Patrimonio nacional. Poblaciones indigenas y patrimonio intangible

During the second half of the Nineteenth Century successive Argentine governments brought into national history a new sense of nationalism. This nationalism was not based on native traditions or the colonial past, rather it was designed and created by European immigrants; indigenous people were excl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Verónica Isabel Williams
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Centre de Recherches sur les Mondes Américains 2013-10-01
Series:Nuevo mundo - Mundos Nuevos
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/nuevomundo/65998
id doaj-3e162928725343e1b648553e5c5799c9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3e162928725343e1b648553e5c5799c92020-11-24T21:17:12ZengCentre de Recherches sur les Mondes AméricainsNuevo mundo - Mundos Nuevos1626-02522013-10-0110.4000/nuevomundo.65998Patrimonio nacional. Poblaciones indigenas y patrimonio intangibleVerónica Isabel WilliamsDuring the second half of the Nineteenth Century successive Argentine governments brought into national history a new sense of nationalism. This nationalism was not based on native traditions or the colonial past, rather it was designed and created by European immigrants; indigenous people were excluded from this process. In this article we examine themes such as cultural heritage and indigenous heritage. We also assess how the archaeological heritage and narratives of the past are integral to present-day ethnic rights movements, which in turn impacts on the relationships between communities, archaeologists and the State. This situation of “emergent disputes” elucidates the existing asymmetries whereby state officials, academics and private citizens, at different times, have heritagized, lobbied, “protected”, and administered the heritage, without accounting for the participation of indigenous groups. Parting from this particular framework we consider case studies from the Andes and Northeastern Argentina, were we interpret the landscape as heritage tracing the interrelation between the physical landscape and social memory, power and knowledge. We adopt a theoretical-methodological perspective that emphasizes the role played by the asymmetric relationships between the different actors and the process by which this interaction is established across time. This study draws on historical and ethnographic data.http://journals.openedition.org/nuevomundo/65998national heritageintangible patrimonyclaimsmaterialitylandscapeoriginal population
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Verónica Isabel Williams
spellingShingle Verónica Isabel Williams
Patrimonio nacional. Poblaciones indigenas y patrimonio intangible
Nuevo mundo - Mundos Nuevos
national heritage
intangible patrimony
claims
materiality
landscape
original population
author_facet Verónica Isabel Williams
author_sort Verónica Isabel Williams
title Patrimonio nacional. Poblaciones indigenas y patrimonio intangible
title_short Patrimonio nacional. Poblaciones indigenas y patrimonio intangible
title_full Patrimonio nacional. Poblaciones indigenas y patrimonio intangible
title_fullStr Patrimonio nacional. Poblaciones indigenas y patrimonio intangible
title_full_unstemmed Patrimonio nacional. Poblaciones indigenas y patrimonio intangible
title_sort patrimonio nacional. poblaciones indigenas y patrimonio intangible
publisher Centre de Recherches sur les Mondes Américains
series Nuevo mundo - Mundos Nuevos
issn 1626-0252
publishDate 2013-10-01
description During the second half of the Nineteenth Century successive Argentine governments brought into national history a new sense of nationalism. This nationalism was not based on native traditions or the colonial past, rather it was designed and created by European immigrants; indigenous people were excluded from this process. In this article we examine themes such as cultural heritage and indigenous heritage. We also assess how the archaeological heritage and narratives of the past are integral to present-day ethnic rights movements, which in turn impacts on the relationships between communities, archaeologists and the State. This situation of “emergent disputes” elucidates the existing asymmetries whereby state officials, academics and private citizens, at different times, have heritagized, lobbied, “protected”, and administered the heritage, without accounting for the participation of indigenous groups. Parting from this particular framework we consider case studies from the Andes and Northeastern Argentina, were we interpret the landscape as heritage tracing the interrelation between the physical landscape and social memory, power and knowledge. We adopt a theoretical-methodological perspective that emphasizes the role played by the asymmetric relationships between the different actors and the process by which this interaction is established across time. This study draws on historical and ethnographic data.
topic national heritage
intangible patrimony
claims
materiality
landscape
original population
url http://journals.openedition.org/nuevomundo/65998
work_keys_str_mv AT veronicaisabelwilliams patrimonionacionalpoblacionesindigenasypatrimoniointangible
_version_ 1726013625981730816