Doubtful records of reptile species in some areas of the Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve (Romania)

In the present paper there are provided details on the doubtful data on the occurrence of some reptile species in various parts of the Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve. Testudo graeca was indicated by mistake at Sfântu Gheorghe (probably the authors saw the species in some places from the continental...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: TÖRÖK Zsolt Csaba
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: CITDD Publishing House 2012-09-01
Series:Scientific Annals of the Danube Delta Institute
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ddni.ro/manager/editor/UserFiles/File/Scientific%20annals/volume/18/13.pdf
id doaj-3e6ab17ed65d4389ae3d95de744a7451
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3e6ab17ed65d4389ae3d95de744a74512020-11-24T21:35:44ZengCITDD Publishing HouseScientific Annals of the Danube Delta Institute1842-614X2247-99022012-09-011822323210.7427/DDI.18.13Doubtful records of reptile species in some areas of the Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve (Romania)TÖRÖK Zsolt CsabaIn the present paper there are provided details on the doubtful data on the occurrence of some reptile species in various parts of the Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve. Testudo graeca was indicated by mistake at Sfântu Gheorghe (probably the authors saw the species in some places from the continental plateau nearby of Sfântu Gheorghe branch, not inside the Danube Delta). Lacerta viridis was mentioned in the so-called “maritime Delta” and at the ruins of Histria fortress (due to confusion with specimens of Lacerta agilis). Also, Podarcis muralis was “recorded” at the ruins of Histria fortress (due to misidentification of specimens belonging to species P. taurica. A corps of snake found at Letea forest was considered by mistake as belonging to species Eryx jaculus. In several official reports (grey literature) the species Elaphe longissima (Zamenis longissimus) was mentioned by mistake as occurring at Letea forest. Elaphe (quatuorlineata) sauromates was “recorded” at the ruins of Histria fortress and at Sfântu Gheorghe due to confusion with specimens belonging to other snake species. Specimens of Vipera urisnii from the Danube Delta were considered as belonging to the species Vipera berus. Also, Vipera ursinii was metioned by mistake at Caraorman marine levee and at Chituc marine levee, based only on the idea that if the species occurs on other marine levees, it has to be present on these two marine levees, too.http://www.ddni.ro/manager/editor/UserFiles/File/Scientific%20annals/volume/18/13.pdfherpetologyReptilesdoubtful recordsDanube Delta Biosphere ReserveRomania
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author TÖRÖK Zsolt Csaba
spellingShingle TÖRÖK Zsolt Csaba
Doubtful records of reptile species in some areas of the Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve (Romania)
Scientific Annals of the Danube Delta Institute
herpetology
Reptiles
doubtful records
Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve
Romania
author_facet TÖRÖK Zsolt Csaba
author_sort TÖRÖK Zsolt Csaba
title Doubtful records of reptile species in some areas of the Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve (Romania)
title_short Doubtful records of reptile species in some areas of the Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve (Romania)
title_full Doubtful records of reptile species in some areas of the Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve (Romania)
title_fullStr Doubtful records of reptile species in some areas of the Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve (Romania)
title_full_unstemmed Doubtful records of reptile species in some areas of the Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve (Romania)
title_sort doubtful records of reptile species in some areas of the danube delta biosphere reserve (romania)
publisher CITDD Publishing House
series Scientific Annals of the Danube Delta Institute
issn 1842-614X
2247-9902
publishDate 2012-09-01
description In the present paper there are provided details on the doubtful data on the occurrence of some reptile species in various parts of the Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve. Testudo graeca was indicated by mistake at Sfântu Gheorghe (probably the authors saw the species in some places from the continental plateau nearby of Sfântu Gheorghe branch, not inside the Danube Delta). Lacerta viridis was mentioned in the so-called “maritime Delta” and at the ruins of Histria fortress (due to confusion with specimens of Lacerta agilis). Also, Podarcis muralis was “recorded” at the ruins of Histria fortress (due to misidentification of specimens belonging to species P. taurica. A corps of snake found at Letea forest was considered by mistake as belonging to species Eryx jaculus. In several official reports (grey literature) the species Elaphe longissima (Zamenis longissimus) was mentioned by mistake as occurring at Letea forest. Elaphe (quatuorlineata) sauromates was “recorded” at the ruins of Histria fortress and at Sfântu Gheorghe due to confusion with specimens belonging to other snake species. Specimens of Vipera urisnii from the Danube Delta were considered as belonging to the species Vipera berus. Also, Vipera ursinii was metioned by mistake at Caraorman marine levee and at Chituc marine levee, based only on the idea that if the species occurs on other marine levees, it has to be present on these two marine levees, too.
topic herpetology
Reptiles
doubtful records
Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve
Romania
url http://www.ddni.ro/manager/editor/UserFiles/File/Scientific%20annals/volume/18/13.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT torokzsoltcsaba doubtfulrecordsofreptilespeciesinsomeareasofthedanubedeltabiospherereserveromania
_version_ 1725944254945034240