An example of Romanian case law on the digital right to be forgotten

An example of Romanian case law on the digital right to be forgotten

After CJEU’s decision in the case C‑ 131/12, Google Spain and Inc., the national courts of the Member States have begun to rule on litigations on the digital right to be forgotten. Romanian courts were no exception regarding this new right of the data subjects. As such, this article aims to provide...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: S.-D. ȘCHIOPU
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Transilvania University of Brasov Publishing House 2018-07-01
Series:Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Braşov: Series VII: Social Sciences, Law
Subjects:
data protection
right to be forgotten
right to digital oblivion
right to be delisted
right to de-indexing
Directive 95/46/EC
Online Access:http://webbut.unitbv.ro/Bulletin/Series%20VII/2018/BULETIN%20I%20PDF/23%20%C8%98chiopu%20.pdf
id doaj-3e0c3bfd91a9496397158c9732d562c1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3e0c3bfd91a9496397158c9732d562c12020-11-25T00:45:15ZengTransilvania University of Brasov Publishing HouseBulletin of the Transilvania University of Braşov: Series VII: Social Sciences, Law2066-77012066-771X2018-07-0111(60)1175180An example of Romanian case law on the digital right to be forgottenS.-D. ȘCHIOPU0Transilvania University of Braşov, RomaniaAfter CJEU’s decision in the case C‑ 131/12, Google Spain and Inc., the national courts of the Member States have begun to rule on litigations on the digital right to be forgotten. Romanian courts were no exception regarding this new right of the data subjects. As such, this article aims to provide an example of the Romanian case law which involves a data subject who played a role in public life and the information in question was at the boundary between public and private life. In these circumstances, the Court has concluded that for its decision two aspects are essential, namely if the data is accurate and has actual relevance, and based the ruling on their analysis. This ruling might not be the most relevant one but it offers a glimpse into the Romanian case law on the digital right to be forgotten.http://webbut.unitbv.ro/Bulletin/Series%20VII/2018/BULETIN%20I%20PDF/23%20%C8%98chiopu%20.pdfdata protectionright to be forgottenright to digital oblivionright to be delistedright to de-indexingDirective 95/46/EC
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author S.-D. ȘCHIOPU
spellingShingle S.-D. ȘCHIOPU
An example of Romanian case law on the digital right to be forgotten
Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Braşov: Series VII: Social Sciences, Law
data protection
right to be forgotten
right to digital oblivion
right to be delisted
right to de-indexing
Directive 95/46/EC
author_facet S.-D. ȘCHIOPU
author_sort S.-D. ȘCHIOPU
title An example of Romanian case law on the digital right to be forgotten
title_short An example of Romanian case law on the digital right to be forgotten
title_full An example of Romanian case law on the digital right to be forgotten
title_fullStr An example of Romanian case law on the digital right to be forgotten
title_full_unstemmed An example of Romanian case law on the digital right to be forgotten
title_sort example of romanian case law on the digital right to be forgotten
publisher Transilvania University of Brasov Publishing House
series Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Braşov: Series VII: Social Sciences, Law
issn 2066-7701
2066-771X
publishDate 2018-07-01
description After CJEU’s decision in the case C‑ 131/12, Google Spain and Inc., the national courts of the Member States have begun to rule on litigations on the digital right to be forgotten. Romanian courts were no exception regarding this new right of the data subjects. As such, this article aims to provide an example of the Romanian case law which involves a data subject who played a role in public life and the information in question was at the boundary between public and private life. In these circumstances, the Court has concluded that for its decision two aspects are essential, namely if the data is accurate and has actual relevance, and based the ruling on their analysis. This ruling might not be the most relevant one but it offers a glimpse into the Romanian case law on the digital right to be forgotten.
topic data protection
right to be forgotten
right to digital oblivion
right to be delisted
right to de-indexing
Directive 95/46/EC
url http://webbut.unitbv.ro/Bulletin/Series%20VII/2018/BULETIN%20I%20PDF/23%20%C8%98chiopu%20.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT sdschiopu anexampleofromaniancaselawonthedigitalrighttobeforgotten
AT sdschiopu exampleofromaniancaselawonthedigitalrighttobeforgotten
_version_ 1725271202921971712

Similar Items