Administration or Federation? Constitutional Self-Image and the World Political Order in Which the EU Finds Itself
In this article, I compare constitutional and administrative models in terms of their implications for the EU legal order’s interaction with other legal regimes. I aim to make a twofold argument on the implications of the EU’s constitutional self-image to the world political order. First, as the CJE...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Centre for Studies on Federalism
2017-11-01
|
Series: | Perspectives on Federalism |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/pof.2017.9.issue-2/pof-2017-0015/pof-2017-0015.xml?format=INT |
id |
doaj-3eab4b49723c4982880f7f93ea2e7883 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-3eab4b49723c4982880f7f93ea2e78832021-04-02T13:18:07ZengCentre for Studies on FederalismPerspectives on Federalism2036-54382017-11-0192E-216E-23910.1515/pof-2017-0015pof-2017-0015Administration or Federation? Constitutional Self-Image and the World Political Order in Which the EU Finds ItselfKuo Ming-SungIn this article, I compare constitutional and administrative models in terms of their implications for the EU legal order’s interaction with other legal regimes. I aim to make a twofold argument on the implications of the EU’s constitutional self-image to the world political order. First, as the CJEU adopts an identity-centred strong constitutionalist position on the Union’s external relations, it implicitly frames the EU legal order’s interaction with other legal regimes as in a federated order. Yet the strong political implications of federation are likely to bring about more inter-regime conflicts and provoke reactions from Member States. Second, I provide a critique of the administrative model in the light of GAL’s intervention in inter-regime relations, suggesting a post-identity constitutional alternative in times of crisis. Freed from the value-laden concept of constitutional identity, but without de-constitutionalizing itself, the EU can have the benefits of both the constitutional and administrative models by moving towards a weak-form constitutional order. In the event, the debate, as to whether to conduct the EU’s external relations according to the constitutional or the administrative model, is misconceived.http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/pof.2017.9.issue-2/pof-2017-0015/pof-2017-0015.xml?format=INTEU external relationsconstitutional self-imageweak-form constitutional orderGAL approachpost-identity constitutional vision |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Kuo Ming-Sung |
spellingShingle |
Kuo Ming-Sung Administration or Federation? Constitutional Self-Image and the World Political Order in Which the EU Finds Itself Perspectives on Federalism EU external relations constitutional self-image weak-form constitutional order GAL approach post-identity constitutional vision |
author_facet |
Kuo Ming-Sung |
author_sort |
Kuo Ming-Sung |
title |
Administration or Federation? Constitutional Self-Image and the World Political Order in Which the EU Finds Itself |
title_short |
Administration or Federation? Constitutional Self-Image and the World Political Order in Which the EU Finds Itself |
title_full |
Administration or Federation? Constitutional Self-Image and the World Political Order in Which the EU Finds Itself |
title_fullStr |
Administration or Federation? Constitutional Self-Image and the World Political Order in Which the EU Finds Itself |
title_full_unstemmed |
Administration or Federation? Constitutional Self-Image and the World Political Order in Which the EU Finds Itself |
title_sort |
administration or federation? constitutional self-image and the world political order in which the eu finds itself |
publisher |
Centre for Studies on Federalism |
series |
Perspectives on Federalism |
issn |
2036-5438 |
publishDate |
2017-11-01 |
description |
In this article, I compare constitutional and administrative models in terms of their implications for the EU legal order’s interaction with other legal regimes. I aim to make a twofold argument on the implications of the EU’s constitutional self-image to the world political order. First, as the CJEU adopts an identity-centred strong constitutionalist position on the Union’s external relations, it implicitly frames the EU legal order’s interaction with other legal regimes as in a federated order. Yet the strong political implications of federation are likely to bring about more inter-regime conflicts and provoke reactions from Member States. Second, I provide a critique of the administrative model in the light of GAL’s intervention in inter-regime relations, suggesting a post-identity constitutional alternative in times of crisis. Freed from the value-laden concept of constitutional identity, but without de-constitutionalizing itself, the EU can have the benefits of both the constitutional and administrative models by moving towards a weak-form constitutional order. In the event, the debate, as to whether to conduct the EU’s external relations according to the constitutional or the administrative model, is misconceived. |
topic |
EU external relations constitutional self-image weak-form constitutional order GAL approach post-identity constitutional vision |
url |
http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/pof.2017.9.issue-2/pof-2017-0015/pof-2017-0015.xml?format=INT |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT kuomingsung administrationorfederationconstitutionalselfimageandtheworldpoliticalorderinwhichtheeufindsitself |
_version_ |
1721565459585695744 |