Mitigating the Impact of Field and Image Registration Errors through Spatial Aggregation

Remotely sensed data are commonly used as predictor variables in spatially explicit models depicting landscape characteristics of interest (response) across broad extents, at relatively fine resolution. To create these models, variables are spatially registered to a known coordinate system and used...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: John Hogland, David L.R. Affleck
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-01-01
Series:Remote Sensing
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/11/3/222
id doaj-3e974b660bcc40c78cfe0d21b1d69f6a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3e974b660bcc40c78cfe0d21b1d69f6a2020-11-24T23:05:14ZengMDPI AGRemote Sensing2072-42922019-01-0111322210.3390/rs11030222rs11030222Mitigating the Impact of Field and Image Registration Errors through Spatial AggregationJohn Hogland0David L.R. Affleck1Rocky Mountain Research Station, U.S. Forest Service, Missoula, MT 59801, USAW.A. Franke College of Forestry and Conservation, University of Montana, Missoula, MT 59812, USARemotely sensed data are commonly used as predictor variables in spatially explicit models depicting landscape characteristics of interest (response) across broad extents, at relatively fine resolution. To create these models, variables are spatially registered to a known coordinate system and used to link responses with predictor variable values. Inherently, this linking process introduces measurement error into the response and predictors, which in the latter case causes attenuation bias. Through simulations, our findings indicate that the spatial correlation of response and predictor variables and their corresponding spatial registration (co-registration) errors can have a substantial impact on the bias and accuracy of linear models. Additionally, in this study we evaluate spatial aggregation as a mechanism to minimize the impact of co-registration errors, assess the impact of subsampling within the extent of sample units, and provide a technique that can be used to both determine the extent of an observational unit needed to minimize the impact of co-registration and quantify the amount of error potentially introduced into predictive models.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/11/3/222attenuationregistrationaggregationspatial correlationco-registration
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author John Hogland
David L.R. Affleck
spellingShingle John Hogland
David L.R. Affleck
Mitigating the Impact of Field and Image Registration Errors through Spatial Aggregation
Remote Sensing
attenuation
registration
aggregation
spatial correlation
co-registration
author_facet John Hogland
David L.R. Affleck
author_sort John Hogland
title Mitigating the Impact of Field and Image Registration Errors through Spatial Aggregation
title_short Mitigating the Impact of Field and Image Registration Errors through Spatial Aggregation
title_full Mitigating the Impact of Field and Image Registration Errors through Spatial Aggregation
title_fullStr Mitigating the Impact of Field and Image Registration Errors through Spatial Aggregation
title_full_unstemmed Mitigating the Impact of Field and Image Registration Errors through Spatial Aggregation
title_sort mitigating the impact of field and image registration errors through spatial aggregation
publisher MDPI AG
series Remote Sensing
issn 2072-4292
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Remotely sensed data are commonly used as predictor variables in spatially explicit models depicting landscape characteristics of interest (response) across broad extents, at relatively fine resolution. To create these models, variables are spatially registered to a known coordinate system and used to link responses with predictor variable values. Inherently, this linking process introduces measurement error into the response and predictors, which in the latter case causes attenuation bias. Through simulations, our findings indicate that the spatial correlation of response and predictor variables and their corresponding spatial registration (co-registration) errors can have a substantial impact on the bias and accuracy of linear models. Additionally, in this study we evaluate spatial aggregation as a mechanism to minimize the impact of co-registration errors, assess the impact of subsampling within the extent of sample units, and provide a technique that can be used to both determine the extent of an observational unit needed to minimize the impact of co-registration and quantify the amount of error potentially introduced into predictive models.
topic attenuation
registration
aggregation
spatial correlation
co-registration
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/11/3/222
work_keys_str_mv AT johnhogland mitigatingtheimpactoffieldandimageregistrationerrorsthroughspatialaggregation
AT davidlraffleck mitigatingtheimpactoffieldandimageregistrationerrorsthroughspatialaggregation
_version_ 1725626789543280640