Is C2-3 fusion an evidence of atlantoaxial instability? An analysis based on surgical treatment of seven patients

Objective: The authors analyze the rationale of atlantoaxial fixation in patients presenting with symptoms related to cervical myelopathy and wherein the radiological images depicted C2–3 fusion and presence of single or multiple level neural compression of the subaxial cervical spinal cord attribut...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Atul Goel, Dikpal Jadhav, Abhidha Shah, Survendra Rai, Saswat Dandpat, Neha Jadhav, Tejas Vaja
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2020-01-01
Series:Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jcvjs.com/article.asp?issn=0974-8237;year=2020;volume=11;issue=1;spage=46;epage=50;aulast=
id doaj-3da9894fcf424793976d8102ab08f485
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3da9894fcf424793976d8102ab08f4852020-11-25T02:05:59ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine0974-82372020-01-01111465010.4103/jcvjs.JCVJS_25_20Is C2-3 fusion an evidence of atlantoaxial instability? An analysis based on surgical treatment of seven patientsAtul GoelDikpal JadhavAbhidha ShahSurvendra RaiSaswat DandpatNeha JadhavTejas VajaObjective: The authors analyze the rationale of atlantoaxial fixation in patients presenting with symptoms related to cervical myelopathy and wherein the radiological images depicted C2–3 fusion and presence of single or multiple level neural compression of the subaxial cervical spinal cord attributed to “degenerative” spine. Materials and Methods: Seven adult males were analyzed who presented with long-standing symptoms of progressive cervical myelopathy and where imaging showed presence of C2–3 fusion, no cord compression related to odontoid process, and evidence of single or multiple level lower cervical cord compression conventionally attributed to spinal degeneration. There was no other bone or soft tissue abnormality at the craniovertebral junction. There was no evidence of atlantoaxial instability when assessed by conventional radiological diagnostic parameters. Atlantoaxial instability was diagnosed on the basis of clinical understanding, atlantoaxial facetal malalignment, and manual assessment of instability by bone handling during surgery. All the seven patients underwent atlantoaxial fixation and no surgical manipulation at lower cervical spinal levels. Results: At an average follow-up of 34 months, all patients have recovered satisfactorily in their neurological function. Conclusion: The presence of C2–3 fusion is an indication of atlantoaxial instability and suggests the need for atlantoaxial stabilization. Effects on the subaxial spine and spinal cord are secondary events and may not be surgically addressed.http://www.jcvjs.com/article.asp?issn=0974-8237;year=2020;volume=11;issue=1;spage=46;epage=50;aulast=atlantoaxial instabilityc2–3 fusionspinal degeneration
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Atul Goel
Dikpal Jadhav
Abhidha Shah
Survendra Rai
Saswat Dandpat
Neha Jadhav
Tejas Vaja
spellingShingle Atul Goel
Dikpal Jadhav
Abhidha Shah
Survendra Rai
Saswat Dandpat
Neha Jadhav
Tejas Vaja
Is C2-3 fusion an evidence of atlantoaxial instability? An analysis based on surgical treatment of seven patients
Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine
atlantoaxial instability
c2–3 fusion
spinal degeneration
author_facet Atul Goel
Dikpal Jadhav
Abhidha Shah
Survendra Rai
Saswat Dandpat
Neha Jadhav
Tejas Vaja
author_sort Atul Goel
title Is C2-3 fusion an evidence of atlantoaxial instability? An analysis based on surgical treatment of seven patients
title_short Is C2-3 fusion an evidence of atlantoaxial instability? An analysis based on surgical treatment of seven patients
title_full Is C2-3 fusion an evidence of atlantoaxial instability? An analysis based on surgical treatment of seven patients
title_fullStr Is C2-3 fusion an evidence of atlantoaxial instability? An analysis based on surgical treatment of seven patients
title_full_unstemmed Is C2-3 fusion an evidence of atlantoaxial instability? An analysis based on surgical treatment of seven patients
title_sort is c2-3 fusion an evidence of atlantoaxial instability? an analysis based on surgical treatment of seven patients
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine
issn 0974-8237
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Objective: The authors analyze the rationale of atlantoaxial fixation in patients presenting with symptoms related to cervical myelopathy and wherein the radiological images depicted C2–3 fusion and presence of single or multiple level neural compression of the subaxial cervical spinal cord attributed to “degenerative” spine. Materials and Methods: Seven adult males were analyzed who presented with long-standing symptoms of progressive cervical myelopathy and where imaging showed presence of C2–3 fusion, no cord compression related to odontoid process, and evidence of single or multiple level lower cervical cord compression conventionally attributed to spinal degeneration. There was no other bone or soft tissue abnormality at the craniovertebral junction. There was no evidence of atlantoaxial instability when assessed by conventional radiological diagnostic parameters. Atlantoaxial instability was diagnosed on the basis of clinical understanding, atlantoaxial facetal malalignment, and manual assessment of instability by bone handling during surgery. All the seven patients underwent atlantoaxial fixation and no surgical manipulation at lower cervical spinal levels. Results: At an average follow-up of 34 months, all patients have recovered satisfactorily in their neurological function. Conclusion: The presence of C2–3 fusion is an indication of atlantoaxial instability and suggests the need for atlantoaxial stabilization. Effects on the subaxial spine and spinal cord are secondary events and may not be surgically addressed.
topic atlantoaxial instability
c2–3 fusion
spinal degeneration
url http://www.jcvjs.com/article.asp?issn=0974-8237;year=2020;volume=11;issue=1;spage=46;epage=50;aulast=
work_keys_str_mv AT atulgoel isc23fusionanevidenceofatlantoaxialinstabilityananalysisbasedonsurgicaltreatmentofsevenpatients
AT dikpaljadhav isc23fusionanevidenceofatlantoaxialinstabilityananalysisbasedonsurgicaltreatmentofsevenpatients
AT abhidhashah isc23fusionanevidenceofatlantoaxialinstabilityananalysisbasedonsurgicaltreatmentofsevenpatients
AT survendrarai isc23fusionanevidenceofatlantoaxialinstabilityananalysisbasedonsurgicaltreatmentofsevenpatients
AT saswatdandpat isc23fusionanevidenceofatlantoaxialinstabilityananalysisbasedonsurgicaltreatmentofsevenpatients
AT nehajadhav isc23fusionanevidenceofatlantoaxialinstabilityananalysisbasedonsurgicaltreatmentofsevenpatients
AT tejasvaja isc23fusionanevidenceofatlantoaxialinstabilityananalysisbasedonsurgicaltreatmentofsevenpatients
_version_ 1724935770626588672