A cross-sectional study of direct immunofluorescence in the diagnosis of immunobullous dermatoses

Background: Autoimmune blistering diseases are a group of bullous disorders characterized by pathogenic antibodies directed at the target antigens, which are components of the desmosomes or adhesion complex at the dermoepidermal junction. Direct immunofluorescence (DIF) is invaluable in the diagnosi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Archana C Buch, Harsh Kumar, N K Panicker, Sonali Misal, Y K Sharma, Charusheela R Gore
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2014-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Dermatology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.e-ijd.org/article.asp?issn=0019-5154;year=2014;volume=59;issue=4;spage=364;epage=368;aulast=Buch
id doaj-3e82b94d92d542ad9bc83f81611da1c2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3e82b94d92d542ad9bc83f81611da1c22020-11-24T23:11:28ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Dermatology0019-51541998-36112014-01-0159436436810.4103/0019-5154.135488A cross-sectional study of direct immunofluorescence in the diagnosis of immunobullous dermatosesArchana C BuchHarsh KumarN K PanickerSonali MisalY K SharmaCharusheela R GoreBackground: Autoimmune blistering diseases are a group of bullous disorders characterized by pathogenic antibodies directed at the target antigens, which are components of the desmosomes or adhesion complex at the dermoepidermal junction. Direct immunofluorescence (DIF) is invaluable in the diagnosis of these lesions. Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity of DIF in immunobullous dermatoses and to study the pattern of DIF. The study also aims to correlate DIF with clinical and histologic findings and to analyze discrepancies. Materials and Methods: Total 100 biopsies received over a period of 2 years in the Department of Pathology were analyzed. DIF, histopathology and clinical data were reviewed. Results: Out of 100, 89 cases showed DIF patterns concordant with clinical/histologic diagnosis. The sensitivity of DIF was 94.44% (51/58) in the pemphigus and 84% (21/25) in the bullous pemphigoid (BP) group, 100% each in dermatitis herpetiformis (2/2) and linear IgA disease (1/1). A total of 11 histologically proven cases of immunobullous lesions were DIF negative-four (three of pemphigus vulgaris and one of BP) due to having no epidermis, three (cases of BP) owing to sampling/technical errors and the remaining four (cases of pemphigus vulgaris) due to being on treatment. Conclusion: Immunofluorescence helps confirm the diagnosis of bullous lesions in which there is clinical and the histopathologic overlap. Sampling errors contributed to false negative (FN) results.http://www.e-ijd.org/article.asp?issn=0019-5154;year=2014;volume=59;issue=4;spage=364;epage=368;aulast=BuchAutoimmune bullous disordersdirect immunofluorescencevesiculobullous lesions
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Archana C Buch
Harsh Kumar
N K Panicker
Sonali Misal
Y K Sharma
Charusheela R Gore
spellingShingle Archana C Buch
Harsh Kumar
N K Panicker
Sonali Misal
Y K Sharma
Charusheela R Gore
A cross-sectional study of direct immunofluorescence in the diagnosis of immunobullous dermatoses
Indian Journal of Dermatology
Autoimmune bullous disorders
direct immunofluorescence
vesiculobullous lesions
author_facet Archana C Buch
Harsh Kumar
N K Panicker
Sonali Misal
Y K Sharma
Charusheela R Gore
author_sort Archana C Buch
title A cross-sectional study of direct immunofluorescence in the diagnosis of immunobullous dermatoses
title_short A cross-sectional study of direct immunofluorescence in the diagnosis of immunobullous dermatoses
title_full A cross-sectional study of direct immunofluorescence in the diagnosis of immunobullous dermatoses
title_fullStr A cross-sectional study of direct immunofluorescence in the diagnosis of immunobullous dermatoses
title_full_unstemmed A cross-sectional study of direct immunofluorescence in the diagnosis of immunobullous dermatoses
title_sort cross-sectional study of direct immunofluorescence in the diagnosis of immunobullous dermatoses
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Indian Journal of Dermatology
issn 0019-5154
1998-3611
publishDate 2014-01-01
description Background: Autoimmune blistering diseases are a group of bullous disorders characterized by pathogenic antibodies directed at the target antigens, which are components of the desmosomes or adhesion complex at the dermoepidermal junction. Direct immunofluorescence (DIF) is invaluable in the diagnosis of these lesions. Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity of DIF in immunobullous dermatoses and to study the pattern of DIF. The study also aims to correlate DIF with clinical and histologic findings and to analyze discrepancies. Materials and Methods: Total 100 biopsies received over a period of 2 years in the Department of Pathology were analyzed. DIF, histopathology and clinical data were reviewed. Results: Out of 100, 89 cases showed DIF patterns concordant with clinical/histologic diagnosis. The sensitivity of DIF was 94.44% (51/58) in the pemphigus and 84% (21/25) in the bullous pemphigoid (BP) group, 100% each in dermatitis herpetiformis (2/2) and linear IgA disease (1/1). A total of 11 histologically proven cases of immunobullous lesions were DIF negative-four (three of pemphigus vulgaris and one of BP) due to having no epidermis, three (cases of BP) owing to sampling/technical errors and the remaining four (cases of pemphigus vulgaris) due to being on treatment. Conclusion: Immunofluorescence helps confirm the diagnosis of bullous lesions in which there is clinical and the histopathologic overlap. Sampling errors contributed to false negative (FN) results.
topic Autoimmune bullous disorders
direct immunofluorescence
vesiculobullous lesions
url http://www.e-ijd.org/article.asp?issn=0019-5154;year=2014;volume=59;issue=4;spage=364;epage=368;aulast=Buch
work_keys_str_mv AT archanacbuch acrosssectionalstudyofdirectimmunofluorescenceinthediagnosisofimmunobullousdermatoses
AT harshkumar acrosssectionalstudyofdirectimmunofluorescenceinthediagnosisofimmunobullousdermatoses
AT nkpanicker acrosssectionalstudyofdirectimmunofluorescenceinthediagnosisofimmunobullousdermatoses
AT sonalimisal acrosssectionalstudyofdirectimmunofluorescenceinthediagnosisofimmunobullousdermatoses
AT yksharma acrosssectionalstudyofdirectimmunofluorescenceinthediagnosisofimmunobullousdermatoses
AT charusheelargore acrosssectionalstudyofdirectimmunofluorescenceinthediagnosisofimmunobullousdermatoses
AT archanacbuch crosssectionalstudyofdirectimmunofluorescenceinthediagnosisofimmunobullousdermatoses
AT harshkumar crosssectionalstudyofdirectimmunofluorescenceinthediagnosisofimmunobullousdermatoses
AT nkpanicker crosssectionalstudyofdirectimmunofluorescenceinthediagnosisofimmunobullousdermatoses
AT sonalimisal crosssectionalstudyofdirectimmunofluorescenceinthediagnosisofimmunobullousdermatoses
AT yksharma crosssectionalstudyofdirectimmunofluorescenceinthediagnosisofimmunobullousdermatoses
AT charusheelargore crosssectionalstudyofdirectimmunofluorescenceinthediagnosisofimmunobullousdermatoses
_version_ 1725604285542039552