Mesopic visual quality after three kinds of aspheric acrylic monofocal intraocular lenses

AIM:To evaluate best corrected visual acuity(BCVA)and contrast sensitivity(CS)under mesopic condition with no glare in patients following implantation of three different kinds of aspheric acrylic monofocal intraocular lens(IOLs).<p>METHODS: Seventy-seven cases(90 eyes)of age-related cataract p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hai-Lun Ji, Wei Xiao, Wei Pu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Press of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS) 2013-08-01
Series:Guoji Yanke Zazhi
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ies.net.cn/cn_publish/2013/8/201308028.pdf
id doaj-3dc555933bcd4b69948ae952e0107ac3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3dc555933bcd4b69948ae952e0107ac32020-11-24T20:40:33ZengPress of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS)Guoji Yanke Zazhi1672-51232013-08-011381609161210.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2013.08.28Mesopic visual quality after three kinds of aspheric acrylic monofocal intraocular lensesHai-Lun JiWei XiaoWei PuAIM:To evaluate best corrected visual acuity(BCVA)and contrast sensitivity(CS)under mesopic condition with no glare in patients following implantation of three different kinds of aspheric acrylic monofocal intraocular lens(IOLs).<p>METHODS: Seventy-seven cases(90 eyes)of age-related cataract patients were selected, who were undergone phacoemulsification and intraocular lens(IOL)implantation in our hospital during December 2011 to November 2012. Preoperatively, the patients were randomly divided into three groups: 30 eyes(25 cases)were implanted with hydrophobic yellow-tinted acrylic(HOYA)IOLs in group 1; 30 eyes(28 cases)with hydrophilic acrylic IOLs(Rayner)in group 2; 30 eyes(24 cases)with hydrophilic acrylic surface heparin processing IOLs(XO)in group 3. All eyes were evaluated at 1 month and 3 months postoperatively. The BCVA and CS under mesopic condition without glare were measured and underwent statistical analysis.<p>RESULTS: There was neither statistically significant difference in the BCVA(<i>P</i>>0.05), nor statistically significant difference in CS results(after standardization of contrast sensitivity value: lgCS)(<i>P</i>>0.05)between groups under mesopic condition, but the lgCS of the HOYA group decreased slightly. <p>CONCLUSION: There were not marked differences of BCVA and CS between groups of patients at the follow-up intervals of 1 month and 3 months under mesopic condition. The blue-filter type artificial lens may protect the retina, thus, it is advisable to implant yellow-tinted filter blue artificial lens, especially for patients who are children or young persons.http://www.ies.net.cn/cn_publish/2013/8/201308028.pdfcontrast sensitivityaspheric intraocular lensphacoemulsificationblue-filter IOLs
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hai-Lun Ji
Wei Xiao
Wei Pu
spellingShingle Hai-Lun Ji
Wei Xiao
Wei Pu
Mesopic visual quality after three kinds of aspheric acrylic monofocal intraocular lenses
Guoji Yanke Zazhi
contrast sensitivity
aspheric intraocular lens
phacoemulsification
blue-filter IOLs
author_facet Hai-Lun Ji
Wei Xiao
Wei Pu
author_sort Hai-Lun Ji
title Mesopic visual quality after three kinds of aspheric acrylic monofocal intraocular lenses
title_short Mesopic visual quality after three kinds of aspheric acrylic monofocal intraocular lenses
title_full Mesopic visual quality after three kinds of aspheric acrylic monofocal intraocular lenses
title_fullStr Mesopic visual quality after three kinds of aspheric acrylic monofocal intraocular lenses
title_full_unstemmed Mesopic visual quality after three kinds of aspheric acrylic monofocal intraocular lenses
title_sort mesopic visual quality after three kinds of aspheric acrylic monofocal intraocular lenses
publisher Press of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS)
series Guoji Yanke Zazhi
issn 1672-5123
publishDate 2013-08-01
description AIM:To evaluate best corrected visual acuity(BCVA)and contrast sensitivity(CS)under mesopic condition with no glare in patients following implantation of three different kinds of aspheric acrylic monofocal intraocular lens(IOLs).<p>METHODS: Seventy-seven cases(90 eyes)of age-related cataract patients were selected, who were undergone phacoemulsification and intraocular lens(IOL)implantation in our hospital during December 2011 to November 2012. Preoperatively, the patients were randomly divided into three groups: 30 eyes(25 cases)were implanted with hydrophobic yellow-tinted acrylic(HOYA)IOLs in group 1; 30 eyes(28 cases)with hydrophilic acrylic IOLs(Rayner)in group 2; 30 eyes(24 cases)with hydrophilic acrylic surface heparin processing IOLs(XO)in group 3. All eyes were evaluated at 1 month and 3 months postoperatively. The BCVA and CS under mesopic condition without glare were measured and underwent statistical analysis.<p>RESULTS: There was neither statistically significant difference in the BCVA(<i>P</i>>0.05), nor statistically significant difference in CS results(after standardization of contrast sensitivity value: lgCS)(<i>P</i>>0.05)between groups under mesopic condition, but the lgCS of the HOYA group decreased slightly. <p>CONCLUSION: There were not marked differences of BCVA and CS between groups of patients at the follow-up intervals of 1 month and 3 months under mesopic condition. The blue-filter type artificial lens may protect the retina, thus, it is advisable to implant yellow-tinted filter blue artificial lens, especially for patients who are children or young persons.
topic contrast sensitivity
aspheric intraocular lens
phacoemulsification
blue-filter IOLs
url http://www.ies.net.cn/cn_publish/2013/8/201308028.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT hailunji mesopicvisualqualityafterthreekindsofasphericacrylicmonofocalintraocularlenses
AT weixiao mesopicvisualqualityafterthreekindsofasphericacrylicmonofocalintraocularlenses
AT weipu mesopicvisualqualityafterthreekindsofasphericacrylicmonofocalintraocularlenses
_version_ 1716826575964471296