in the area. The logs that give the best response to the WBFA are the Gamma Ray and NPHI (porosity) logs. In the case of the logs, the lithological content could be associated to the fractal parameters: slope, intercept and fractal dimension. The map obtained using the fractal dimension shows tendencies that generally agree with the depositional patterns previously observed in conventional geological maps. According to the results obtained in this study, zones with fractal dimension values lower than 0.9 correspond to sandstone channels. Values between 0.9 and 1.2 coincide with the interdistributary deltaic shelf and values greater than 1.2 might be associated with zones of greater shale content. The WBFA and WC results obtained for the seismic data show no relation with the lithofacies. The lost of low and high frequencies in these seismic data, as well as phase problems, could be the reasons for this behavior.
url http://www.nonlin-processes-geophys.net/14/325/2007/npg-14-325-2007.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mlopez faciesrecognitionusingwaveletbasedfractalanalysisandwaveformclassifierattheoritupanoafieldvenezuela
AT maldana faciesrecognitionusingwaveletbasedfractalanalysisandwaveformclassifierattheoritupanoafieldvenezuela
_version_ 1725567556052320256