Mitigating the Impact of Field and Image Registration Errors through Spatial Aggregation
Remotely sensed data are commonly used as predictor variables in spatially explicit models depicting landscape characteristics of interest (response) across broad extents, at relatively fine resolution. To create these models, variables are spatially registered to a known coordinate system and used...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2019-01-01
|
Series: | Remote Sensing |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/11/3/222 |
id |
doaj-3e974b660bcc40c78cfe0d21b1d69f6a |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-3e974b660bcc40c78cfe0d21b1d69f6a2020-11-24T23:05:14ZengMDPI AGRemote Sensing2072-42922019-01-0111322210.3390/rs11030222rs11030222Mitigating the Impact of Field and Image Registration Errors through Spatial AggregationJohn Hogland0David L.R. Affleck1Rocky Mountain Research Station, U.S. Forest Service, Missoula, MT 59801, USAW.A. Franke College of Forestry and Conservation, University of Montana, Missoula, MT 59812, USARemotely sensed data are commonly used as predictor variables in spatially explicit models depicting landscape characteristics of interest (response) across broad extents, at relatively fine resolution. To create these models, variables are spatially registered to a known coordinate system and used to link responses with predictor variable values. Inherently, this linking process introduces measurement error into the response and predictors, which in the latter case causes attenuation bias. Through simulations, our findings indicate that the spatial correlation of response and predictor variables and their corresponding spatial registration (co-registration) errors can have a substantial impact on the bias and accuracy of linear models. Additionally, in this study we evaluate spatial aggregation as a mechanism to minimize the impact of co-registration errors, assess the impact of subsampling within the extent of sample units, and provide a technique that can be used to both determine the extent of an observational unit needed to minimize the impact of co-registration and quantify the amount of error potentially introduced into predictive models.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/11/3/222attenuationregistrationaggregationspatial correlationco-registration |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
John Hogland David L.R. Affleck |
spellingShingle |
John Hogland David L.R. Affleck Mitigating the Impact of Field and Image Registration Errors through Spatial Aggregation Remote Sensing attenuation registration aggregation spatial correlation co-registration |
author_facet |
John Hogland David L.R. Affleck |
author_sort |
John Hogland |
title |
Mitigating the Impact of Field and Image Registration Errors through Spatial Aggregation |
title_short |
Mitigating the Impact of Field and Image Registration Errors through Spatial Aggregation |
title_full |
Mitigating the Impact of Field and Image Registration Errors through Spatial Aggregation |
title_fullStr |
Mitigating the Impact of Field and Image Registration Errors through Spatial Aggregation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Mitigating the Impact of Field and Image Registration Errors through Spatial Aggregation |
title_sort |
mitigating the impact of field and image registration errors through spatial aggregation |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Remote Sensing |
issn |
2072-4292 |
publishDate |
2019-01-01 |
description |
Remotely sensed data are commonly used as predictor variables in spatially explicit models depicting landscape characteristics of interest (response) across broad extents, at relatively fine resolution. To create these models, variables are spatially registered to a known coordinate system and used to link responses with predictor variable values. Inherently, this linking process introduces measurement error into the response and predictors, which in the latter case causes attenuation bias. Through simulations, our findings indicate that the spatial correlation of response and predictor variables and their corresponding spatial registration (co-registration) errors can have a substantial impact on the bias and accuracy of linear models. Additionally, in this study we evaluate spatial aggregation as a mechanism to minimize the impact of co-registration errors, assess the impact of subsampling within the extent of sample units, and provide a technique that can be used to both determine the extent of an observational unit needed to minimize the impact of co-registration and quantify the amount of error potentially introduced into predictive models. |
topic |
attenuation registration aggregation spatial correlation co-registration |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/11/3/222 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT johnhogland mitigatingtheimpactoffieldandimageregistrationerrorsthroughspatialaggregation AT davidlraffleck mitigatingtheimpactoffieldandimageregistrationerrorsthroughspatialaggregation |
_version_ |
1725626789543280640 |