Comparative analysis of deep learning image detection algorithms
Abstract A computer views all kinds of visual media as an array of numerical values. As a consequence of this approach, they require image processing algorithms to inspect contents of images. This project compares 3 major image processing algorithms: Single Shot Detection (SSD), Faster Region based...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SpringerOpen
2021-05-01
|
Series: | Journal of Big Data |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-021-00434-w |
id |
doaj-3e25a12fb6d34a2694ac53c2747a1823 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-3e25a12fb6d34a2694ac53c2747a18232021-05-11T15:01:16ZengSpringerOpenJournal of Big Data2196-11152021-05-018112710.1186/s40537-021-00434-wComparative analysis of deep learning image detection algorithmsShrey Srivastava0Amit Vishvas Divekar1Chandu Anilkumar2Ishika Naik3Ved Kulkarni4V. Pattabiraman5Vellore Institute of Technology (Chennai Campus)Vellore Institute of Technology (Chennai Campus)Vellore Institute of Technology (Chennai Campus)Vellore Institute of Technology (Chennai Campus)Vellore Institute of Technology (Chennai Campus)Vellore Institute of Technology (Chennai Campus)Abstract A computer views all kinds of visual media as an array of numerical values. As a consequence of this approach, they require image processing algorithms to inspect contents of images. This project compares 3 major image processing algorithms: Single Shot Detection (SSD), Faster Region based Convolutional Neural Networks (Faster R-CNN), and You Only Look Once (YOLO) to find the fastest and most efficient of three. In this comparative analysis, using the Microsoft COCO (Common Object in Context) dataset, the performance of these three algorithms is evaluated and their strengths and limitations are analysed based on parameters such as accuracy, precision and F1 score. From the results of the analysis, it can be concluded that the suitability of any of the algorithms over the other two is dictated to a great extent by the use cases they are applied in. In an identical testing environment, YOLO-v3 outperforms SSD and Faster R-CNN, making it the best of the three algorithms.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-021-00434-wObject detectionFRCNNYOLO-v3SSDCOCO dataset |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Shrey Srivastava Amit Vishvas Divekar Chandu Anilkumar Ishika Naik Ved Kulkarni V. Pattabiraman |
spellingShingle |
Shrey Srivastava Amit Vishvas Divekar Chandu Anilkumar Ishika Naik Ved Kulkarni V. Pattabiraman Comparative analysis of deep learning image detection algorithms Journal of Big Data Object detection FRCNN YOLO-v3 SSD COCO dataset |
author_facet |
Shrey Srivastava Amit Vishvas Divekar Chandu Anilkumar Ishika Naik Ved Kulkarni V. Pattabiraman |
author_sort |
Shrey Srivastava |
title |
Comparative analysis of deep learning image detection algorithms |
title_short |
Comparative analysis of deep learning image detection algorithms |
title_full |
Comparative analysis of deep learning image detection algorithms |
title_fullStr |
Comparative analysis of deep learning image detection algorithms |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparative analysis of deep learning image detection algorithms |
title_sort |
comparative analysis of deep learning image detection algorithms |
publisher |
SpringerOpen |
series |
Journal of Big Data |
issn |
2196-1115 |
publishDate |
2021-05-01 |
description |
Abstract A computer views all kinds of visual media as an array of numerical values. As a consequence of this approach, they require image processing algorithms to inspect contents of images. This project compares 3 major image processing algorithms: Single Shot Detection (SSD), Faster Region based Convolutional Neural Networks (Faster R-CNN), and You Only Look Once (YOLO) to find the fastest and most efficient of three. In this comparative analysis, using the Microsoft COCO (Common Object in Context) dataset, the performance of these three algorithms is evaluated and their strengths and limitations are analysed based on parameters such as accuracy, precision and F1 score. From the results of the analysis, it can be concluded that the suitability of any of the algorithms over the other two is dictated to a great extent by the use cases they are applied in. In an identical testing environment, YOLO-v3 outperforms SSD and Faster R-CNN, making it the best of the three algorithms. |
topic |
Object detection FRCNN YOLO-v3 SSD COCO dataset |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-021-00434-w |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT shreysrivastava comparativeanalysisofdeeplearningimagedetectionalgorithms AT amitvishvasdivekar comparativeanalysisofdeeplearningimagedetectionalgorithms AT chanduanilkumar comparativeanalysisofdeeplearningimagedetectionalgorithms AT ishikanaik comparativeanalysisofdeeplearningimagedetectionalgorithms AT vedkulkarni comparativeanalysisofdeeplearningimagedetectionalgorithms AT vpattabiraman comparativeanalysisofdeeplearningimagedetectionalgorithms |
_version_ |
1721443737630932992 |