Sexual dimorphism in Aegla marginata (Decapoda: Anomura)
A study on sexual dimorphism in Aegla marginata was conducted using geometric morphometric methods. The carapace of 47 females and 75 males and the left and right cheliped propodus of 29 females and 40 males were analyzed. Eighteen landmarks were established in the carapace and 10 in the cheliped pr...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Sociedade Brasileira de Carcinologia
|
Series: | Nauplius |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-64972012000100008&lng=en&tlng=en |
id |
doaj-3e96ef14811e449f870ba964e55bbe5c |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-3e96ef14811e449f870ba964e55bbe5c2020-11-25T03:14:12ZengSociedade Brasileira de CarcinologiaNauplius0104-64972358-29362017586S0104-64972012000100008Sexual dimorphism in Aegla marginata (Decapoda: Anomura)André Trevisan0Murilo Zanetti Marochi1Marcelo Costa2Sandro Santos3Setuko Masunari4Federal University of ParanáFederal University of ParanáFederal University of ParanáFederal University of Santa MariaFederal University of ParanáA study on sexual dimorphism in Aegla marginata was conducted using geometric morphometric methods. The carapace of 47 females and 75 males and the left and right cheliped propodus of 29 females and 40 males were analyzed. Eighteen landmarks were established in the carapace and 10 in the cheliped propodus. A Generalized Procrustes Analysis based on landmark configurations was used to separate the components of size and shape. A Student t-test was used to determine whether statistically significant sexual dimorphism was shown by the carapace and the cheliped propodus. The variation in the shape of the structures was evaluated with a discriminant analysis. Our results show that there is no sexual dimorphism in the carapace of A. marginata. However, the size of the propodus differed statistically between the sexes. The carapace shape differed between the sexes: the females showed a wider posterior area and a narrower anterior area than the males. The shape of the cheliped propodus also differed between the sexes: overall, the females had a longer and narrower cheliped propodus than the males. The variations in the carapace shape found in this study confirm the results of other studies on aeglid morphology; however, the information presented by this study regarding variation in the shape of the cheliped propodus is new to the literature. The geometric morphometric approach applied in this study provided useful tools for achieving the proposed objectives.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-64972012000100008&lng=en&tlng=enaeglidaecarapacechelipedgeometric morphometricssexual size dimorphismsexual shape dimorphism |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
André Trevisan Murilo Zanetti Marochi Marcelo Costa Sandro Santos Setuko Masunari |
spellingShingle |
André Trevisan Murilo Zanetti Marochi Marcelo Costa Sandro Santos Setuko Masunari Sexual dimorphism in Aegla marginata (Decapoda: Anomura) Nauplius aeglidae carapace cheliped geometric morphometrics sexual size dimorphism sexual shape dimorphism |
author_facet |
André Trevisan Murilo Zanetti Marochi Marcelo Costa Sandro Santos Setuko Masunari |
author_sort |
André Trevisan |
title |
Sexual dimorphism in Aegla marginata (Decapoda: Anomura) |
title_short |
Sexual dimorphism in Aegla marginata (Decapoda: Anomura) |
title_full |
Sexual dimorphism in Aegla marginata (Decapoda: Anomura) |
title_fullStr |
Sexual dimorphism in Aegla marginata (Decapoda: Anomura) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Sexual dimorphism in Aegla marginata (Decapoda: Anomura) |
title_sort |
sexual dimorphism in aegla marginata (decapoda: anomura) |
publisher |
Sociedade Brasileira de Carcinologia |
series |
Nauplius |
issn |
0104-6497 2358-2936 |
description |
A study on sexual dimorphism in Aegla marginata was conducted using geometric morphometric methods. The carapace of 47 females and 75 males and the left and right cheliped propodus of 29 females and 40 males were analyzed. Eighteen landmarks were established in the carapace and 10 in the cheliped propodus. A Generalized Procrustes Analysis based on landmark configurations was used to separate the components of size and shape. A Student t-test was used to determine whether statistically significant sexual dimorphism was shown by the carapace and the cheliped propodus. The variation in the shape of the structures was evaluated with a discriminant analysis. Our results show that there is no sexual dimorphism in the carapace of A. marginata. However, the size of the propodus differed statistically between the sexes. The carapace shape differed between the sexes: the females showed a wider posterior area and a narrower anterior area than the males. The shape of the cheliped propodus also differed between the sexes: overall, the females had a longer and narrower cheliped propodus than the males. The variations in the carapace shape found in this study confirm the results of other studies on aeglid morphology; however, the information presented by this study regarding variation in the shape of the cheliped propodus is new to the literature. The geometric morphometric approach applied in this study provided useful tools for achieving the proposed objectives. |
topic |
aeglidae carapace cheliped geometric morphometrics sexual size dimorphism sexual shape dimorphism |
url |
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-64972012000100008&lng=en&tlng=en |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT andretrevisan sexualdimorphisminaeglamarginatadecapodaanomura AT murilozanettimarochi sexualdimorphisminaeglamarginatadecapodaanomura AT marcelocosta sexualdimorphisminaeglamarginatadecapodaanomura AT sandrosantos sexualdimorphisminaeglamarginatadecapodaanomura AT setukomasunari sexualdimorphisminaeglamarginatadecapodaanomura |
_version_ |
1724643972573298688 |