Prostate cancer: a review of active surveillance

Lars Lund,1,2 Niels Svolgaard,1 Mads Hvid Poulsen1 1Department of Urology, Odense University Hospital, 2Clinical Institute, Southern University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark Abstract: The objective of this paper is to review the current recommendations for active surveillance in prostate ca...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lund L, Svolgaard N, Poulsen MH
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2014-08-01
Series:Research and Reports in Urology
Online Access:http://www.dovepress.com/prostate-cancer-a-review-of-active-surveillance-peer-reviewed-article-RRU
id doaj-3eadbf90a4524a82a7d5cf60184d1705
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3eadbf90a4524a82a7d5cf60184d17052020-11-24T23:11:28ZengDove Medical PressResearch and Reports in Urology2253-24472014-08-012014default10711217978Prostate cancer: a review of active surveillanceLund LSvolgaard NPoulsen MH Lars Lund,1,2 Niels Svolgaard,1 Mads Hvid Poulsen1 1Department of Urology, Odense University Hospital, 2Clinical Institute, Southern University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark Abstract: The objective of this paper is to review the current recommendations for active surveillance in prostate cancer from the present prospective studies. Worldwide, there are increasing numbers of men with prostate cancer. It is now accepted as standard care that a number of men with favorable-risk disease can be followed with active surveillance. In 1995, the first prospective studies were initiated to assess the feasibility of active surveillance, in which the decision to intervene was determined by prostate-specific antigen and/or histological progression. The strategy was to provide therapy individualized to the biological behavior of the cancer. Clinical trials assessing active surveillance have usually included patients younger than 70 years of age, although the guidelines have changed over time for Gleason score and prostate-specific antigen, eg, doubling time, thereby changing the indication for active treatment. The present review focuses on patient selection, prospective studies reported in the literature, and future directions. Keywords: active surveillance, prostate cancer, prospective studies, reviewhttp://www.dovepress.com/prostate-cancer-a-review-of-active-surveillance-peer-reviewed-article-RRU
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lund L
Svolgaard N
Poulsen MH
spellingShingle Lund L
Svolgaard N
Poulsen MH
Prostate cancer: a review of active surveillance
Research and Reports in Urology
author_facet Lund L
Svolgaard N
Poulsen MH
author_sort Lund L
title Prostate cancer: a review of active surveillance
title_short Prostate cancer: a review of active surveillance
title_full Prostate cancer: a review of active surveillance
title_fullStr Prostate cancer: a review of active surveillance
title_full_unstemmed Prostate cancer: a review of active surveillance
title_sort prostate cancer: a review of active surveillance
publisher Dove Medical Press
series Research and Reports in Urology
issn 2253-2447
publishDate 2014-08-01
description Lars Lund,1,2 Niels Svolgaard,1 Mads Hvid Poulsen1 1Department of Urology, Odense University Hospital, 2Clinical Institute, Southern University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark Abstract: The objective of this paper is to review the current recommendations for active surveillance in prostate cancer from the present prospective studies. Worldwide, there are increasing numbers of men with prostate cancer. It is now accepted as standard care that a number of men with favorable-risk disease can be followed with active surveillance. In 1995, the first prospective studies were initiated to assess the feasibility of active surveillance, in which the decision to intervene was determined by prostate-specific antigen and/or histological progression. The strategy was to provide therapy individualized to the biological behavior of the cancer. Clinical trials assessing active surveillance have usually included patients younger than 70 years of age, although the guidelines have changed over time for Gleason score and prostate-specific antigen, eg, doubling time, thereby changing the indication for active treatment. The present review focuses on patient selection, prospective studies reported in the literature, and future directions. Keywords: active surveillance, prostate cancer, prospective studies, review
url http://www.dovepress.com/prostate-cancer-a-review-of-active-surveillance-peer-reviewed-article-RRU
work_keys_str_mv AT lundl prostatecancerareviewofactivesurveillance
AT svolgaardn prostatecancerareviewofactivesurveillance
AT poulsenmh prostatecancerareviewofactivesurveillance
_version_ 1725604294449692672