Explicit criteria for prioritization of cataract surgery

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Consensus techniques have been used previously to create explicit criteria to prioritize cataract extraction; however, the appropriateness of the intervention was not included explicitly in previous studies. We developed a prioritiza...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Escobar Antonio, M Quintana José, Bilbao Amaia
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2006-03-01
Series:BMC Health Services Research
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/6/24
id doaj-3e88ef4390aa41968aa9887501951806
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3e88ef4390aa41968aa98875019518062020-11-24T22:17:22ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632006-03-01612410.1186/1472-6963-6-24Explicit criteria for prioritization of cataract surgeryEscobar AntonioM Quintana JoséBilbao Amaia<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Consensus techniques have been used previously to create explicit criteria to prioritize cataract extraction; however, the appropriateness of the intervention was not included explicitly in previous studies. We developed a prioritization tool for cataract extraction according to the RAND method.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Criteria were developed using a modified Delphi panel judgment process. A panel of 11 ophthalmologists was assembled. Ratings were analyzed regarding the level of agreement among panelists. We studied the effect of all variables on the final panel score using general linear and logistic regression models. Priority scoring systems were developed by means of optimal scaling and general linear models. The explicit criteria developed were summarized by means of regression tree analysis.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Eight variables were considered to create the indications. Of the 310 indications that the panel evaluated, 22.6% were considered high priority, 52.3% intermediate priority, and 25.2% low priority. Agreement was reached for 31.9% of the indications and disagreement for 0.3%. Logistic regression and general linear models showed that the preoperative visual acuity of the cataractous eye, visual function, and anticipated visual acuity postoperatively were the most influential variables. Alternative and simple scoring systems were obtained by optimal scaling and general linear models where the previous variables were also the most important. The decision tree also shows the importance of the previous variables and the appropriateness of the intervention.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Our results showed acceptable validity as an evaluation and management tool for prioritizing cataract extraction. It also provides easy algorithms for use in clinical practice.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/6/24
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Escobar Antonio
M Quintana José
Bilbao Amaia
spellingShingle Escobar Antonio
M Quintana José
Bilbao Amaia
Explicit criteria for prioritization of cataract surgery
BMC Health Services Research
author_facet Escobar Antonio
M Quintana José
Bilbao Amaia
author_sort Escobar Antonio
title Explicit criteria for prioritization of cataract surgery
title_short Explicit criteria for prioritization of cataract surgery
title_full Explicit criteria for prioritization of cataract surgery
title_fullStr Explicit criteria for prioritization of cataract surgery
title_full_unstemmed Explicit criteria for prioritization of cataract surgery
title_sort explicit criteria for prioritization of cataract surgery
publisher BMC
series BMC Health Services Research
issn 1472-6963
publishDate 2006-03-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Consensus techniques have been used previously to create explicit criteria to prioritize cataract extraction; however, the appropriateness of the intervention was not included explicitly in previous studies. We developed a prioritization tool for cataract extraction according to the RAND method.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Criteria were developed using a modified Delphi panel judgment process. A panel of 11 ophthalmologists was assembled. Ratings were analyzed regarding the level of agreement among panelists. We studied the effect of all variables on the final panel score using general linear and logistic regression models. Priority scoring systems were developed by means of optimal scaling and general linear models. The explicit criteria developed were summarized by means of regression tree analysis.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Eight variables were considered to create the indications. Of the 310 indications that the panel evaluated, 22.6% were considered high priority, 52.3% intermediate priority, and 25.2% low priority. Agreement was reached for 31.9% of the indications and disagreement for 0.3%. Logistic regression and general linear models showed that the preoperative visual acuity of the cataractous eye, visual function, and anticipated visual acuity postoperatively were the most influential variables. Alternative and simple scoring systems were obtained by optimal scaling and general linear models where the previous variables were also the most important. The decision tree also shows the importance of the previous variables and the appropriateness of the intervention.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Our results showed acceptable validity as an evaluation and management tool for prioritizing cataract extraction. It also provides easy algorithms for use in clinical practice.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/6/24
work_keys_str_mv AT escobarantonio explicitcriteriaforprioritizationofcataractsurgery
AT mquintanajose explicitcriteriaforprioritizationofcataractsurgery
AT bilbaoamaia explicitcriteriaforprioritizationofcataractsurgery
_version_ 1725785129389916160