Is C2-3 fusion an evidence of atlantoaxial instability? An analysis based on surgical treatment of seven patients
Objective: The authors analyze the rationale of atlantoaxial fixation in patients presenting with symptoms related to cervical myelopathy and wherein the radiological images depicted C2–3 fusion and presence of single or multiple level neural compression of the subaxial cervical spinal cord attribut...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2020-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.jcvjs.com/article.asp?issn=0974-8237;year=2020;volume=11;issue=1;spage=46;epage=50;aulast= |
id |
doaj-3da9894fcf424793976d8102ab08f485 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-3da9894fcf424793976d8102ab08f4852020-11-25T02:05:59ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine0974-82372020-01-01111465010.4103/jcvjs.JCVJS_25_20Is C2-3 fusion an evidence of atlantoaxial instability? An analysis based on surgical treatment of seven patientsAtul GoelDikpal JadhavAbhidha ShahSurvendra RaiSaswat DandpatNeha JadhavTejas VajaObjective: The authors analyze the rationale of atlantoaxial fixation in patients presenting with symptoms related to cervical myelopathy and wherein the radiological images depicted C2–3 fusion and presence of single or multiple level neural compression of the subaxial cervical spinal cord attributed to “degenerative” spine. Materials and Methods: Seven adult males were analyzed who presented with long-standing symptoms of progressive cervical myelopathy and where imaging showed presence of C2–3 fusion, no cord compression related to odontoid process, and evidence of single or multiple level lower cervical cord compression conventionally attributed to spinal degeneration. There was no other bone or soft tissue abnormality at the craniovertebral junction. There was no evidence of atlantoaxial instability when assessed by conventional radiological diagnostic parameters. Atlantoaxial instability was diagnosed on the basis of clinical understanding, atlantoaxial facetal malalignment, and manual assessment of instability by bone handling during surgery. All the seven patients underwent atlantoaxial fixation and no surgical manipulation at lower cervical spinal levels. Results: At an average follow-up of 34 months, all patients have recovered satisfactorily in their neurological function. Conclusion: The presence of C2–3 fusion is an indication of atlantoaxial instability and suggests the need for atlantoaxial stabilization. Effects on the subaxial spine and spinal cord are secondary events and may not be surgically addressed.http://www.jcvjs.com/article.asp?issn=0974-8237;year=2020;volume=11;issue=1;spage=46;epage=50;aulast=atlantoaxial instabilityc2–3 fusionspinal degeneration |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Atul Goel Dikpal Jadhav Abhidha Shah Survendra Rai Saswat Dandpat Neha Jadhav Tejas Vaja |
spellingShingle |
Atul Goel Dikpal Jadhav Abhidha Shah Survendra Rai Saswat Dandpat Neha Jadhav Tejas Vaja Is C2-3 fusion an evidence of atlantoaxial instability? An analysis based on surgical treatment of seven patients Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine atlantoaxial instability c2–3 fusion spinal degeneration |
author_facet |
Atul Goel Dikpal Jadhav Abhidha Shah Survendra Rai Saswat Dandpat Neha Jadhav Tejas Vaja |
author_sort |
Atul Goel |
title |
Is C2-3 fusion an evidence of atlantoaxial instability? An analysis based on surgical treatment of seven patients |
title_short |
Is C2-3 fusion an evidence of atlantoaxial instability? An analysis based on surgical treatment of seven patients |
title_full |
Is C2-3 fusion an evidence of atlantoaxial instability? An analysis based on surgical treatment of seven patients |
title_fullStr |
Is C2-3 fusion an evidence of atlantoaxial instability? An analysis based on surgical treatment of seven patients |
title_full_unstemmed |
Is C2-3 fusion an evidence of atlantoaxial instability? An analysis based on surgical treatment of seven patients |
title_sort |
is c2-3 fusion an evidence of atlantoaxial instability? an analysis based on surgical treatment of seven patients |
publisher |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
series |
Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine |
issn |
0974-8237 |
publishDate |
2020-01-01 |
description |
Objective: The authors analyze the rationale of atlantoaxial fixation in patients presenting with symptoms related to cervical myelopathy and wherein the radiological images depicted C2–3 fusion and presence of single or multiple level neural compression of the subaxial cervical spinal cord attributed to “degenerative” spine.
Materials and Methods: Seven adult males were analyzed who presented with long-standing symptoms of progressive cervical myelopathy and where imaging showed presence of C2–3 fusion, no cord compression related to odontoid process, and evidence of single or multiple level lower cervical cord compression conventionally attributed to spinal degeneration. There was no other bone or soft tissue abnormality at the craniovertebral junction. There was no evidence of atlantoaxial instability when assessed by conventional radiological diagnostic parameters. Atlantoaxial instability was diagnosed on the basis of clinical understanding, atlantoaxial facetal malalignment, and manual assessment of instability by bone handling during surgery. All the seven patients underwent atlantoaxial fixation and no surgical manipulation at lower cervical spinal levels.
Results: At an average follow-up of 34 months, all patients have recovered satisfactorily in their neurological function.
Conclusion: The presence of C2–3 fusion is an indication of atlantoaxial instability and suggests the need for atlantoaxial stabilization. Effects on the subaxial spine and spinal cord are secondary events and may not be surgically addressed. |
topic |
atlantoaxial instability c2–3 fusion spinal degeneration |
url |
http://www.jcvjs.com/article.asp?issn=0974-8237;year=2020;volume=11;issue=1;spage=46;epage=50;aulast= |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT atulgoel isc23fusionanevidenceofatlantoaxialinstabilityananalysisbasedonsurgicaltreatmentofsevenpatients AT dikpaljadhav isc23fusionanevidenceofatlantoaxialinstabilityananalysisbasedonsurgicaltreatmentofsevenpatients AT abhidhashah isc23fusionanevidenceofatlantoaxialinstabilityananalysisbasedonsurgicaltreatmentofsevenpatients AT survendrarai isc23fusionanevidenceofatlantoaxialinstabilityananalysisbasedonsurgicaltreatmentofsevenpatients AT saswatdandpat isc23fusionanevidenceofatlantoaxialinstabilityananalysisbasedonsurgicaltreatmentofsevenpatients AT nehajadhav isc23fusionanevidenceofatlantoaxialinstabilityananalysisbasedonsurgicaltreatmentofsevenpatients AT tejasvaja isc23fusionanevidenceofatlantoaxialinstabilityananalysisbasedonsurgicaltreatmentofsevenpatients |
_version_ |
1724935770626588672 |