The Vérard et al. (2015) method for 3D palaeogeographic reconstructions: How solid is its base?

Veacute;rard and co-workers proposed in an earlier issue of this journal a method to reconstruct the 3D palaeogeography “anywhere in the world at any time”. The present contribution is a discussion of some of the assumptions on which the method of Veacute;rard et al. is based. The reason for this di...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: A.J. (Tom) van Loon
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2015-07-01
Series:Journal of Palaeogeography
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095383615000048
id doaj-3dc6931b33eb413ab3ccd5f9aa48cbdb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3dc6931b33eb413ab3ccd5f9aa48cbdb2020-11-25T02:03:10ZengSpringerOpenJournal of Palaeogeography2095-38362015-07-014324424710.1016/j.jop.2015.08.003The Vérard et al. (2015) method for 3D palaeogeographic reconstructions: How solid is its base?A.J. (Tom) van LoonVeacute;rard and co-workers proposed in an earlier issue of this journal a method to reconstruct the 3D palaeogeography “anywhere in the world at any time”. The present contribution is a discussion of some of the assumptions on which the method of Veacute;rard et al. is based. The reason for this discussion is that the method will give, at least seemingly, illogical outcomes for numerous situations. Moreover, some assumptions used by Veacute;rard and his team pose theoretical problems. It is deduced that the method developed by Veacute;rard and co-workers may occasionally help, indeed, to obtain a rough picture of the altitude of the sedimentary surface on the continents and of the depth of the sedimentary surface in the oceans in the geological past. The outcomes should, however, be treated with utmost care as several of the assumptions on which the interpretative 3D method is based have no solid basis, so that even the rough outcomes of the method must be considered questionable.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095383615000048palaeogeographyreconstruction3D model
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author A.J. (Tom) van Loon
spellingShingle A.J. (Tom) van Loon
The Vérard et al. (2015) method for 3D palaeogeographic reconstructions: How solid is its base?
Journal of Palaeogeography
palaeogeography
reconstruction
3D model
author_facet A.J. (Tom) van Loon
author_sort A.J. (Tom) van Loon
title The Vérard et al. (2015) method for 3D palaeogeographic reconstructions: How solid is its base?
title_short The Vérard et al. (2015) method for 3D palaeogeographic reconstructions: How solid is its base?
title_full The Vérard et al. (2015) method for 3D palaeogeographic reconstructions: How solid is its base?
title_fullStr The Vérard et al. (2015) method for 3D palaeogeographic reconstructions: How solid is its base?
title_full_unstemmed The Vérard et al. (2015) method for 3D palaeogeographic reconstructions: How solid is its base?
title_sort vérard et al. (2015) method for 3d palaeogeographic reconstructions: how solid is its base?
publisher SpringerOpen
series Journal of Palaeogeography
issn 2095-3836
publishDate 2015-07-01
description Veacute;rard and co-workers proposed in an earlier issue of this journal a method to reconstruct the 3D palaeogeography “anywhere in the world at any time”. The present contribution is a discussion of some of the assumptions on which the method of Veacute;rard et al. is based. The reason for this discussion is that the method will give, at least seemingly, illogical outcomes for numerous situations. Moreover, some assumptions used by Veacute;rard and his team pose theoretical problems. It is deduced that the method developed by Veacute;rard and co-workers may occasionally help, indeed, to obtain a rough picture of the altitude of the sedimentary surface on the continents and of the depth of the sedimentary surface in the oceans in the geological past. The outcomes should, however, be treated with utmost care as several of the assumptions on which the interpretative 3D method is based have no solid basis, so that even the rough outcomes of the method must be considered questionable.
topic palaeogeography
reconstruction
3D model
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095383615000048
work_keys_str_mv AT ajtomvanloon theverardetal2015methodfor3dpalaeogeographicreconstructionshowsolidisitsbase
AT ajtomvanloon verardetal2015methodfor3dpalaeogeographicreconstructionshowsolidisitsbase
_version_ 1724949052141862912