Bioethics networks and reproduction technologies: theoretical and methodological controversies - DOI: 10.3395/reciis.v1i2.87en
The object of this paper is to discuss some of the theoretical and methodological controversies surrounding the emerging field of bioethics, especially focusing on reproduction biotechnologies, attempting to give some examples of its implications as a network of controversies. Initially, it presents...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Instituto de Comunicação e Informação Científica e Tecnológica em Saúde (Icict) da Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz)
2007-12-01
|
Series: | RECIIS |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.reciis.cict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciis/article/view/87/86 |
id |
doaj-3e0cf121824c4e94bec5a0248a7f9b16 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-3e0cf121824c4e94bec5a0248a7f9b162021-05-02T02:07:48ZengInstituto de Comunicação e Informação Científica e Tecnológica em Saúde (Icict) da Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz)RECIIS1981-62782007-12-0112222231Bioethics networks and reproduction technologies: theoretical and methodological controversies - DOI: 10.3395/reciis.v1i2.87enRosa Maria Leite PedroJúlio Cesar de Almeida NobreThe object of this paper is to discuss some of the theoretical and methodological controversies surrounding the emerging field of bioethics, especially focusing on reproduction biotechnologies, attempting to give some examples of its implications as a network of controversies. Initially, it presents the new reproduction biotechnologies in terms of the effect which they are producing on our understanding about human nature and life, as well as the context of the emergence of bioethics, traditionally conceived of as a critical and analytical example of the relationship between technology and humanity. As an alternative way of explaining these relationships, it outlines the aspect of bioethics as a network effect, in which the technology-society hybrid is shown both in the building of bioethical norms and in the instabilities which challenge these norms. As a way of understanding this heterogeneous and complex network, Controversy Analysis is proposed as a methodological tool. In order to illustrate the richness of such perspective, a brief empirical study is presented, in which an attempt is made to track controversies articulated around the relations between bioethics and reproduction biotechnologies, with a specific focus on stem cell research, as published by the on-line media from January of 2004 until July of 2006, raising questions about subjects such as: life, humanity, artifice and autonomy.http://www.reciis.cict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciis/article/view/87/86Bioethicsreproduction biotechnologiesnetworkscontroversy |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Rosa Maria Leite Pedro Júlio Cesar de Almeida Nobre |
spellingShingle |
Rosa Maria Leite Pedro Júlio Cesar de Almeida Nobre Bioethics networks and reproduction technologies: theoretical and methodological controversies - DOI: 10.3395/reciis.v1i2.87en RECIIS Bioethics reproduction biotechnologies networks controversy |
author_facet |
Rosa Maria Leite Pedro Júlio Cesar de Almeida Nobre |
author_sort |
Rosa Maria Leite Pedro |
title |
Bioethics networks and reproduction technologies: theoretical and methodological controversies - DOI: 10.3395/reciis.v1i2.87en |
title_short |
Bioethics networks and reproduction technologies: theoretical and methodological controversies - DOI: 10.3395/reciis.v1i2.87en |
title_full |
Bioethics networks and reproduction technologies: theoretical and methodological controversies - DOI: 10.3395/reciis.v1i2.87en |
title_fullStr |
Bioethics networks and reproduction technologies: theoretical and methodological controversies - DOI: 10.3395/reciis.v1i2.87en |
title_full_unstemmed |
Bioethics networks and reproduction technologies: theoretical and methodological controversies - DOI: 10.3395/reciis.v1i2.87en |
title_sort |
bioethics networks and reproduction technologies: theoretical and methodological controversies - doi: 10.3395/reciis.v1i2.87en |
publisher |
Instituto de Comunicação e Informação Científica e Tecnológica em Saúde (Icict) da Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz) |
series |
RECIIS |
issn |
1981-6278 |
publishDate |
2007-12-01 |
description |
The object of this paper is to discuss some of the theoretical and methodological controversies surrounding the emerging field of bioethics, especially focusing on reproduction biotechnologies, attempting to give some examples of its implications as a network of controversies. Initially, it presents the new reproduction biotechnologies in terms of the effect which they are producing on our understanding about human nature and life, as well as the context of the emergence of bioethics, traditionally conceived of as a critical and analytical example of the relationship between technology and humanity. As an alternative way of explaining these relationships, it outlines the aspect of bioethics as a network effect, in which the technology-society hybrid is shown both in the building of bioethical norms and in the instabilities which challenge these norms. As a way of understanding this heterogeneous and complex network, Controversy Analysis is proposed as a methodological tool. In order to illustrate the richness of such perspective, a brief empirical study is presented, in which an attempt is made to track controversies articulated around the relations between bioethics and reproduction biotechnologies, with a specific focus on stem cell research, as published by the on-line media from January of 2004 until July of 2006, raising questions about subjects such as: life, humanity, artifice and autonomy. |
topic |
Bioethics reproduction biotechnologies networks controversy |
url |
http://www.reciis.cict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciis/article/view/87/86 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT rosamarialeitepedro bioethicsnetworksandreproductiontechnologiestheoreticalandmethodologicalcontroversiesdoi103395reciisv1i287en AT juliocesardealmeidanobre bioethicsnetworksandreproductiontechnologiestheoreticalandmethodologicalcontroversiesdoi103395reciisv1i287en |
_version_ |
1721496260675895296 |