Learning person-centred consultation skills in clinical medicine: A randomised controlled case study

Background: Training institutions need to ensure that healthcare students learn the skills to conduct person-centred consultations. We studied changes in person-centred practice over time following a quality improvement (QI) intervention among Bachelor of Clinical Medical Practice undergraduate stud...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jakobus M. Louw, Johannes F.M. Hugo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AOSIS 2020-07-01
Series:South African Family Practice
Subjects:
Online Access:https://safpj.co.za/index.php/safpj/article/view/5109
id doaj-3ed12ab280c64403864011d8b9e02ff8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3ed12ab280c64403864011d8b9e02ff82020-11-25T03:43:32ZengAOSISSouth African Family Practice2078-61902078-62042020-07-01621e1e910.4102/safp.v62i1.51094053Learning person-centred consultation skills in clinical medicine: A randomised controlled case studyJakobus M. Louw0Johannes F.M. Hugo1Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, PretoriaDepartment of Family Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, PretoriaBackground: Training institutions need to ensure that healthcare students learn the skills to conduct person-centred consultations. We studied changes in person-centred practice over time following a quality improvement (QI) intervention among Bachelor of Clinical Medical Practice undergraduate students. Methods: Students were randomised to intervention and control groups. The intervention group received training and did a QI cycle on their own consultation skills. Consultations with simulated patients were recorded during structured clinical examinations in June (baseline) and November (post-intervention) 2015. Results: Matched consultations for 64 students were analysed. The total SEGUE (Set the stage, Elicit information, Give information, Understand the patient’s perspective and End the encounter scores) were significantly higher in the final assessment compared to baseline for both the whole group and the intervention group (p = 0.005 and 0.015, respectively). The improvement did not differ significantly between intervention and control groups (p = 0.778). Third-year students improved significantly more than second years (p = 0.007). Conclusion: The person-centred practice (including collaboration) of clinical associate students did improve over the period studied. The results show that students’ learning of person-centred practice also happened in ways other than through the QI intervention. There is a need to develop students’ collaborative skills during the medical consultation.https://safpj.co.za/index.php/safpj/article/view/5109person-centred practicecollaborationfacilitationconsultation skillquality improvementclinical associate education
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jakobus M. Louw
Johannes F.M. Hugo
spellingShingle Jakobus M. Louw
Johannes F.M. Hugo
Learning person-centred consultation skills in clinical medicine: A randomised controlled case study
South African Family Practice
person-centred practice
collaboration
facilitation
consultation skill
quality improvement
clinical associate education
author_facet Jakobus M. Louw
Johannes F.M. Hugo
author_sort Jakobus M. Louw
title Learning person-centred consultation skills in clinical medicine: A randomised controlled case study
title_short Learning person-centred consultation skills in clinical medicine: A randomised controlled case study
title_full Learning person-centred consultation skills in clinical medicine: A randomised controlled case study
title_fullStr Learning person-centred consultation skills in clinical medicine: A randomised controlled case study
title_full_unstemmed Learning person-centred consultation skills in clinical medicine: A randomised controlled case study
title_sort learning person-centred consultation skills in clinical medicine: a randomised controlled case study
publisher AOSIS
series South African Family Practice
issn 2078-6190
2078-6204
publishDate 2020-07-01
description Background: Training institutions need to ensure that healthcare students learn the skills to conduct person-centred consultations. We studied changes in person-centred practice over time following a quality improvement (QI) intervention among Bachelor of Clinical Medical Practice undergraduate students. Methods: Students were randomised to intervention and control groups. The intervention group received training and did a QI cycle on their own consultation skills. Consultations with simulated patients were recorded during structured clinical examinations in June (baseline) and November (post-intervention) 2015. Results: Matched consultations for 64 students were analysed. The total SEGUE (Set the stage, Elicit information, Give information, Understand the patient’s perspective and End the encounter scores) were significantly higher in the final assessment compared to baseline for both the whole group and the intervention group (p = 0.005 and 0.015, respectively). The improvement did not differ significantly between intervention and control groups (p = 0.778). Third-year students improved significantly more than second years (p = 0.007). Conclusion: The person-centred practice (including collaboration) of clinical associate students did improve over the period studied. The results show that students’ learning of person-centred practice also happened in ways other than through the QI intervention. There is a need to develop students’ collaborative skills during the medical consultation.
topic person-centred practice
collaboration
facilitation
consultation skill
quality improvement
clinical associate education
url https://safpj.co.za/index.php/safpj/article/view/5109
work_keys_str_mv AT jakobusmlouw learningpersoncentredconsultationskillsinclinicalmedicinearandomisedcontrolledcasestudy
AT johannesfmhugo learningpersoncentredconsultationskillsinclinicalmedicinearandomisedcontrolledcasestudy
_version_ 1724519173211553792