The Efficacy and Safety of Mainstream Medications for Patients With cDMARD-Naïve Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Network Meta-Analysis

Background: The mainstream medications for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) include conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (cDMARDs), which mostly are methotrexate (MTX), and biologic agents such as adalimumab (ADA), certolizumab (CZP), etanercept (ETN), golimumab (GOL), infliximab (IFX), and t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Weiyan Cai, Youyi Gu, Huanqin Cui, Yinyin Cao, Xiaoliang Wang, Yi Yao, Mingyu Wang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-03-01
Series:Frontiers in Pharmacology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fphar.2018.00138/full
id doaj-3e53892d249a448da6dbbbfb6bd20eb0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3e53892d249a448da6dbbbfb6bd20eb02020-11-25T00:12:30ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Pharmacology1663-98122018-03-01910.3389/fphar.2018.00138333915The Efficacy and Safety of Mainstream Medications for Patients With cDMARD-Naïve Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Network Meta-AnalysisWeiyan Cai0Youyi Gu1Huanqin Cui2Yinyin Cao3Xiaoliang Wang4Yi Yao5Mingyu Wang6Department of Pediatrics, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital Affiliated to Qingdao Medical College of Qingdao University, Yantai, ChinaDepartment of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital Affiliated to Qingdao Medical College of Qingdao University, Yantai, ChinaDepartment of Pediatrics, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital Affiliated to Qingdao Medical College of Qingdao University, Yantai, ChinaDepartment of Pediatrics, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital Affiliated to Qingdao Medical College of Qingdao University, Yantai, ChinaDepartment of Pediatrics, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital Affiliated to Qingdao Medical College of Qingdao University, Yantai, ChinaDepartment of Pediatrics, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital Affiliated to Qingdao Medical College of Qingdao University, Yantai, ChinaDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital Affiliated to Qingdao Medical College of Qingdao University, Yantai, ChinaBackground: The mainstream medications for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) include conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (cDMARDs), which mostly are methotrexate (MTX), and biologic agents such as adalimumab (ADA), certolizumab (CZP), etanercept (ETN), golimumab (GOL), infliximab (IFX), and tocilizumab (TCZ). This network meta-analysis was aimed at evaluating the efficacy and safety of the medications above and interventions combining cDMARDs and biologic agents for patients with RA.Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched systematically for eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Outcomes concerning efficacy and safety were evaluated utilizing odds ratios (ORs) and 95% credible intervals (CrI). The outcomes of efficacy would be evaluated through remission and American College of Rheumatology (ACR) scores. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was calculated to rank each treatment on each index.Results: A total of 20 RCTs with 9,047 patients were included, and the efficacy and safety of the concerning interventions for RA were evaluated. Compared with cDMARDs alone, TCZ+MTX, ETN+MTX, IFX+MTX, TCZ, and ADA+MTX showed significant statistical advantage on ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70. Apart from that, as for remission, TCZ+MTX, IFX+MTX, TCZ, and CZP+MTX performed better compared to cDMARDs alone. The SUCRA ranking also indicated that TCZ+MTX was the intervention with best ranking in the entire four efficacy indexes followed by ETX+MTX and IFX+MTX. However, there was no obvious difference among these medications compared with cDMARDs when it comes to safety, which need more specific studies on that.Conclusion: TCZ+MTX was potentially the most recommended combination of medications for RA due to its good performance in all outcomes of efficacy. ETX+MTX and IFX+MTX, which also performed well, could be introduced as alternative treatments. However, considering the adverse events, the treatments concerning should be introduced with caution.http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fphar.2018.00138/fullrheumatoid arthritisDMARDssafetyefficacynetwork meta-analysis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Weiyan Cai
Youyi Gu
Huanqin Cui
Yinyin Cao
Xiaoliang Wang
Yi Yao
Mingyu Wang
spellingShingle Weiyan Cai
Youyi Gu
Huanqin Cui
Yinyin Cao
Xiaoliang Wang
Yi Yao
Mingyu Wang
The Efficacy and Safety of Mainstream Medications for Patients With cDMARD-Naïve Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Network Meta-Analysis
Frontiers in Pharmacology
rheumatoid arthritis
DMARDs
safety
efficacy
network meta-analysis
author_facet Weiyan Cai
Youyi Gu
Huanqin Cui
Yinyin Cao
Xiaoliang Wang
Yi Yao
Mingyu Wang
author_sort Weiyan Cai
title The Efficacy and Safety of Mainstream Medications for Patients With cDMARD-Naïve Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Network Meta-Analysis
title_short The Efficacy and Safety of Mainstream Medications for Patients With cDMARD-Naïve Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Network Meta-Analysis
title_full The Efficacy and Safety of Mainstream Medications for Patients With cDMARD-Naïve Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Network Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr The Efficacy and Safety of Mainstream Medications for Patients With cDMARD-Naïve Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Network Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed The Efficacy and Safety of Mainstream Medications for Patients With cDMARD-Naïve Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Network Meta-Analysis
title_sort efficacy and safety of mainstream medications for patients with cdmard-naïve rheumatoid arthritis: a network meta-analysis
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Pharmacology
issn 1663-9812
publishDate 2018-03-01
description Background: The mainstream medications for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) include conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (cDMARDs), which mostly are methotrexate (MTX), and biologic agents such as adalimumab (ADA), certolizumab (CZP), etanercept (ETN), golimumab (GOL), infliximab (IFX), and tocilizumab (TCZ). This network meta-analysis was aimed at evaluating the efficacy and safety of the medications above and interventions combining cDMARDs and biologic agents for patients with RA.Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched systematically for eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Outcomes concerning efficacy and safety were evaluated utilizing odds ratios (ORs) and 95% credible intervals (CrI). The outcomes of efficacy would be evaluated through remission and American College of Rheumatology (ACR) scores. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was calculated to rank each treatment on each index.Results: A total of 20 RCTs with 9,047 patients were included, and the efficacy and safety of the concerning interventions for RA were evaluated. Compared with cDMARDs alone, TCZ+MTX, ETN+MTX, IFX+MTX, TCZ, and ADA+MTX showed significant statistical advantage on ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70. Apart from that, as for remission, TCZ+MTX, IFX+MTX, TCZ, and CZP+MTX performed better compared to cDMARDs alone. The SUCRA ranking also indicated that TCZ+MTX was the intervention with best ranking in the entire four efficacy indexes followed by ETX+MTX and IFX+MTX. However, there was no obvious difference among these medications compared with cDMARDs when it comes to safety, which need more specific studies on that.Conclusion: TCZ+MTX was potentially the most recommended combination of medications for RA due to its good performance in all outcomes of efficacy. ETX+MTX and IFX+MTX, which also performed well, could be introduced as alternative treatments. However, considering the adverse events, the treatments concerning should be introduced with caution.
topic rheumatoid arthritis
DMARDs
safety
efficacy
network meta-analysis
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fphar.2018.00138/full
work_keys_str_mv AT weiyancai theefficacyandsafetyofmainstreammedicationsforpatientswithcdmardnaiverheumatoidarthritisanetworkmetaanalysis
AT youyigu theefficacyandsafetyofmainstreammedicationsforpatientswithcdmardnaiverheumatoidarthritisanetworkmetaanalysis
AT huanqincui theefficacyandsafetyofmainstreammedicationsforpatientswithcdmardnaiverheumatoidarthritisanetworkmetaanalysis
AT yinyincao theefficacyandsafetyofmainstreammedicationsforpatientswithcdmardnaiverheumatoidarthritisanetworkmetaanalysis
AT xiaoliangwang theefficacyandsafetyofmainstreammedicationsforpatientswithcdmardnaiverheumatoidarthritisanetworkmetaanalysis
AT yiyao theefficacyandsafetyofmainstreammedicationsforpatientswithcdmardnaiverheumatoidarthritisanetworkmetaanalysis
AT mingyuwang theefficacyandsafetyofmainstreammedicationsforpatientswithcdmardnaiverheumatoidarthritisanetworkmetaanalysis
AT weiyancai efficacyandsafetyofmainstreammedicationsforpatientswithcdmardnaiverheumatoidarthritisanetworkmetaanalysis
AT youyigu efficacyandsafetyofmainstreammedicationsforpatientswithcdmardnaiverheumatoidarthritisanetworkmetaanalysis
AT huanqincui efficacyandsafetyofmainstreammedicationsforpatientswithcdmardnaiverheumatoidarthritisanetworkmetaanalysis
AT yinyincao efficacyandsafetyofmainstreammedicationsforpatientswithcdmardnaiverheumatoidarthritisanetworkmetaanalysis
AT xiaoliangwang efficacyandsafetyofmainstreammedicationsforpatientswithcdmardnaiverheumatoidarthritisanetworkmetaanalysis
AT yiyao efficacyandsafetyofmainstreammedicationsforpatientswithcdmardnaiverheumatoidarthritisanetworkmetaanalysis
AT mingyuwang efficacyandsafetyofmainstreammedicationsforpatientswithcdmardnaiverheumatoidarthritisanetworkmetaanalysis
_version_ 1725399323217231872