THE IMPACT OF PROPERTY TAXATION ON BUSINESS INVESTMENT IN ALBERTA
When considering an increase in their non-residential property tax rates, Alberta municipalities must also take into account the adverse effects such an increase will likely have on business investment in their communities. Based on data on commercial and industrial permit values for 17 Alberta c...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Calgary
2021-03-01
|
Series: | The School of Public Policy Publications |
Online Access: | https://www.policyschool.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/UP30_PropertyTaxation_Dahlby-Ferede-Khanal.pdf |
id |
doaj-3e78e8a76824488d91cba3725b61d636 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-3e78e8a76824488d91cba3725b61d6362021-04-26T16:59:12ZengUniversity of CalgaryThe School of Public Policy Publications2560-83122560-83202021-03-01148http://dx.doi.org/10.11575/sppp.v14i.69686THE IMPACT OF PROPERTY TAXATION ON BUSINESS INVESTMENT IN ALBERTABev Dahlby0Ergete Ferede1Mukesh Khanal2School of Public Policy, University of Calgary, CalgaryDepartment of Economics, MacEwan University, EdmontonSchool of Public Policy, University of Calgary, CalgaryWhen considering an increase in their non-residential property tax rates, Alberta municipalities must also take into account the adverse effects such an increase will likely have on business investment in their communities. Based on data on commercial and industrial permit values for 17 Alberta cities from 1998 to 2017, this paper shows that increasing the non-residential property tax rate corresponds to a drop in businesses investment in buildings and structures. Raising the non-residential property tax rate by, for example, 10 per cent results in a seven per cent drop in business investment. Businesses have long expressed concerns about municipal government’s excessive reliance on taxing commercial and industrial property. The issue has become particularly salient in Alberta since the City of Calgary increased its non-residential property tax rate, not only to replace its business tax, but also to offset the decline in the property tax base from the reduction in the assessed value of downtown office buildings. Calgary rationalized that eliminating the business tax and shifting the tax burden to the non-residential property tax would boost the city’s competitiveness and attractiveness, besides contributing to improved administrative efficiency in the tax system. The business tax that the city eliminated was responsible for almost a quarter of non-residential and business tax revenues. However, the city envisioned that eliminating this tax and transferring its onus to the non-residential property tax would generate the same amount of revenue. This study finds that if the non-residential property tax rate is increased by one mill — the tax rate per $1,000 of property value — there is a concordant drop in annual real per capita commercial and industrial building permits by about $39.37. This then creates a boomerang effect – a decline in investment results in a lower stock of capital and a corresponding reduction in property and income tax bases in the future. With higher tax rates eroding tax bases, revenues thus cannot keep pace proportionately. Taxes on residential and non-residential property in Alberta make up about half of the total revenues for the province’s municipalities. Property taxes are vital for financing local public services. While this study shows that spending more on municipal services does not significantly affect business investment, or business decisions on where to locate, increasing non-residential property taxes has a negative impact on such decisions and investments. Policy-makers in other Alberta municipalities observing the effects of the City of Calgary’s recent hike in non-residential property taxes in the midst of an economic downturn should take into account the potential adverse effects on local economic growth and their municipal revenue bases. This study will contribute to informed policy-making in the province’s municipalities.https://www.policyschool.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/UP30_PropertyTaxation_Dahlby-Ferede-Khanal.pdf |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Bev Dahlby Ergete Ferede Mukesh Khanal |
spellingShingle |
Bev Dahlby Ergete Ferede Mukesh Khanal THE IMPACT OF PROPERTY TAXATION ON BUSINESS INVESTMENT IN ALBERTA The School of Public Policy Publications |
author_facet |
Bev Dahlby Ergete Ferede Mukesh Khanal |
author_sort |
Bev Dahlby |
title |
THE IMPACT OF PROPERTY TAXATION ON BUSINESS INVESTMENT IN ALBERTA |
title_short |
THE IMPACT OF PROPERTY TAXATION ON BUSINESS INVESTMENT IN ALBERTA |
title_full |
THE IMPACT OF PROPERTY TAXATION ON BUSINESS INVESTMENT IN ALBERTA |
title_fullStr |
THE IMPACT OF PROPERTY TAXATION ON BUSINESS INVESTMENT IN ALBERTA |
title_full_unstemmed |
THE IMPACT OF PROPERTY TAXATION ON BUSINESS INVESTMENT IN ALBERTA |
title_sort |
impact of property taxation on business investment in alberta |
publisher |
University of Calgary |
series |
The School of Public Policy Publications |
issn |
2560-8312 2560-8320 |
publishDate |
2021-03-01 |
description |
When considering an increase in their non-residential property tax rates,
Alberta municipalities must also take into account the adverse effects such an
increase will likely have on business investment in their communities. Based on
data on commercial and industrial permit values for 17 Alberta cities from 1998
to 2017, this paper shows that increasing the non-residential property tax rate
corresponds to a drop in businesses investment in buildings and structures.
Raising the non-residential property tax rate by, for example, 10 per cent
results in a seven per cent drop in business investment.
Businesses have long expressed concerns about municipal government’s
excessive reliance on taxing commercial and industrial property. The issue
has become particularly salient in Alberta since the City of Calgary increased
its non-residential property tax rate, not only to replace its business tax, but
also to offset the decline in the property tax base from the reduction in the
assessed value of downtown office buildings.
Calgary rationalized that eliminating the business tax and shifting the
tax burden to the non-residential property tax would boost the city’s
competitiveness and attractiveness, besides contributing to improved
administrative efficiency in the tax system. The business tax that the city
eliminated was responsible for almost a quarter of non-residential and
business tax revenues. However, the city envisioned that eliminating this tax and transferring its onus to the non-residential property tax would generate the same
amount of revenue.
This study finds that if the non-residential property tax rate is increased by one mill
— the tax rate per $1,000 of property value — there is a concordant drop in annual
real per capita commercial and industrial building permits by about $39.37. This then
creates a boomerang effect – a decline in investment results in a lower stock of capital
and a corresponding reduction in property and income tax bases in the future. With
higher tax rates eroding tax bases, revenues thus cannot keep pace proportionately.
Taxes on residential and non-residential property in Alberta make up about half of the
total revenues for the province’s municipalities. Property taxes are vital for financing
local public services. While this study shows that spending more on municipal services
does not significantly affect business investment, or business decisions on where
to locate, increasing non-residential property taxes has a negative impact on such
decisions and investments.
Policy-makers in other Alberta municipalities observing the effects of the City of
Calgary’s recent hike in non-residential property taxes in the midst of an economic
downturn should take into account the potential adverse effects on local economic
growth and their municipal revenue bases. This study will contribute to informed
policy-making in the province’s municipalities. |
url |
https://www.policyschool.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/UP30_PropertyTaxation_Dahlby-Ferede-Khanal.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT bevdahlby theimpactofpropertytaxationonbusinessinvestmentinalberta AT ergeteferede theimpactofpropertytaxationonbusinessinvestmentinalberta AT mukeshkhanal theimpactofpropertytaxationonbusinessinvestmentinalberta AT bevdahlby impactofpropertytaxationonbusinessinvestmentinalberta AT ergeteferede impactofpropertytaxationonbusinessinvestmentinalberta AT mukeshkhanal impactofpropertytaxationonbusinessinvestmentinalberta |
_version_ |
1721507451465891840 |