Follow the Connections! Finding the Big Picture of Internet Communications

Many tools can be used to track down, store and comprehensively evaluate digital objects, things like how “buzz” develops and how “sentiments” are determined. This information can be used to develop a general evaluation of certain products or a schedule for releasing marketing material on these prod...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Maireder Axel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2014-11-01
Series:GfK Marketing Intelligence Review
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/gfkmir.2014.6.issue-2/gfkmir-2014-0099/gfkmir-2014-0099.xml?format=INT
id doaj-3e0fd2e4973b4f3cb56a439201c6c7d5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3e0fd2e4973b4f3cb56a439201c6c7d52020-11-25T01:49:16ZengSciendoGfK Marketing Intelligence Review1865-58662014-11-0162525810.2478/gfkmir-2014-0099gfkmir-2014-0099Follow the Connections! Finding the Big Picture of Internet CommunicationsMaireder Axel0Head of the TANEP project, Department of Communications, University of Vienna, AustriaMany tools can be used to track down, store and comprehensively evaluate digital objects, things like how “buzz” develops and how “sentiments” are determined. This information can be used to develop a general evaluation of certain products or a schedule for releasing marketing material on these products. At the same time, the relevance of individual digital objects (e.g., tweets, blog posts and YouTube videos) and actors (e.g., individuals, media and organizations) frequently remains just as much of a mystery as the high-level networking and dynamics of the discussion do. It is the dynamics of these networks that most significantly contribute to the way that opinions are shaped on the Internet and determine whether videos go “viral” and discussions become “flame wars.” As part of the TANEP (Towards an Analytics of Networked Publics) project, the GfK Verein is funding research on methods that can bring these dynamics to visual life and, as a result, reflect the essence of the Internet as a network. The article demonstartes how information is gathered and what it can tell us.http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/gfkmir.2014.6.issue-2/gfkmir-2014-0099/gfkmir-2014-0099.xml?format=INTNetwork AnalysisInternet CommunicationsOnline DiscourseOnline CommunitiesTwitter
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Maireder Axel
spellingShingle Maireder Axel
Follow the Connections! Finding the Big Picture of Internet Communications
GfK Marketing Intelligence Review
Network Analysis
Internet Communications
Online Discourse
Online Communities
Twitter
author_facet Maireder Axel
author_sort Maireder Axel
title Follow the Connections! Finding the Big Picture of Internet Communications
title_short Follow the Connections! Finding the Big Picture of Internet Communications
title_full Follow the Connections! Finding the Big Picture of Internet Communications
title_fullStr Follow the Connections! Finding the Big Picture of Internet Communications
title_full_unstemmed Follow the Connections! Finding the Big Picture of Internet Communications
title_sort follow the connections! finding the big picture of internet communications
publisher Sciendo
series GfK Marketing Intelligence Review
issn 1865-5866
publishDate 2014-11-01
description Many tools can be used to track down, store and comprehensively evaluate digital objects, things like how “buzz” develops and how “sentiments” are determined. This information can be used to develop a general evaluation of certain products or a schedule for releasing marketing material on these products. At the same time, the relevance of individual digital objects (e.g., tweets, blog posts and YouTube videos) and actors (e.g., individuals, media and organizations) frequently remains just as much of a mystery as the high-level networking and dynamics of the discussion do. It is the dynamics of these networks that most significantly contribute to the way that opinions are shaped on the Internet and determine whether videos go “viral” and discussions become “flame wars.” As part of the TANEP (Towards an Analytics of Networked Publics) project, the GfK Verein is funding research on methods that can bring these dynamics to visual life and, as a result, reflect the essence of the Internet as a network. The article demonstartes how information is gathered and what it can tell us.
topic Network Analysis
Internet Communications
Online Discourse
Online Communities
Twitter
url http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/gfkmir.2014.6.issue-2/gfkmir-2014-0099/gfkmir-2014-0099.xml?format=INT
work_keys_str_mv AT mairederaxel followtheconnectionsfindingthebigpictureofinternetcommunications
_version_ 1725007626634264576