Autonomous Weapons in Humanitarian Law: Understanding the Technology, Its Compliance with the Principle of Proportionality and the Role of Utilitarianism

Autonomous machines are moving rapidly from science fiction to science fact. The defining feature of this technology is that it can operate independently of human control. Consequently, society must consider how ‘decisions’ are to be made by autonomous machines. The matter is particularly acute in c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Elliot Winter
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Groningen Press 2018-08-01
Series:Groningen Journal of International Law
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ugp.rug.nl/GROJIL/article/view/32080
id doaj-3e0c394a0c2c474b9b60abe63fa7e9bf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3e0c394a0c2c474b9b60abe63fa7e9bf2021-08-24T12:12:10ZengUniversity of Groningen PressGroningen Journal of International Law2352-26742018-08-016118320210.21827/5b51d56abd19e22011Autonomous Weapons in Humanitarian Law: Understanding the Technology, Its Compliance with the Principle of Proportionality and the Role of UtilitarianismElliot WinterAutonomous machines are moving rapidly from science fiction to science fact. The defining feature of this technology is that it can operate independently of human control. Consequently, society must consider how ‘decisions’ are to be made by autonomous machines. The matter is particularly acute in circumstances where harm is inevitable no matter what course of action is taken. This dilemma has been identified in the context of autonomous vehicles driving under the regulation of domestic law and, there, governments seem to be moving towards a utilitarian solution to inevitable harm. This leads one to question whether utilitarianism should be transposed into the context of autonomous weapons which might soon operate on the battlefield under the gaze of humanitarian law. The argument here is that it should because humanitarian law includes the core principle of ‘proportionality’, which is fundamentally a utilitarian concept – requiring that any gain derived from an attack outweighs the harm caused. However, while human soldiers are always able to come to a view on proportionality, albeit subjective, there is much doubt over how an autonomous weapon might determine what is proportionate. There is a very large gap between our embryonic understanding of utilitarianism in relation to autonomous vehicles manoeuvring around a city on one hand; and what would be required for armed robots patrolling a battlespace on the other. Bridging this gap is fraught with difficulty but perhaps the best starting point is to take Bentham’s expression of utilitarian mechanics and build upon them. With conscious effort and, ideally, collaboration, states could use the process of applying his classic theory to this very modern problem to raise the standard of protection offered to those caught up in conflict.https://ugp.rug.nl/GROJIL/article/view/32080international humanitarian lawlaw of armed conflictdisarmamentlethal autonomous weaponsautonomous vehiclesproportionalityutilitarianismbentham
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Elliot Winter
spellingShingle Elliot Winter
Autonomous Weapons in Humanitarian Law: Understanding the Technology, Its Compliance with the Principle of Proportionality and the Role of Utilitarianism
Groningen Journal of International Law
international humanitarian law
law of armed conflict
disarmament
lethal autonomous weapons
autonomous vehicles
proportionality
utilitarianism
bentham
author_facet Elliot Winter
author_sort Elliot Winter
title Autonomous Weapons in Humanitarian Law: Understanding the Technology, Its Compliance with the Principle of Proportionality and the Role of Utilitarianism
title_short Autonomous Weapons in Humanitarian Law: Understanding the Technology, Its Compliance with the Principle of Proportionality and the Role of Utilitarianism
title_full Autonomous Weapons in Humanitarian Law: Understanding the Technology, Its Compliance with the Principle of Proportionality and the Role of Utilitarianism
title_fullStr Autonomous Weapons in Humanitarian Law: Understanding the Technology, Its Compliance with the Principle of Proportionality and the Role of Utilitarianism
title_full_unstemmed Autonomous Weapons in Humanitarian Law: Understanding the Technology, Its Compliance with the Principle of Proportionality and the Role of Utilitarianism
title_sort autonomous weapons in humanitarian law: understanding the technology, its compliance with the principle of proportionality and the role of utilitarianism
publisher University of Groningen Press
series Groningen Journal of International Law
issn 2352-2674
publishDate 2018-08-01
description Autonomous machines are moving rapidly from science fiction to science fact. The defining feature of this technology is that it can operate independently of human control. Consequently, society must consider how ‘decisions’ are to be made by autonomous machines. The matter is particularly acute in circumstances where harm is inevitable no matter what course of action is taken. This dilemma has been identified in the context of autonomous vehicles driving under the regulation of domestic law and, there, governments seem to be moving towards a utilitarian solution to inevitable harm. This leads one to question whether utilitarianism should be transposed into the context of autonomous weapons which might soon operate on the battlefield under the gaze of humanitarian law. The argument here is that it should because humanitarian law includes the core principle of ‘proportionality’, which is fundamentally a utilitarian concept – requiring that any gain derived from an attack outweighs the harm caused. However, while human soldiers are always able to come to a view on proportionality, albeit subjective, there is much doubt over how an autonomous weapon might determine what is proportionate. There is a very large gap between our embryonic understanding of utilitarianism in relation to autonomous vehicles manoeuvring around a city on one hand; and what would be required for armed robots patrolling a battlespace on the other. Bridging this gap is fraught with difficulty but perhaps the best starting point is to take Bentham’s expression of utilitarian mechanics and build upon them. With conscious effort and, ideally, collaboration, states could use the process of applying his classic theory to this very modern problem to raise the standard of protection offered to those caught up in conflict.
topic international humanitarian law
law of armed conflict
disarmament
lethal autonomous weapons
autonomous vehicles
proportionality
utilitarianism
bentham
url https://ugp.rug.nl/GROJIL/article/view/32080
work_keys_str_mv AT elliotwinter autonomousweaponsinhumanitarianlawunderstandingthetechnologyitscompliancewiththeprincipleofproportionalityandtheroleofutilitarianism
_version_ 1721197569082654720