Rapid changes of body weight after a headstand: a metrological analysis.

Despite recent rules from amateur wrestling sport-governing bodies intended to discourage extreme weight loss measures, wrestling culture still includes varied methods to make weight, including holding a headstand position immediately before stepping on the scale. The procedure, according to the not...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alejandro Acuña-Espinoza, Luis Fernando Aragón-Vargas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2015-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4437900?pdf=render
id doaj-3e7cee941ae04e01ae63474b86c435fa
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3e7cee941ae04e01ae63474b86c435fa2020-11-25T00:57:17ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-01105e012476410.1371/journal.pone.0124764Rapid changes of body weight after a headstand: a metrological analysis.Alejandro Acuña-EspinozaLuis Fernando Aragón-VargasDespite recent rules from amateur wrestling sport-governing bodies intended to discourage extreme weight loss measures, wrestling culture still includes varied methods to make weight, including holding a headstand position immediately before stepping on the scale. The procedure, according to the notion, will reduce reported mass anywhere between 250 and 500 g (weight between 2.45 and 4.89 N). The aim of this study was to compare any possible differences between the headstand procedure (HS) and a normal (CON) weight measure, using a metrological approach defined by the European Association of National Metrology Institutes. Seventeen adult men were weighed on a force plate before and after doing a headstand or standing normally for 30s. The order of treatment application was assigned randomly. Post-test weight was significantly larger than pre-test (mean ± s.d.) (640.7 ± 62.8 N and 640.3 ± 62.7 N, respectively, p < 0.0001) under both treatments. No treatment vs. time of test interaction was found. No significant difference was found between CON and HS weight (640.6 ± 62.8 N and 640.9 ± 62.9 N, respectively, p=0.3815). The metrological tests suggest that the statistical differences found are related to the force plate measuring errors in every pre-established time interval. The 45 g (0.44 N) difference found between pretest and post-test lies within the uncertainty range identified for the equipment (± 110 g or 1.08 N). In conclusion, a 30-second headstand has no significant effect on registered body weight. The small variations obtained were due to equipment-associated measuring errors. This experiment offers systematic empirical evidence to aid in the elimination of this unjustified practice among the wrestling community.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4437900?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alejandro Acuña-Espinoza
Luis Fernando Aragón-Vargas
spellingShingle Alejandro Acuña-Espinoza
Luis Fernando Aragón-Vargas
Rapid changes of body weight after a headstand: a metrological analysis.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Alejandro Acuña-Espinoza
Luis Fernando Aragón-Vargas
author_sort Alejandro Acuña-Espinoza
title Rapid changes of body weight after a headstand: a metrological analysis.
title_short Rapid changes of body weight after a headstand: a metrological analysis.
title_full Rapid changes of body weight after a headstand: a metrological analysis.
title_fullStr Rapid changes of body weight after a headstand: a metrological analysis.
title_full_unstemmed Rapid changes of body weight after a headstand: a metrological analysis.
title_sort rapid changes of body weight after a headstand: a metrological analysis.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Despite recent rules from amateur wrestling sport-governing bodies intended to discourage extreme weight loss measures, wrestling culture still includes varied methods to make weight, including holding a headstand position immediately before stepping on the scale. The procedure, according to the notion, will reduce reported mass anywhere between 250 and 500 g (weight between 2.45 and 4.89 N). The aim of this study was to compare any possible differences between the headstand procedure (HS) and a normal (CON) weight measure, using a metrological approach defined by the European Association of National Metrology Institutes. Seventeen adult men were weighed on a force plate before and after doing a headstand or standing normally for 30s. The order of treatment application was assigned randomly. Post-test weight was significantly larger than pre-test (mean ± s.d.) (640.7 ± 62.8 N and 640.3 ± 62.7 N, respectively, p < 0.0001) under both treatments. No treatment vs. time of test interaction was found. No significant difference was found between CON and HS weight (640.6 ± 62.8 N and 640.9 ± 62.9 N, respectively, p=0.3815). The metrological tests suggest that the statistical differences found are related to the force plate measuring errors in every pre-established time interval. The 45 g (0.44 N) difference found between pretest and post-test lies within the uncertainty range identified for the equipment (± 110 g or 1.08 N). In conclusion, a 30-second headstand has no significant effect on registered body weight. The small variations obtained were due to equipment-associated measuring errors. This experiment offers systematic empirical evidence to aid in the elimination of this unjustified practice among the wrestling community.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4437900?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT alejandroacunaespinoza rapidchangesofbodyweightafteraheadstandametrologicalanalysis
AT luisfernandoaragonvargas rapidchangesofbodyweightafteraheadstandametrologicalanalysis
_version_ 1725224882233409536