A Cost-Effective Analysis of 3D Printing Applications in Occupational Therapy Practice

Background: Emerging research supports 3D printing can provide customizable, low-cost, and replicable items for application in occupational therapy, but more research is necessary to inform occupational therapists on why and how 3D printing would be applicable and feasible in practice. Method: Th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Megan Hunzeker, Rebecca Ozelie
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Western Michigan University 2021-01-01
Series:Open Journal of Occupational Therapy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/ojot/vol9/iss1/4/
id doaj-3e34d41fb9ae4cd99cf0e4cb87115c74
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3e34d41fb9ae4cd99cf0e4cb87115c742021-01-20T02:12:07ZengWestern Michigan University Open Journal of Occupational Therapy 2168-64082168-64082021-01-0191112https://doi.org/10.15453/2168-6408.1751 A Cost-Effective Analysis of 3D Printing Applications in Occupational Therapy PracticeMegan HunzekerRebecca OzelieBackground: Emerging research supports 3D printing can provide customizable, low-cost, and replicable items for application in occupational therapy, but more research is necessary to inform occupational therapists on why and how 3D printing would be applicable and feasible in practice. Method: This study is a cost-effective analysis aimed to identify practical considerations of a selection of 3D printed items in comparison to commercially available items. Ten items of adaptive equipment were downloaded from open-sourced 3D printing design websites and printed. The estimated cost of material was calculated and each print time was recorded. Items with comparable design and function were selected from a thorough internet search for analysis and comparison to the 3D printed items. Results: The results demonstrate that each 3D printed item had a positive benefit in terms of material cost and print time compared to the cost and shipping time of each comparable item. Conclusion: The 3D printed items were the more cost-effective for all items, but most significantly for niche designs with fewer available commercial alternatives. 3D printing successfully replicated commonly used adaptive equipment for a comparable cost, while allowing for customization and the ability to provide the item in-house to clients.https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/ojot/vol9/iss1/4/adaptive equipmentassistive devicetechnology
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Megan Hunzeker
Rebecca Ozelie
spellingShingle Megan Hunzeker
Rebecca Ozelie
A Cost-Effective Analysis of 3D Printing Applications in Occupational Therapy Practice
Open Journal of Occupational Therapy
adaptive equipment
assistive device
technology
author_facet Megan Hunzeker
Rebecca Ozelie
author_sort Megan Hunzeker
title A Cost-Effective Analysis of 3D Printing Applications in Occupational Therapy Practice
title_short A Cost-Effective Analysis of 3D Printing Applications in Occupational Therapy Practice
title_full A Cost-Effective Analysis of 3D Printing Applications in Occupational Therapy Practice
title_fullStr A Cost-Effective Analysis of 3D Printing Applications in Occupational Therapy Practice
title_full_unstemmed A Cost-Effective Analysis of 3D Printing Applications in Occupational Therapy Practice
title_sort cost-effective analysis of 3d printing applications in occupational therapy practice
publisher Western Michigan University
series Open Journal of Occupational Therapy
issn 2168-6408
2168-6408
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Background: Emerging research supports 3D printing can provide customizable, low-cost, and replicable items for application in occupational therapy, but more research is necessary to inform occupational therapists on why and how 3D printing would be applicable and feasible in practice. Method: This study is a cost-effective analysis aimed to identify practical considerations of a selection of 3D printed items in comparison to commercially available items. Ten items of adaptive equipment were downloaded from open-sourced 3D printing design websites and printed. The estimated cost of material was calculated and each print time was recorded. Items with comparable design and function were selected from a thorough internet search for analysis and comparison to the 3D printed items. Results: The results demonstrate that each 3D printed item had a positive benefit in terms of material cost and print time compared to the cost and shipping time of each comparable item. Conclusion: The 3D printed items were the more cost-effective for all items, but most significantly for niche designs with fewer available commercial alternatives. 3D printing successfully replicated commonly used adaptive equipment for a comparable cost, while allowing for customization and the ability to provide the item in-house to clients.
topic adaptive equipment
assistive device
technology
url https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/ojot/vol9/iss1/4/
work_keys_str_mv AT meganhunzeker acosteffectiveanalysisof3dprintingapplicationsinoccupationaltherapypractice
AT rebeccaozelie acosteffectiveanalysisof3dprintingapplicationsinoccupationaltherapypractice
AT meganhunzeker costeffectiveanalysisof3dprintingapplicationsinoccupationaltherapypractice
AT rebeccaozelie costeffectiveanalysisof3dprintingapplicationsinoccupationaltherapypractice
_version_ 1724331386471448576