Sexual dimorphism in Aegla marginata (Decapoda: Anomura)

A study on sexual dimorphism in Aegla marginata was conducted using geometric morphometric methods. The carapace of 47 females and 75 males and the left and right cheliped propodus of 29 females and 40 males were analyzed. Eighteen landmarks were established in the carapace and 10 in the cheliped pr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: André Trevisan, Murilo Zanetti Marochi, Marcelo Costa, Sandro Santos, Setuko Masunari
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Carcinologia
Series:Nauplius
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-64972012000100008&lng=en&tlng=en
id doaj-3e96ef14811e449f870ba964e55bbe5c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3e96ef14811e449f870ba964e55bbe5c2020-11-25T03:14:12ZengSociedade Brasileira de CarcinologiaNauplius0104-64972358-29362017586S0104-64972012000100008Sexual dimorphism in Aegla marginata (Decapoda: Anomura)André Trevisan0Murilo Zanetti Marochi1Marcelo Costa2Sandro Santos3Setuko Masunari4Federal University of ParanáFederal University of ParanáFederal University of ParanáFederal University of Santa MariaFederal University of ParanáA study on sexual dimorphism in Aegla marginata was conducted using geometric morphometric methods. The carapace of 47 females and 75 males and the left and right cheliped propodus of 29 females and 40 males were analyzed. Eighteen landmarks were established in the carapace and 10 in the cheliped propodus. A Generalized Procrustes Analysis based on landmark configurations was used to separate the components of size and shape. A Student t-test was used to determine whether statistically significant sexual dimorphism was shown by the carapace and the cheliped propodus. The variation in the shape of the structures was evaluated with a discriminant analysis. Our results show that there is no sexual dimorphism in the carapace of A. marginata. However, the size of the propodus differed statistically between the sexes. The carapace shape differed between the sexes: the females showed a wider posterior area and a narrower anterior area than the males. The shape of the cheliped propodus also differed between the sexes: overall, the females had a longer and narrower cheliped propodus than the males. The variations in the carapace shape found in this study confirm the results of other studies on aeglid morphology; however, the information presented by this study regarding variation in the shape of the cheliped propodus is new to the literature. The geometric morphometric approach applied in this study provided useful tools for achieving the proposed objectives.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-64972012000100008&lng=en&tlng=enaeglidaecarapacechelipedgeometric morphometricssexual size dimorphismsexual shape dimorphism
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author André Trevisan
Murilo Zanetti Marochi
Marcelo Costa
Sandro Santos
Setuko Masunari
spellingShingle André Trevisan
Murilo Zanetti Marochi
Marcelo Costa
Sandro Santos
Setuko Masunari
Sexual dimorphism in Aegla marginata (Decapoda: Anomura)
Nauplius
aeglidae
carapace
cheliped
geometric morphometrics
sexual size dimorphism
sexual shape dimorphism
author_facet André Trevisan
Murilo Zanetti Marochi
Marcelo Costa
Sandro Santos
Setuko Masunari
author_sort André Trevisan
title Sexual dimorphism in Aegla marginata (Decapoda: Anomura)
title_short Sexual dimorphism in Aegla marginata (Decapoda: Anomura)
title_full Sexual dimorphism in Aegla marginata (Decapoda: Anomura)
title_fullStr Sexual dimorphism in Aegla marginata (Decapoda: Anomura)
title_full_unstemmed Sexual dimorphism in Aegla marginata (Decapoda: Anomura)
title_sort sexual dimorphism in aegla marginata (decapoda: anomura)
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Carcinologia
series Nauplius
issn 0104-6497
2358-2936
description A study on sexual dimorphism in Aegla marginata was conducted using geometric morphometric methods. The carapace of 47 females and 75 males and the left and right cheliped propodus of 29 females and 40 males were analyzed. Eighteen landmarks were established in the carapace and 10 in the cheliped propodus. A Generalized Procrustes Analysis based on landmark configurations was used to separate the components of size and shape. A Student t-test was used to determine whether statistically significant sexual dimorphism was shown by the carapace and the cheliped propodus. The variation in the shape of the structures was evaluated with a discriminant analysis. Our results show that there is no sexual dimorphism in the carapace of A. marginata. However, the size of the propodus differed statistically between the sexes. The carapace shape differed between the sexes: the females showed a wider posterior area and a narrower anterior area than the males. The shape of the cheliped propodus also differed between the sexes: overall, the females had a longer and narrower cheliped propodus than the males. The variations in the carapace shape found in this study confirm the results of other studies on aeglid morphology; however, the information presented by this study regarding variation in the shape of the cheliped propodus is new to the literature. The geometric morphometric approach applied in this study provided useful tools for achieving the proposed objectives.
topic aeglidae
carapace
cheliped
geometric morphometrics
sexual size dimorphism
sexual shape dimorphism
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-64972012000100008&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT andretrevisan sexualdimorphisminaeglamarginatadecapodaanomura
AT murilozanettimarochi sexualdimorphisminaeglamarginatadecapodaanomura
AT marcelocosta sexualdimorphisminaeglamarginatadecapodaanomura
AT sandrosantos sexualdimorphisminaeglamarginatadecapodaanomura
AT setukomasunari sexualdimorphisminaeglamarginatadecapodaanomura
_version_ 1724643972573298688