| Summary: | The second law of thermodynamics, with its positive change of entropy for a system not in equilibrium, defines an arrow of time. Interestingly, also, causality, which is the connection between a cause and an effect, requests a direction of time by definition. It is noted that no other standard physical theories show this property. It is the attempt of this work to connect causality with entropy, which is possible by defining time as the metric of causality. Under this consideration that time appears only through a cause–effect relationship (“measured”, typically, in an apparatus called clock), it is demonstrated that time must be discrete in nature and cannot be continuous as assumed in all standard theories of physics including general and special relativity, and classical physics. The following lines of reasoning include: (i) (mechanical) causality requests that the cause must precede its effect (i.e., antecedence) requesting a discrete time interval > 0. (ii) An infinitely small time step <inline-formula> <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mi>d</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mo>></mo> <mn>0</mn> </mrow> </semantics> </math> </inline-formula> is thereby not sufficient to distinguish between cause and effect as a mathematical relationship between the two (i.e., Poisson bracket) will commute at a time interval <inline-formula> <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mi>d</mi> <mi>t</mi> </mrow> </semantics> </math> </inline-formula>, while not evidently within discrete time steps <inline-formula> <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mi>Δ</mi> <mi>t</mi> </mrow> </semantics> </math> </inline-formula>. As a consequence of a discrete time, entropy emerges (Riek, 2014) connecting causality and entropy to each other.
|
|---|
