A Philosophical Treatise of Universal Induction
Understanding inductive reasoning is a problem that has engaged mankind for thousands of years. This problem is relevant to a wide range of fields and is integral to the philosophy of science. It has been tackled by many great minds ranging from philosophers to scientists to mathematicians, and more...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2011-06-01
|
Series: | Entropy |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/13/6/1076/ |
id |
doaj-3ec1e7dfdb134aec9ea10949981ccdc2 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-3ec1e7dfdb134aec9ea10949981ccdc22020-11-24T22:47:20ZengMDPI AGEntropy1099-43002011-06-011361076113610.3390/e13061076A Philosophical Treatise of Universal InductionSamuel RathmannerMarcus HutterUnderstanding inductive reasoning is a problem that has engaged mankind for thousands of years. This problem is relevant to a wide range of fields and is integral to the philosophy of science. It has been tackled by many great minds ranging from philosophers to scientists to mathematicians, and more recently computer scientists. In this article we argue the case for Solomonoff Induction, a formal inductive framework which combines algorithmic information theory with the Bayesian framework. Although it achieves excellent theoretical results and is based on solid philosophical foundations, the requisite technical knowledge necessary for understanding this framework has caused it to remain largely unknown and unappreciated in the wider scientific community. The main contribution of this article is to convey Solomonoff induction and its related concepts in a generally accessible form with the aim of bridging this current technical gap. In the process we examine the major historical contributions that have led to the formulation of Solomonoff Induction as well as criticisms of Solomonoff and induction in general. In particular we examine how Solomonoff induction addresses many issues that have plagued other inductive systems, such as the black ravens paradox and the confirmation problem, and compare this approach with other recent approaches.http://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/13/6/1076/sequence predictioninductive inferenceBayes ruleSolomonoff priorKolmogorov complexityOccam’s razorphilosophical issuesconfirmation theoryblack raven paradox |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Samuel Rathmanner Marcus Hutter |
spellingShingle |
Samuel Rathmanner Marcus Hutter A Philosophical Treatise of Universal Induction Entropy sequence prediction inductive inference Bayes rule Solomonoff prior Kolmogorov complexity Occam’s razor philosophical issues confirmation theory black raven paradox |
author_facet |
Samuel Rathmanner Marcus Hutter |
author_sort |
Samuel Rathmanner |
title |
A Philosophical Treatise of Universal Induction |
title_short |
A Philosophical Treatise of Universal Induction |
title_full |
A Philosophical Treatise of Universal Induction |
title_fullStr |
A Philosophical Treatise of Universal Induction |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Philosophical Treatise of Universal Induction |
title_sort |
philosophical treatise of universal induction |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Entropy |
issn |
1099-4300 |
publishDate |
2011-06-01 |
description |
Understanding inductive reasoning is a problem that has engaged mankind for thousands of years. This problem is relevant to a wide range of fields and is integral to the philosophy of science. It has been tackled by many great minds ranging from philosophers to scientists to mathematicians, and more recently computer scientists. In this article we argue the case for Solomonoff Induction, a formal inductive framework which combines algorithmic information theory with the Bayesian framework. Although it achieves excellent theoretical results and is based on solid philosophical foundations, the requisite technical knowledge necessary for understanding this framework has caused it to remain largely unknown and unappreciated in the wider scientific community. The main contribution of this article is to convey Solomonoff induction and its related concepts in a generally accessible form with the aim of bridging this current technical gap. In the process we examine the major historical contributions that have led to the formulation of Solomonoff Induction as well as criticisms of Solomonoff and induction in general. In particular we examine how Solomonoff induction addresses many issues that have plagued other inductive systems, such as the black ravens paradox and the confirmation problem, and compare this approach with other recent approaches. |
topic |
sequence prediction inductive inference Bayes rule Solomonoff prior Kolmogorov complexity Occam’s razor philosophical issues confirmation theory black raven paradox |
url |
http://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/13/6/1076/ |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT samuelrathmanner aphilosophicaltreatiseofuniversalinduction AT marcushutter aphilosophicaltreatiseofuniversalinduction AT samuelrathmanner philosophicaltreatiseofuniversalinduction AT marcushutter philosophicaltreatiseofuniversalinduction |
_version_ |
1725681964773539840 |