Type of Employment Contract and Subjective well-being

Transformation of the industrial relations in the European countries is often associated with the expansion of various non-standard forms of employment, among which is temporary or fixed-term employment. Fixed-term contracts are associated with erosion of the existing social model, and can affect ob...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Galina A. Monusova
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Russian Academy of Sciences, Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology 2019-09-01
Series:Социологический журнал
Online Access:http://jour.fnisc.ru/upload/journals/1/articles/6675/submission/proof/6675-61-12332-1-10-20191001.pdf
id doaj-3e6d98f931e54ff9bcdbdb90074c3994
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3e6d98f931e54ff9bcdbdb90074c39942020-11-25T02:59:23ZrusRussian Academy of Sciences, Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied SociologyСоциологический журнал1562-24952019-09-01253466610.19181/socjour.2019.25.3.66756675Type of Employment Contract and Subjective well-beingGalina A. Monusova0Russian Academy of SciencesTransformation of the industrial relations in the European countries is often associated with the expansion of various non-standard forms of employment, among which is temporary or fixed-term employment. Fixed-term contracts are associated with erosion of the existing social model, and can affect objective (like earnings and working conditions) as well as subjective (like satisfaction or feelings of stress) workers’ well-being.The focus of this study is the subjective well-being of those who have fixed-term employment contract in comparison with holders of the open-ended contract. Sociological research literature sees often temporary employment as “precarious” and “socially deficient”, and associated with a very low level of social well-being. This study tries to show that the relationship between the type of employment contract and subjective well-being is not simple and causal, and reflects the impact of confounding factors like the quality of human capital and the composition of jobs filled with temporary workers. This conclusion has important implications for economic and social policy.The empirical analysis exploits data from the European Social Survey (ESS, 2012– 2016) and looks at such dimensions as life and job satisfaction, social status assessment, psychological depression and anxiety, expectations of losing work and income over the next 12 months. The results indicate ambiguity of the effect of temporary employment on the subjective assessments. Different indicators respond differently to the type of contract. Workers with similar human capital and occupying comparable jobs tend to show comparable levels of present subjective well-being regardless of the contract type they possess. However, fixed-term contracts are more likely to generate depression, anxiety and uncertainty about future prospects.http://jour.fnisc.ru/upload/journals/1/articles/6675/submission/proof/6675-61-12332-1-10-20191001.pdf
collection DOAJ
language Russian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Galina A. Monusova
spellingShingle Galina A. Monusova
Type of Employment Contract and Subjective well-being
Социологический журнал
author_facet Galina A. Monusova
author_sort Galina A. Monusova
title Type of Employment Contract and Subjective well-being
title_short Type of Employment Contract and Subjective well-being
title_full Type of Employment Contract and Subjective well-being
title_fullStr Type of Employment Contract and Subjective well-being
title_full_unstemmed Type of Employment Contract and Subjective well-being
title_sort type of employment contract and subjective well-being
publisher Russian Academy of Sciences, Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology
series Социологический журнал
issn 1562-2495
publishDate 2019-09-01
description Transformation of the industrial relations in the European countries is often associated with the expansion of various non-standard forms of employment, among which is temporary or fixed-term employment. Fixed-term contracts are associated with erosion of the existing social model, and can affect objective (like earnings and working conditions) as well as subjective (like satisfaction or feelings of stress) workers’ well-being.The focus of this study is the subjective well-being of those who have fixed-term employment contract in comparison with holders of the open-ended contract. Sociological research literature sees often temporary employment as “precarious” and “socially deficient”, and associated with a very low level of social well-being. This study tries to show that the relationship between the type of employment contract and subjective well-being is not simple and causal, and reflects the impact of confounding factors like the quality of human capital and the composition of jobs filled with temporary workers. This conclusion has important implications for economic and social policy.The empirical analysis exploits data from the European Social Survey (ESS, 2012– 2016) and looks at such dimensions as life and job satisfaction, social status assessment, psychological depression and anxiety, expectations of losing work and income over the next 12 months. The results indicate ambiguity of the effect of temporary employment on the subjective assessments. Different indicators respond differently to the type of contract. Workers with similar human capital and occupying comparable jobs tend to show comparable levels of present subjective well-being regardless of the contract type they possess. However, fixed-term contracts are more likely to generate depression, anxiety and uncertainty about future prospects.
url http://jour.fnisc.ru/upload/journals/1/articles/6675/submission/proof/6675-61-12332-1-10-20191001.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT galinaamonusova typeofemploymentcontractandsubjectivewellbeing
_version_ 1724702780565749760