Bond strength of zirconia- or polymer-based copings cemented on implant-supported titanium bases – an in vitro study

Purpose To evaluate the bond strength between polymer-based copings and zirconia copings as positive control, cemented on implant-supported titanium bases with different adhesive cement systems. Moreover, to evaluate if airborne-particle abrasion of polymethylmetacrylate (PMMA) would enhance the bon...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eliann Oddbratt, Lisa Hua, Bruno R. Chrcanovic, Evaggelia Papia
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2021-01-01
Series:Biomaterial Investigations in Dentistry
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2021.1974301
id doaj-3e1aec71da9b4a43b73e16b9ade17f36
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3e1aec71da9b4a43b73e16b9ade17f362021-09-20T13:17:23ZengTaylor & Francis GroupBiomaterial Investigations in Dentistry2641-52752021-01-018112913610.1080/26415275.2021.19743011974301Bond strength of zirconia- or polymer-based copings cemented on implant-supported titanium bases – an in vitro studyEliann Oddbratt0Lisa Hua1Bruno R. Chrcanovic2Evaggelia Papia3Department of Materials Science and Technology, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö UniversityDepartment of Materials Science and Technology, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö UniversityDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö UniversityDepartment of Materials Science and Technology, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö UniversityPurpose To evaluate the bond strength between polymer-based copings and zirconia copings as positive control, cemented on implant-supported titanium bases with different adhesive cement systems. Moreover, to evaluate if airborne-particle abrasion of polymethylmetacrylate (PMMA) would enhance the bond strength. Methods Four groups of different materials were used to fabricate the copings, 30 in each group: airborne-particle abraded milled zirconia (TAZirconia, control group), milled PMMA (TPMMA), airborne-particle abraded milled PMMA (TAPMMA) and 3 D-printed micro filled hybrid resin (TAMFH). Each group of copings was cemented on titanium bases by three different adhesive cement systems, 10 each: Multilink Hybrid Abutment, Panavia V5, RelyX Ultimate. The specimens were stored dry at room temperature for 24 h, subjected to thermocycling for 5000 cycles followed by evaluating the bond strength by tensile strength test. Results TPMMA and TAPMMA cemented with Multilink Hybrid Abutment showed statistically significant lower bond strength in comparison to TAZirconia and TAMFH. No difference was observed between the latter two. TPMMA, TAPMMA and TAMFH had a statistically significant lower bond strength compared to the control group when cemented with Panavia V5. TPMMA and TAPMMA cemented with Rely X Ultimate showed statistically significant lower bond strength in comparison to the control group. Conclusion Almost all experimental groups, except 3 D-printed MFH, performed inferior than the positive control group where the highest bond strength was reported for the cementation of zirconia copings cemented with Panavia V5 or Rely X Ultimate. Airborne-particle abrasion did not improve the bond strength of the PMMA, except when Multilink Hybrid Abutment was used.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2021.1974301adhesive cementationbond strengthpolymer-based materialstitanium base implant-supported dental prosthesiszirconia
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Eliann Oddbratt
Lisa Hua
Bruno R. Chrcanovic
Evaggelia Papia
spellingShingle Eliann Oddbratt
Lisa Hua
Bruno R. Chrcanovic
Evaggelia Papia
Bond strength of zirconia- or polymer-based copings cemented on implant-supported titanium bases – an in vitro study
Biomaterial Investigations in Dentistry
adhesive cementation
bond strength
polymer-based materials
titanium base implant-supported dental prosthesis
zirconia
author_facet Eliann Oddbratt
Lisa Hua
Bruno R. Chrcanovic
Evaggelia Papia
author_sort Eliann Oddbratt
title Bond strength of zirconia- or polymer-based copings cemented on implant-supported titanium bases – an in vitro study
title_short Bond strength of zirconia- or polymer-based copings cemented on implant-supported titanium bases – an in vitro study
title_full Bond strength of zirconia- or polymer-based copings cemented on implant-supported titanium bases – an in vitro study
title_fullStr Bond strength of zirconia- or polymer-based copings cemented on implant-supported titanium bases – an in vitro study
title_full_unstemmed Bond strength of zirconia- or polymer-based copings cemented on implant-supported titanium bases – an in vitro study
title_sort bond strength of zirconia- or polymer-based copings cemented on implant-supported titanium bases – an in vitro study
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Biomaterial Investigations in Dentistry
issn 2641-5275
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Purpose To evaluate the bond strength between polymer-based copings and zirconia copings as positive control, cemented on implant-supported titanium bases with different adhesive cement systems. Moreover, to evaluate if airborne-particle abrasion of polymethylmetacrylate (PMMA) would enhance the bond strength. Methods Four groups of different materials were used to fabricate the copings, 30 in each group: airborne-particle abraded milled zirconia (TAZirconia, control group), milled PMMA (TPMMA), airborne-particle abraded milled PMMA (TAPMMA) and 3 D-printed micro filled hybrid resin (TAMFH). Each group of copings was cemented on titanium bases by three different adhesive cement systems, 10 each: Multilink Hybrid Abutment, Panavia V5, RelyX Ultimate. The specimens were stored dry at room temperature for 24 h, subjected to thermocycling for 5000 cycles followed by evaluating the bond strength by tensile strength test. Results TPMMA and TAPMMA cemented with Multilink Hybrid Abutment showed statistically significant lower bond strength in comparison to TAZirconia and TAMFH. No difference was observed between the latter two. TPMMA, TAPMMA and TAMFH had a statistically significant lower bond strength compared to the control group when cemented with Panavia V5. TPMMA and TAPMMA cemented with Rely X Ultimate showed statistically significant lower bond strength in comparison to the control group. Conclusion Almost all experimental groups, except 3 D-printed MFH, performed inferior than the positive control group where the highest bond strength was reported for the cementation of zirconia copings cemented with Panavia V5 or Rely X Ultimate. Airborne-particle abrasion did not improve the bond strength of the PMMA, except when Multilink Hybrid Abutment was used.
topic adhesive cementation
bond strength
polymer-based materials
titanium base implant-supported dental prosthesis
zirconia
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2021.1974301
work_keys_str_mv AT eliannoddbratt bondstrengthofzirconiaorpolymerbasedcopingscementedonimplantsupportedtitaniumbasesaninvitrostudy
AT lisahua bondstrengthofzirconiaorpolymerbasedcopingscementedonimplantsupportedtitaniumbasesaninvitrostudy
AT brunorchrcanovic bondstrengthofzirconiaorpolymerbasedcopingscementedonimplantsupportedtitaniumbasesaninvitrostudy
AT evaggeliapapia bondstrengthofzirconiaorpolymerbasedcopingscementedonimplantsupportedtitaniumbasesaninvitrostudy
_version_ 1717374229410742272