Transitivity in natural syntax : ergative languages

The paper implements the framework of Natural Syntax and treats various phenomena bearing on transitivity using the language material of ergative languages. In each case one ergative and one antipassive constructions are compared, and certain properties of such pairs are predicted. It is new in the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Janez Orešnik
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Znanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete Univerze v Ljubljani (Ljubljana University Press, Faculty of Arts) 2009-12-01
Series:Linguistica
Subjects:
Online Access:https://revije.ff.uni-lj.si/linguistica/article/view/3555
id doaj-3dd461742c654650b548d1fe526e20ad
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3dd461742c654650b548d1fe526e20ad2020-11-24T22:07:43ZdeuZnanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete Univerze v Ljubljani (Ljubljana University Press, Faculty of Arts)Linguistica0024-39222350-420X2009-12-0149110.4312/linguistica.49.1.65-933183Transitivity in natural syntax : ergative languagesJanez Orešnik0University of LjubljanaThe paper implements the framework of Natural Syntax and treats various phenomena bearing on transitivity using the language material of ergative languages. In each case one ergative and one antipassive constructions are compared, and certain properties of such pairs are predicted. It is new in the paper that it is necessary to distinguish less or more transitive antipassive constructions. In the more transitive ones the agent and the patient are coded with the ergative case, the absolutive case, the nominative case, or the patient is integrated (at least to some extent) into the corresponding verb. More transitive antipassive constructions and the corresponding ergative constructions remain transitive. Because transitivity represents an unnatural environment, the alignment of the corresponding naturalness values is chiastic. The remaining antipassive constructions are less transitive, so that any pair consisting of such a construction and of the corresponding ergative construction withdraws from the unnatural environment of transitivity, and hence the alignment of the corresponding naturalness values is parallel. Another unnatural environment is represented by the patient just in case that its syntactic, not semantic, properties are treated. Consequently the alignment of the corresponding naturalness values ischiastic. The paper discusses 18 ergative languages, mostly from the Caucasus and the Pacific Ocean.https://revije.ff.uni-lj.si/linguistica/article/view/3555Transitivity in natural syntaxergative languages
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Janez Orešnik
spellingShingle Janez Orešnik
Transitivity in natural syntax : ergative languages
Linguistica
Transitivity in natural syntax
ergative languages
author_facet Janez Orešnik
author_sort Janez Orešnik
title Transitivity in natural syntax : ergative languages
title_short Transitivity in natural syntax : ergative languages
title_full Transitivity in natural syntax : ergative languages
title_fullStr Transitivity in natural syntax : ergative languages
title_full_unstemmed Transitivity in natural syntax : ergative languages
title_sort transitivity in natural syntax : ergative languages
publisher Znanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete Univerze v Ljubljani (Ljubljana University Press, Faculty of Arts)
series Linguistica
issn 0024-3922
2350-420X
publishDate 2009-12-01
description The paper implements the framework of Natural Syntax and treats various phenomena bearing on transitivity using the language material of ergative languages. In each case one ergative and one antipassive constructions are compared, and certain properties of such pairs are predicted. It is new in the paper that it is necessary to distinguish less or more transitive antipassive constructions. In the more transitive ones the agent and the patient are coded with the ergative case, the absolutive case, the nominative case, or the patient is integrated (at least to some extent) into the corresponding verb. More transitive antipassive constructions and the corresponding ergative constructions remain transitive. Because transitivity represents an unnatural environment, the alignment of the corresponding naturalness values is chiastic. The remaining antipassive constructions are less transitive, so that any pair consisting of such a construction and of the corresponding ergative construction withdraws from the unnatural environment of transitivity, and hence the alignment of the corresponding naturalness values is parallel. Another unnatural environment is represented by the patient just in case that its syntactic, not semantic, properties are treated. Consequently the alignment of the corresponding naturalness values ischiastic. The paper discusses 18 ergative languages, mostly from the Caucasus and the Pacific Ocean.
topic Transitivity in natural syntax
ergative languages
url https://revije.ff.uni-lj.si/linguistica/article/view/3555
work_keys_str_mv AT janezoresnik transitivityinnaturalsyntaxergativelanguages
_version_ 1725818957456211968