Body mass index is not associated with donor oocyte recipient success: an ideal study using a paired analysis of sibling-oocytes

Objective: To determine whether a higher body mass index (BMI) adversely affects endometrial receptivity. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Academic medical center. Patient(s): All donor egg recipients (DERs) who received fresh sibling-oocytes (oocytes from a donor that were retrieved fro...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Robert Setton, M.D., Alice Chung, B.A., Lilli Zimmerman, M.D., Alexis Melnick, M.D., Zev Rosenwaks, M.D., Steven D. Spandorfer, M.D.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020-06-01
Series:F&S Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266633412030012X
id doaj-3e0daae5cd1245f6a2b69c6774048b4d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3e0daae5cd1245f6a2b69c6774048b4d2021-03-18T04:42:31ZengElsevierF&S Reports2666-33412020-06-01112529Body mass index is not associated with donor oocyte recipient success: an ideal study using a paired analysis of sibling-oocytesRobert Setton, M.D.0Alice Chung, B.A.1Lilli Zimmerman, M.D.2Alexis Melnick, M.D.3Zev Rosenwaks, M.D.4Steven D. Spandorfer, M.D.5The Ronald O. Perelman and Claudia Cohen Center for Reproductive Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New YorkWeill Cornell Medicine, New York, New YorkThe Ronald O. Perelman and Claudia Cohen Center for Reproductive Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New YorkThe Ronald O. Perelman and Claudia Cohen Center for Reproductive Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New YorkThe Ronald O. Perelman and Claudia Cohen Center for Reproductive Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New YorkThe Ronald O. Perelman and Claudia Cohen Center for Reproductive Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York; Reprint requests: Steven D. Spandorfer M.D., The Ronald O. Perelman and Claudia Cohen Center for Reproductive Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, 1305 York Avenue, New York, New York 10021.Objective: To determine whether a higher body mass index (BMI) adversely affects endometrial receptivity. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Academic medical center. Patient(s): All donor egg recipients (DERs) who received fresh sibling-oocytes (oocytes from a donor that were retrieved from a single controlled ovarian hyperstimulation [COH] cycle and split between two recipients) at our center over a 7-year period were included. Intervention(s): COH of a donor with fresh embryo transfer to recipients of differing BMI. The two recipients of the sibling-oocytes were paired and categorized based on BMI: group A (normal weight, BMI 18.5−24.9 kg/m2) and group B (overweight/obese, BMI >25.0 kg/m2). Main Outcome Measure(s): The primary outcome was implantation rate. Secondary outcomes were positive pregnancy rate and live birth rate. Result(s): A total of 408 patients had received oocytes from a split donor oocyte cycle. There were 71 pairs of patients (142 recipients) that had discrepant BMI categories and were analyzed. Implantation rates were similar for the two groups (54.5%±5.3% vs. 56.3%±4.8% for group A and B, respectively, P=0.72). The positive pregnancy rate (77.5% vs. 80.3%, P=0.28) and live birth rate (54.9% vs. 60.6%, P=0.33) for groups A and B were also found to be similar. Conclusion(s): In this idealized model that controls to the greatest degree possible for factors that would impact implantation, we found that a higher BMI did not reduce implantation, positive pregnancy, or delivery rates. These findings suggest that a higher BMI does not adversely affect uterine receptivity.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266633412030012XObesitydonor oocyte recipientsibling-oocytesendometrial receptivity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Robert Setton, M.D.
Alice Chung, B.A.
Lilli Zimmerman, M.D.
Alexis Melnick, M.D.
Zev Rosenwaks, M.D.
Steven D. Spandorfer, M.D.
spellingShingle Robert Setton, M.D.
Alice Chung, B.A.
Lilli Zimmerman, M.D.
Alexis Melnick, M.D.
Zev Rosenwaks, M.D.
Steven D. Spandorfer, M.D.
Body mass index is not associated with donor oocyte recipient success: an ideal study using a paired analysis of sibling-oocytes
F&S Reports
Obesity
donor oocyte recipient
sibling-oocytes
endometrial receptivity
author_facet Robert Setton, M.D.
Alice Chung, B.A.
Lilli Zimmerman, M.D.
Alexis Melnick, M.D.
Zev Rosenwaks, M.D.
Steven D. Spandorfer, M.D.
author_sort Robert Setton, M.D.
title Body mass index is not associated with donor oocyte recipient success: an ideal study using a paired analysis of sibling-oocytes
title_short Body mass index is not associated with donor oocyte recipient success: an ideal study using a paired analysis of sibling-oocytes
title_full Body mass index is not associated with donor oocyte recipient success: an ideal study using a paired analysis of sibling-oocytes
title_fullStr Body mass index is not associated with donor oocyte recipient success: an ideal study using a paired analysis of sibling-oocytes
title_full_unstemmed Body mass index is not associated with donor oocyte recipient success: an ideal study using a paired analysis of sibling-oocytes
title_sort body mass index is not associated with donor oocyte recipient success: an ideal study using a paired analysis of sibling-oocytes
publisher Elsevier
series F&S Reports
issn 2666-3341
publishDate 2020-06-01
description Objective: To determine whether a higher body mass index (BMI) adversely affects endometrial receptivity. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Academic medical center. Patient(s): All donor egg recipients (DERs) who received fresh sibling-oocytes (oocytes from a donor that were retrieved from a single controlled ovarian hyperstimulation [COH] cycle and split between two recipients) at our center over a 7-year period were included. Intervention(s): COH of a donor with fresh embryo transfer to recipients of differing BMI. The two recipients of the sibling-oocytes were paired and categorized based on BMI: group A (normal weight, BMI 18.5−24.9 kg/m2) and group B (overweight/obese, BMI >25.0 kg/m2). Main Outcome Measure(s): The primary outcome was implantation rate. Secondary outcomes were positive pregnancy rate and live birth rate. Result(s): A total of 408 patients had received oocytes from a split donor oocyte cycle. There were 71 pairs of patients (142 recipients) that had discrepant BMI categories and were analyzed. Implantation rates were similar for the two groups (54.5%±5.3% vs. 56.3%±4.8% for group A and B, respectively, P=0.72). The positive pregnancy rate (77.5% vs. 80.3%, P=0.28) and live birth rate (54.9% vs. 60.6%, P=0.33) for groups A and B were also found to be similar. Conclusion(s): In this idealized model that controls to the greatest degree possible for factors that would impact implantation, we found that a higher BMI did not reduce implantation, positive pregnancy, or delivery rates. These findings suggest that a higher BMI does not adversely affect uterine receptivity.
topic Obesity
donor oocyte recipient
sibling-oocytes
endometrial receptivity
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266633412030012X
work_keys_str_mv AT robertsettonmd bodymassindexisnotassociatedwithdonoroocyterecipientsuccessanidealstudyusingapairedanalysisofsiblingoocytes
AT alicechungba bodymassindexisnotassociatedwithdonoroocyterecipientsuccessanidealstudyusingapairedanalysisofsiblingoocytes
AT lillizimmermanmd bodymassindexisnotassociatedwithdonoroocyterecipientsuccessanidealstudyusingapairedanalysisofsiblingoocytes
AT alexismelnickmd bodymassindexisnotassociatedwithdonoroocyterecipientsuccessanidealstudyusingapairedanalysisofsiblingoocytes
AT zevrosenwaksmd bodymassindexisnotassociatedwithdonoroocyterecipientsuccessanidealstudyusingapairedanalysisofsiblingoocytes
AT stevendspandorfermd bodymassindexisnotassociatedwithdonoroocyterecipientsuccessanidealstudyusingapairedanalysisofsiblingoocytes
_version_ 1724216609356120064