Body mass index is not associated with donor oocyte recipient success: an ideal study using a paired analysis of sibling-oocytes
Objective: To determine whether a higher body mass index (BMI) adversely affects endometrial receptivity. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Academic medical center. Patient(s): All donor egg recipients (DERs) who received fresh sibling-oocytes (oocytes from a donor that were retrieved fro...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2020-06-01
|
Series: | F&S Reports |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266633412030012X |
id |
doaj-3e0daae5cd1245f6a2b69c6774048b4d |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-3e0daae5cd1245f6a2b69c6774048b4d2021-03-18T04:42:31ZengElsevierF&S Reports2666-33412020-06-01112529Body mass index is not associated with donor oocyte recipient success: an ideal study using a paired analysis of sibling-oocytesRobert Setton, M.D.0Alice Chung, B.A.1Lilli Zimmerman, M.D.2Alexis Melnick, M.D.3Zev Rosenwaks, M.D.4Steven D. Spandorfer, M.D.5The Ronald O. Perelman and Claudia Cohen Center for Reproductive Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New YorkWeill Cornell Medicine, New York, New YorkThe Ronald O. Perelman and Claudia Cohen Center for Reproductive Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New YorkThe Ronald O. Perelman and Claudia Cohen Center for Reproductive Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New YorkThe Ronald O. Perelman and Claudia Cohen Center for Reproductive Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New YorkThe Ronald O. Perelman and Claudia Cohen Center for Reproductive Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York; Reprint requests: Steven D. Spandorfer M.D., The Ronald O. Perelman and Claudia Cohen Center for Reproductive Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, 1305 York Avenue, New York, New York 10021.Objective: To determine whether a higher body mass index (BMI) adversely affects endometrial receptivity. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Academic medical center. Patient(s): All donor egg recipients (DERs) who received fresh sibling-oocytes (oocytes from a donor that were retrieved from a single controlled ovarian hyperstimulation [COH] cycle and split between two recipients) at our center over a 7-year period were included. Intervention(s): COH of a donor with fresh embryo transfer to recipients of differing BMI. The two recipients of the sibling-oocytes were paired and categorized based on BMI: group A (normal weight, BMI 18.5−24.9 kg/m2) and group B (overweight/obese, BMI >25.0 kg/m2). Main Outcome Measure(s): The primary outcome was implantation rate. Secondary outcomes were positive pregnancy rate and live birth rate. Result(s): A total of 408 patients had received oocytes from a split donor oocyte cycle. There were 71 pairs of patients (142 recipients) that had discrepant BMI categories and were analyzed. Implantation rates were similar for the two groups (54.5%±5.3% vs. 56.3%±4.8% for group A and B, respectively, P=0.72). The positive pregnancy rate (77.5% vs. 80.3%, P=0.28) and live birth rate (54.9% vs. 60.6%, P=0.33) for groups A and B were also found to be similar. Conclusion(s): In this idealized model that controls to the greatest degree possible for factors that would impact implantation, we found that a higher BMI did not reduce implantation, positive pregnancy, or delivery rates. These findings suggest that a higher BMI does not adversely affect uterine receptivity.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266633412030012XObesitydonor oocyte recipientsibling-oocytesendometrial receptivity |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Robert Setton, M.D. Alice Chung, B.A. Lilli Zimmerman, M.D. Alexis Melnick, M.D. Zev Rosenwaks, M.D. Steven D. Spandorfer, M.D. |
spellingShingle |
Robert Setton, M.D. Alice Chung, B.A. Lilli Zimmerman, M.D. Alexis Melnick, M.D. Zev Rosenwaks, M.D. Steven D. Spandorfer, M.D. Body mass index is not associated with donor oocyte recipient success: an ideal study using a paired analysis of sibling-oocytes F&S Reports Obesity donor oocyte recipient sibling-oocytes endometrial receptivity |
author_facet |
Robert Setton, M.D. Alice Chung, B.A. Lilli Zimmerman, M.D. Alexis Melnick, M.D. Zev Rosenwaks, M.D. Steven D. Spandorfer, M.D. |
author_sort |
Robert Setton, M.D. |
title |
Body mass index is not associated with donor oocyte recipient success: an ideal study using a paired analysis of sibling-oocytes |
title_short |
Body mass index is not associated with donor oocyte recipient success: an ideal study using a paired analysis of sibling-oocytes |
title_full |
Body mass index is not associated with donor oocyte recipient success: an ideal study using a paired analysis of sibling-oocytes |
title_fullStr |
Body mass index is not associated with donor oocyte recipient success: an ideal study using a paired analysis of sibling-oocytes |
title_full_unstemmed |
Body mass index is not associated with donor oocyte recipient success: an ideal study using a paired analysis of sibling-oocytes |
title_sort |
body mass index is not associated with donor oocyte recipient success: an ideal study using a paired analysis of sibling-oocytes |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
F&S Reports |
issn |
2666-3341 |
publishDate |
2020-06-01 |
description |
Objective: To determine whether a higher body mass index (BMI) adversely affects endometrial receptivity. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Academic medical center. Patient(s): All donor egg recipients (DERs) who received fresh sibling-oocytes (oocytes from a donor that were retrieved from a single controlled ovarian hyperstimulation [COH] cycle and split between two recipients) at our center over a 7-year period were included. Intervention(s): COH of a donor with fresh embryo transfer to recipients of differing BMI. The two recipients of the sibling-oocytes were paired and categorized based on BMI: group A (normal weight, BMI 18.5−24.9 kg/m2) and group B (overweight/obese, BMI >25.0 kg/m2). Main Outcome Measure(s): The primary outcome was implantation rate. Secondary outcomes were positive pregnancy rate and live birth rate. Result(s): A total of 408 patients had received oocytes from a split donor oocyte cycle. There were 71 pairs of patients (142 recipients) that had discrepant BMI categories and were analyzed. Implantation rates were similar for the two groups (54.5%±5.3% vs. 56.3%±4.8% for group A and B, respectively, P=0.72). The positive pregnancy rate (77.5% vs. 80.3%, P=0.28) and live birth rate (54.9% vs. 60.6%, P=0.33) for groups A and B were also found to be similar. Conclusion(s): In this idealized model that controls to the greatest degree possible for factors that would impact implantation, we found that a higher BMI did not reduce implantation, positive pregnancy, or delivery rates. These findings suggest that a higher BMI does not adversely affect uterine receptivity. |
topic |
Obesity donor oocyte recipient sibling-oocytes endometrial receptivity |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266633412030012X |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT robertsettonmd bodymassindexisnotassociatedwithdonoroocyterecipientsuccessanidealstudyusingapairedanalysisofsiblingoocytes AT alicechungba bodymassindexisnotassociatedwithdonoroocyterecipientsuccessanidealstudyusingapairedanalysisofsiblingoocytes AT lillizimmermanmd bodymassindexisnotassociatedwithdonoroocyterecipientsuccessanidealstudyusingapairedanalysisofsiblingoocytes AT alexismelnickmd bodymassindexisnotassociatedwithdonoroocyterecipientsuccessanidealstudyusingapairedanalysisofsiblingoocytes AT zevrosenwaksmd bodymassindexisnotassociatedwithdonoroocyterecipientsuccessanidealstudyusingapairedanalysisofsiblingoocytes AT stevendspandorfermd bodymassindexisnotassociatedwithdonoroocyterecipientsuccessanidealstudyusingapairedanalysisofsiblingoocytes |
_version_ |
1724216609356120064 |