How to claim what is mine: Negotiating professional roles in inter-organizational projects

Professional roles within inter-organizational projects have become increasingly diverse and contested, yet little is known about how the members of a profession react to the threats of marginalization these collaborative settings entail. Focusing on the architectural profession, in which historica...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marina Bos -de Vos, Bente Lieftink
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Delft University of Technology 2018-12-01
Series:A+BE: Architecture and the Built Environment
Online Access:https://ojs-libaccp.tudelft.nl/index.php/abe/article/view/3556
id doaj-3e7dbeeffce64f039d3648f91b8e8416
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3e7dbeeffce64f039d3648f91b8e84162020-11-25T03:45:58ZengDelft University of TechnologyA+BE: Architecture and the Built Environment2212-32022214-72332018-12-0181310.7480/abe.2018.13.3556How to claim what is mine: Negotiating professional roles in inter-organizational projectsMarina Bos -de Vos0Bente Lieftink1TU Delft, Architecture and the Built EnvironmentTU Delft, Architecture and the Built Environment Professional roles within inter-organizational projects have become increasingly diverse and contested, yet little is known about how the members of a profession react to the threats of marginalization these collaborative settings entail. Focusing on the architectural profession, in which historically established role boundaries have become particularly blurred, we analyse how professionals address the concept of these boundaries in order to negotiate their roles in inter-organizational projects. Drawing on empirical data from interviews with project architects, we identify and detail three types of boundary work: reinstating role boundaries, bending role boundaries, and pioneering role boundaries. These categories exemplify how professionals may frame the threat of marginalization differently depending upon their preconceptions of what constitutes professional work. This study provides important insights into how professionals reclaim, change, or temporarily adapt their practice domains in inter-organizational projects; how their boundary work practices help to (re)shape role structures; and how these practices may trigger different paths of professional evolution. https://ojs-libaccp.tudelft.nl/index.php/abe/article/view/3556
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Marina Bos -de Vos
Bente Lieftink
spellingShingle Marina Bos -de Vos
Bente Lieftink
How to claim what is mine: Negotiating professional roles in inter-organizational projects
A+BE: Architecture and the Built Environment
author_facet Marina Bos -de Vos
Bente Lieftink
author_sort Marina Bos -de Vos
title How to claim what is mine: Negotiating professional roles in inter-organizational projects
title_short How to claim what is mine: Negotiating professional roles in inter-organizational projects
title_full How to claim what is mine: Negotiating professional roles in inter-organizational projects
title_fullStr How to claim what is mine: Negotiating professional roles in inter-organizational projects
title_full_unstemmed How to claim what is mine: Negotiating professional roles in inter-organizational projects
title_sort how to claim what is mine: negotiating professional roles in inter-organizational projects
publisher Delft University of Technology
series A+BE: Architecture and the Built Environment
issn 2212-3202
2214-7233
publishDate 2018-12-01
description Professional roles within inter-organizational projects have become increasingly diverse and contested, yet little is known about how the members of a profession react to the threats of marginalization these collaborative settings entail. Focusing on the architectural profession, in which historically established role boundaries have become particularly blurred, we analyse how professionals address the concept of these boundaries in order to negotiate their roles in inter-organizational projects. Drawing on empirical data from interviews with project architects, we identify and detail three types of boundary work: reinstating role boundaries, bending role boundaries, and pioneering role boundaries. These categories exemplify how professionals may frame the threat of marginalization differently depending upon their preconceptions of what constitutes professional work. This study provides important insights into how professionals reclaim, change, or temporarily adapt their practice domains in inter-organizational projects; how their boundary work practices help to (re)shape role structures; and how these practices may trigger different paths of professional evolution.
url https://ojs-libaccp.tudelft.nl/index.php/abe/article/view/3556
work_keys_str_mv AT marinabosdevos howtoclaimwhatisminenegotiatingprofessionalrolesininterorganizationalprojects
AT bentelieftink howtoclaimwhatisminenegotiatingprofessionalrolesininterorganizationalprojects
_version_ 1724508607475613696