Discrimination between Modal, Breathy and Pressed Voice for Single Vowels Using Neck-Surface Vibration Signals
The purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility of using neck-surface acceleration signals to discriminate between modal, breathy and pressed voice. Voice data for five English single vowels were collected from 31 female native Canadian English speakers using a portable Neck Surface Acc...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2019-04-01
|
Series: | Applied Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/9/7/1505 |
id |
doaj-3dfb699bc372457a93fbfe5589f415cd |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-3dfb699bc372457a93fbfe5589f415cd2020-11-24T22:19:07ZengMDPI AGApplied Sciences2076-34172019-04-0197150510.3390/app9071505app9071505Discrimination between Modal, Breathy and Pressed Voice for Single Vowels Using Neck-Surface Vibration SignalsZhengdong Lei0Evan Kennedy1Laura Fasanella2Nicole Yee-Key Li-Jessen3Luc Mongeau4Department of Mechanical Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 0G4, CanadaSchool of Communication Sciences and Disorders, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 0G4, CanadaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 0G4, CanadaSchool of Communication Sciences and Disorders, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 0G4, CanadaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 0G4, CanadaThe purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility of using neck-surface acceleration signals to discriminate between modal, breathy and pressed voice. Voice data for five English single vowels were collected from 31 female native Canadian English speakers using a portable Neck Surface Accelerometer (NSA) and a condenser microphone. Firstly, auditory-perceptual ratings were conducted by five clinically-certificated Speech Language Pathologists (SLPs) to categorize voice type using the audio recordings. Intra- and inter-rater analyses were used to determine the SLPs’ reliability for the perceptual categorization task. Mixed-type samples were screened out, and congruent samples were kept for the subsequent classification task. Secondly, features such as spectral harmonics, jitter, shimmer and spectral entropy were extracted from the NSA data. Supervised learning algorithms were used to map feature vectors to voice type categories. A feature wrapper strategy was used to evaluate the contribution of each feature or feature combinations to the classification between different voice types. The results showed that the highest classification accuracy on a full set was 82.5%. The breathy voice classification accuracy was notably greater (approximately 12%) than those of the other two voice types. Shimmer and spectral entropy were the best correlated metrics for the classification accuracy.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/9/7/1505neck-surface vibrationmachine learningvoice type discrimination |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Zhengdong Lei Evan Kennedy Laura Fasanella Nicole Yee-Key Li-Jessen Luc Mongeau |
spellingShingle |
Zhengdong Lei Evan Kennedy Laura Fasanella Nicole Yee-Key Li-Jessen Luc Mongeau Discrimination between Modal, Breathy and Pressed Voice for Single Vowels Using Neck-Surface Vibration Signals Applied Sciences neck-surface vibration machine learning voice type discrimination |
author_facet |
Zhengdong Lei Evan Kennedy Laura Fasanella Nicole Yee-Key Li-Jessen Luc Mongeau |
author_sort |
Zhengdong Lei |
title |
Discrimination between Modal, Breathy and Pressed Voice for Single Vowels Using Neck-Surface Vibration Signals |
title_short |
Discrimination between Modal, Breathy and Pressed Voice for Single Vowels Using Neck-Surface Vibration Signals |
title_full |
Discrimination between Modal, Breathy and Pressed Voice for Single Vowels Using Neck-Surface Vibration Signals |
title_fullStr |
Discrimination between Modal, Breathy and Pressed Voice for Single Vowels Using Neck-Surface Vibration Signals |
title_full_unstemmed |
Discrimination between Modal, Breathy and Pressed Voice for Single Vowels Using Neck-Surface Vibration Signals |
title_sort |
discrimination between modal, breathy and pressed voice for single vowels using neck-surface vibration signals |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Applied Sciences |
issn |
2076-3417 |
publishDate |
2019-04-01 |
description |
The purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility of using neck-surface acceleration signals to discriminate between modal, breathy and pressed voice. Voice data for five English single vowels were collected from 31 female native Canadian English speakers using a portable Neck Surface Accelerometer (NSA) and a condenser microphone. Firstly, auditory-perceptual ratings were conducted by five clinically-certificated Speech Language Pathologists (SLPs) to categorize voice type using the audio recordings. Intra- and inter-rater analyses were used to determine the SLPs’ reliability for the perceptual categorization task. Mixed-type samples were screened out, and congruent samples were kept for the subsequent classification task. Secondly, features such as spectral harmonics, jitter, shimmer and spectral entropy were extracted from the NSA data. Supervised learning algorithms were used to map feature vectors to voice type categories. A feature wrapper strategy was used to evaluate the contribution of each feature or feature combinations to the classification between different voice types. The results showed that the highest classification accuracy on a full set was 82.5%. The breathy voice classification accuracy was notably greater (approximately 12%) than those of the other two voice types. Shimmer and spectral entropy were the best correlated metrics for the classification accuracy. |
topic |
neck-surface vibration machine learning voice type discrimination |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/9/7/1505 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT zhengdonglei discriminationbetweenmodalbreathyandpressedvoiceforsinglevowelsusingnecksurfacevibrationsignals AT evankennedy discriminationbetweenmodalbreathyandpressedvoiceforsinglevowelsusingnecksurfacevibrationsignals AT laurafasanella discriminationbetweenmodalbreathyandpressedvoiceforsinglevowelsusingnecksurfacevibrationsignals AT nicoleyeekeylijessen discriminationbetweenmodalbreathyandpressedvoiceforsinglevowelsusingnecksurfacevibrationsignals AT lucmongeau discriminationbetweenmodalbreathyandpressedvoiceforsinglevowelsusingnecksurfacevibrationsignals |
_version_ |
1725779943858634752 |