An evaluation of the 360@ project management competency assessment questionnaire

The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate a 360@ project management competency questionnaire relevant to a chemical engineering environment. The competency questionnaire was developed using the input of the employees who took part in the appraisal. The secondary purpose of this study was to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: D. Theron, G. Roodt
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AOSIS 2001-12-01
Series:SA Journal of Industrial Psychology
Online Access:https://sajip.co.za/index.php/sajip/article/view/786
id doaj-3ddc7b477e364b9a987a335f3c372c34
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3ddc7b477e364b9a987a335f3c372c342020-11-24T22:44:03ZengAOSISSA Journal of Industrial Psychology0258-52002071-07632001-12-01272515610.4102/sajip.v27i2.786722An evaluation of the 360@ project management competency assessment questionnaireD. TheronG. RoodtThe primary purpose of this study was to evaluate a 360@ project management competency questionnaire relevant to a chemical engineering environment. The competency questionnaire was developed using the input of the employees who took part in the appraisal. The secondary purpose of this study was to determine if significant differences existed between the multi-rater competency evaluations of different rater groups. Opsomming Die primere doel van hierdie studie was om 'n 360@ projekbestuurbevoegdheidsvraelys binne 'n chemise ingenieurswese-omgewing te evalueer. Die bevoegdheidsvraelys is ontwikkel deur gebruik te maak van die insette van die werknemers wat deelgeneem het aan die beoordeling. Die sekondere doel van die studie was om te bepaal of daar beduidende verskille bestaan tussen die multibeoordelaarbevoegdheidsevaluerings van verskillen- de beoordelaarsgroepe.https://sajip.co.za/index.php/sajip/article/view/786
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author D. Theron
G. Roodt
spellingShingle D. Theron
G. Roodt
An evaluation of the 360@ project management competency assessment questionnaire
SA Journal of Industrial Psychology
author_facet D. Theron
G. Roodt
author_sort D. Theron
title An evaluation of the 360@ project management competency assessment questionnaire
title_short An evaluation of the 360@ project management competency assessment questionnaire
title_full An evaluation of the 360@ project management competency assessment questionnaire
title_fullStr An evaluation of the 360@ project management competency assessment questionnaire
title_full_unstemmed An evaluation of the 360@ project management competency assessment questionnaire
title_sort evaluation of the 360@ project management competency assessment questionnaire
publisher AOSIS
series SA Journal of Industrial Psychology
issn 0258-5200
2071-0763
publishDate 2001-12-01
description The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate a 360@ project management competency questionnaire relevant to a chemical engineering environment. The competency questionnaire was developed using the input of the employees who took part in the appraisal. The secondary purpose of this study was to determine if significant differences existed between the multi-rater competency evaluations of different rater groups. Opsomming Die primere doel van hierdie studie was om 'n 360@ projekbestuurbevoegdheidsvraelys binne 'n chemise ingenieurswese-omgewing te evalueer. Die bevoegdheidsvraelys is ontwikkel deur gebruik te maak van die insette van die werknemers wat deelgeneem het aan die beoordeling. Die sekondere doel van die studie was om te bepaal of daar beduidende verskille bestaan tussen die multibeoordelaarbevoegdheidsevaluerings van verskillen- de beoordelaarsgroepe.
url https://sajip.co.za/index.php/sajip/article/view/786
work_keys_str_mv AT dtheron anevaluationofthe360projectmanagementcompetencyassessmentquestionnaire
AT groodt anevaluationofthe360projectmanagementcompetencyassessmentquestionnaire
AT dtheron evaluationofthe360projectmanagementcompetencyassessmentquestionnaire
AT groodt evaluationofthe360projectmanagementcompetencyassessmentquestionnaire
_version_ 1725693085845815296