Similarity-Based Interference and the Acquisition of Adjunct Control

Previous research on the acquisition of adjunct control has observed non-adultlike behavior for sentences like “John bumped Mary after tripping on the sidewalk.” While adults only allow a subject control interpretation for these sentences (that John tripped on the sidewalk), preschool-aged children...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Juliana Gerard, Jeffrey Lidz, Shalom Zuckerman, Manuela Pinto
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-10-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01822/full
id doaj-3e19fea5f7cf4c548a9c3ef912ae9f80
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3e19fea5f7cf4c548a9c3ef912ae9f802020-11-25T00:12:30ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782017-10-01810.3389/fpsyg.2017.01822289363Similarity-Based Interference and the Acquisition of Adjunct ControlJuliana Gerard0Jeffrey Lidz1Shalom Zuckerman2Manuela Pinto3School of Communication and Media, Ulster University, Jordanstown, United KingdomDepartment of Linguistics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, United StatesUtrecht Institute of Linguistics OTS, Department of Languages, Literature and Communication, Utrecht University, Utrecht, NetherlandsUtrecht Institute of Linguistics OTS, Department of Languages, Literature and Communication, Utrecht University, Utrecht, NetherlandsPrevious research on the acquisition of adjunct control has observed non-adultlike behavior for sentences like “John bumped Mary after tripping on the sidewalk.” While adults only allow a subject control interpretation for these sentences (that John tripped on the sidewalk), preschool-aged children have been reported to allow a much wider range of interpretations. A number of different tasks have been used with the aim of identifying a grammatical source of children’s errors. In this paper, we consider the role of extragrammatical factors. In two comprehension experiments, we demonstrate that error rates go up when the similarity increases between an antecedent and a linearly intervening noun phrase, first with similarity in gender, and next with similarity in number marking. This suggests that difficulties with adjunct control are to be explained (at least in part) by the sentence processing mechanisms that underlie similarity-based interference in adults.http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01822/fulladjunct controllanguage acquisitionsimilarity-based interferenceinterventionbindinganaphora
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Juliana Gerard
Jeffrey Lidz
Shalom Zuckerman
Manuela Pinto
spellingShingle Juliana Gerard
Jeffrey Lidz
Shalom Zuckerman
Manuela Pinto
Similarity-Based Interference and the Acquisition of Adjunct Control
Frontiers in Psychology
adjunct control
language acquisition
similarity-based interference
intervention
binding
anaphora
author_facet Juliana Gerard
Jeffrey Lidz
Shalom Zuckerman
Manuela Pinto
author_sort Juliana Gerard
title Similarity-Based Interference and the Acquisition of Adjunct Control
title_short Similarity-Based Interference and the Acquisition of Adjunct Control
title_full Similarity-Based Interference and the Acquisition of Adjunct Control
title_fullStr Similarity-Based Interference and the Acquisition of Adjunct Control
title_full_unstemmed Similarity-Based Interference and the Acquisition of Adjunct Control
title_sort similarity-based interference and the acquisition of adjunct control
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2017-10-01
description Previous research on the acquisition of adjunct control has observed non-adultlike behavior for sentences like “John bumped Mary after tripping on the sidewalk.” While adults only allow a subject control interpretation for these sentences (that John tripped on the sidewalk), preschool-aged children have been reported to allow a much wider range of interpretations. A number of different tasks have been used with the aim of identifying a grammatical source of children’s errors. In this paper, we consider the role of extragrammatical factors. In two comprehension experiments, we demonstrate that error rates go up when the similarity increases between an antecedent and a linearly intervening noun phrase, first with similarity in gender, and next with similarity in number marking. This suggests that difficulties with adjunct control are to be explained (at least in part) by the sentence processing mechanisms that underlie similarity-based interference in adults.
topic adjunct control
language acquisition
similarity-based interference
intervention
binding
anaphora
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01822/full
work_keys_str_mv AT julianagerard similaritybasedinterferenceandtheacquisitionofadjunctcontrol
AT jeffreylidz similaritybasedinterferenceandtheacquisitionofadjunctcontrol
AT shalomzuckerman similaritybasedinterferenceandtheacquisitionofadjunctcontrol
AT manuelapinto similaritybasedinterferenceandtheacquisitionofadjunctcontrol
_version_ 1725399310337572864