Bond strength of zirconia- or polymer-based copings cemented on implant-supported titanium bases – an in vitro study
Purpose To evaluate the bond strength between polymer-based copings and zirconia copings as positive control, cemented on implant-supported titanium bases with different adhesive cement systems. Moreover, to evaluate if airborne-particle abrasion of polymethylmetacrylate (PMMA) would enhance the bon...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2021-01-01
|
Series: | Biomaterial Investigations in Dentistry |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2021.1974301 |
id |
doaj-3e1aec71da9b4a43b73e16b9ade17f36 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-3e1aec71da9b4a43b73e16b9ade17f362021-09-20T13:17:23ZengTaylor & Francis GroupBiomaterial Investigations in Dentistry2641-52752021-01-018112913610.1080/26415275.2021.19743011974301Bond strength of zirconia- or polymer-based copings cemented on implant-supported titanium bases – an in vitro studyEliann Oddbratt0Lisa Hua1Bruno R. Chrcanovic2Evaggelia Papia3Department of Materials Science and Technology, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö UniversityDepartment of Materials Science and Technology, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö UniversityDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö UniversityDepartment of Materials Science and Technology, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö UniversityPurpose To evaluate the bond strength between polymer-based copings and zirconia copings as positive control, cemented on implant-supported titanium bases with different adhesive cement systems. Moreover, to evaluate if airborne-particle abrasion of polymethylmetacrylate (PMMA) would enhance the bond strength. Methods Four groups of different materials were used to fabricate the copings, 30 in each group: airborne-particle abraded milled zirconia (TAZirconia, control group), milled PMMA (TPMMA), airborne-particle abraded milled PMMA (TAPMMA) and 3 D-printed micro filled hybrid resin (TAMFH). Each group of copings was cemented on titanium bases by three different adhesive cement systems, 10 each: Multilink Hybrid Abutment, Panavia V5, RelyX Ultimate. The specimens were stored dry at room temperature for 24 h, subjected to thermocycling for 5000 cycles followed by evaluating the bond strength by tensile strength test. Results TPMMA and TAPMMA cemented with Multilink Hybrid Abutment showed statistically significant lower bond strength in comparison to TAZirconia and TAMFH. No difference was observed between the latter two. TPMMA, TAPMMA and TAMFH had a statistically significant lower bond strength compared to the control group when cemented with Panavia V5. TPMMA and TAPMMA cemented with Rely X Ultimate showed statistically significant lower bond strength in comparison to the control group. Conclusion Almost all experimental groups, except 3 D-printed MFH, performed inferior than the positive control group where the highest bond strength was reported for the cementation of zirconia copings cemented with Panavia V5 or Rely X Ultimate. Airborne-particle abrasion did not improve the bond strength of the PMMA, except when Multilink Hybrid Abutment was used.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2021.1974301adhesive cementationbond strengthpolymer-based materialstitanium base implant-supported dental prosthesiszirconia |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Eliann Oddbratt Lisa Hua Bruno R. Chrcanovic Evaggelia Papia |
spellingShingle |
Eliann Oddbratt Lisa Hua Bruno R. Chrcanovic Evaggelia Papia Bond strength of zirconia- or polymer-based copings cemented on implant-supported titanium bases – an in vitro study Biomaterial Investigations in Dentistry adhesive cementation bond strength polymer-based materials titanium base implant-supported dental prosthesis zirconia |
author_facet |
Eliann Oddbratt Lisa Hua Bruno R. Chrcanovic Evaggelia Papia |
author_sort |
Eliann Oddbratt |
title |
Bond strength of zirconia- or polymer-based copings cemented on implant-supported titanium bases – an in vitro study |
title_short |
Bond strength of zirconia- or polymer-based copings cemented on implant-supported titanium bases – an in vitro study |
title_full |
Bond strength of zirconia- or polymer-based copings cemented on implant-supported titanium bases – an in vitro study |
title_fullStr |
Bond strength of zirconia- or polymer-based copings cemented on implant-supported titanium bases – an in vitro study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Bond strength of zirconia- or polymer-based copings cemented on implant-supported titanium bases – an in vitro study |
title_sort |
bond strength of zirconia- or polymer-based copings cemented on implant-supported titanium bases – an in vitro study |
publisher |
Taylor & Francis Group |
series |
Biomaterial Investigations in Dentistry |
issn |
2641-5275 |
publishDate |
2021-01-01 |
description |
Purpose To evaluate the bond strength between polymer-based copings and zirconia copings as positive control, cemented on implant-supported titanium bases with different adhesive cement systems. Moreover, to evaluate if airborne-particle abrasion of polymethylmetacrylate (PMMA) would enhance the bond strength. Methods Four groups of different materials were used to fabricate the copings, 30 in each group: airborne-particle abraded milled zirconia (TAZirconia, control group), milled PMMA (TPMMA), airborne-particle abraded milled PMMA (TAPMMA) and 3 D-printed micro filled hybrid resin (TAMFH). Each group of copings was cemented on titanium bases by three different adhesive cement systems, 10 each: Multilink Hybrid Abutment, Panavia V5, RelyX Ultimate. The specimens were stored dry at room temperature for 24 h, subjected to thermocycling for 5000 cycles followed by evaluating the bond strength by tensile strength test. Results TPMMA and TAPMMA cemented with Multilink Hybrid Abutment showed statistically significant lower bond strength in comparison to TAZirconia and TAMFH. No difference was observed between the latter two. TPMMA, TAPMMA and TAMFH had a statistically significant lower bond strength compared to the control group when cemented with Panavia V5. TPMMA and TAPMMA cemented with Rely X Ultimate showed statistically significant lower bond strength in comparison to the control group. Conclusion Almost all experimental groups, except 3 D-printed MFH, performed inferior than the positive control group where the highest bond strength was reported for the cementation of zirconia copings cemented with Panavia V5 or Rely X Ultimate. Airborne-particle abrasion did not improve the bond strength of the PMMA, except when Multilink Hybrid Abutment was used. |
topic |
adhesive cementation bond strength polymer-based materials titanium base implant-supported dental prosthesis zirconia |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2021.1974301 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT eliannoddbratt bondstrengthofzirconiaorpolymerbasedcopingscementedonimplantsupportedtitaniumbasesaninvitrostudy AT lisahua bondstrengthofzirconiaorpolymerbasedcopingscementedonimplantsupportedtitaniumbasesaninvitrostudy AT brunorchrcanovic bondstrengthofzirconiaorpolymerbasedcopingscementedonimplantsupportedtitaniumbasesaninvitrostudy AT evaggeliapapia bondstrengthofzirconiaorpolymerbasedcopingscementedonimplantsupportedtitaniumbasesaninvitrostudy |
_version_ |
1717374229410742272 |